Cargando…
Safety and feasibility of lung biopsy in diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a type of acute respiratory failure characterised by non-cardiac pulmonary oedema caused by various underlying conditions. ARDS is often pathologically characterised by diffuse alveolar damage, and its pathological findings have been report...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7883844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33579770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043600 |
_version_ | 1783651295337381888 |
---|---|
author | Fukuda, Yosuke Sugimoto, Hiroshi Yamada, Yoshie Ito, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Takeshi Yoshida, Takuo Okamori, Satoshi Ando, Koichi Okada, Yohei |
author_facet | Fukuda, Yosuke Sugimoto, Hiroshi Yamada, Yoshie Ito, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Takeshi Yoshida, Takuo Okamori, Satoshi Ando, Koichi Okada, Yohei |
author_sort | Fukuda, Yosuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a type of acute respiratory failure characterised by non-cardiac pulmonary oedema caused by various underlying conditions. ARDS is often pathologically characterised by diffuse alveolar damage, and its pathological findings have been reported to be associated with prognosis, although the adverse effects of lung biopsies to obtain pathological findings are still unclear. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to reveal the safety and feasibility of lung biopsy in the diagnosis of ARDS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will include studies that were published in MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials until 1 June 2020. We will include the reports for critically ill patients in an intensive care unit or emergency department who undergo lung biopsy and require a mechanical ventilation. Two review authors will independently scan titles and abstracts of all identified studies. Furthermore, these two authors will read and assess the full text of study reports to identify trials that appeared broadly to address the subject of the review. We will perform a risk of bias assessment using the McMaster Quality Assessment Scale of Harms. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will be based on the published data, therefore, it does not require ethical approval. The final results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000040650. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7883844 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78838442021-02-25 Safety and feasibility of lung biopsy in diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis Fukuda, Yosuke Sugimoto, Hiroshi Yamada, Yoshie Ito, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Takeshi Yoshida, Takuo Okamori, Satoshi Ando, Koichi Okada, Yohei BMJ Open Intensive Care INTRODUCTION: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a type of acute respiratory failure characterised by non-cardiac pulmonary oedema caused by various underlying conditions. ARDS is often pathologically characterised by diffuse alveolar damage, and its pathological findings have been reported to be associated with prognosis, although the adverse effects of lung biopsies to obtain pathological findings are still unclear. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to reveal the safety and feasibility of lung biopsy in the diagnosis of ARDS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will include studies that were published in MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials until 1 June 2020. We will include the reports for critically ill patients in an intensive care unit or emergency department who undergo lung biopsy and require a mechanical ventilation. Two review authors will independently scan titles and abstracts of all identified studies. Furthermore, these two authors will read and assess the full text of study reports to identify trials that appeared broadly to address the subject of the review. We will perform a risk of bias assessment using the McMaster Quality Assessment Scale of Harms. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will be based on the published data, therefore, it does not require ethical approval. The final results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000040650. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7883844/ /pubmed/33579770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043600 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Intensive Care Fukuda, Yosuke Sugimoto, Hiroshi Yamada, Yoshie Ito, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Takeshi Yoshida, Takuo Okamori, Satoshi Ando, Koichi Okada, Yohei Safety and feasibility of lung biopsy in diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Safety and feasibility of lung biopsy in diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Safety and feasibility of lung biopsy in diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Safety and feasibility of lung biopsy in diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and feasibility of lung biopsy in diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Safety and feasibility of lung biopsy in diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | safety and feasibility of lung biopsy in diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Intensive Care |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7883844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33579770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043600 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fukudayosuke safetyandfeasibilityoflungbiopsyindiagnosisofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sugimotohiroshi safetyandfeasibilityoflungbiopsyindiagnosisofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yamadayoshie safetyandfeasibilityoflungbiopsyindiagnosisofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT itohiroyuki safetyandfeasibilityoflungbiopsyindiagnosisofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tanakatakeshi safetyandfeasibilityoflungbiopsyindiagnosisofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yoshidatakuo safetyandfeasibilityoflungbiopsyindiagnosisofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT okamorisatoshi safetyandfeasibilityoflungbiopsyindiagnosisofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT andokoichi safetyandfeasibilityoflungbiopsyindiagnosisofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT okadayohei safetyandfeasibilityoflungbiopsyindiagnosisofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |