Cargando…

Effect of consumption of animal milk compared to infant formula for non-breastfed/mixed-fed infants 6–11 months of age: a systematic review (protocol)

INTRODUCTION: Prevalence rates of breastfeeding remain low even though the World Health Organization (WHO) and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend exclusive breast feeding for the first 6 months of life in combination with appropriate complementary feeding beyond six 6 months of age. There...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Imdad, Aamer, Ehrlich, Julie Melissa, Catania, Joseph, Tanner-Smith, Emily, Smith, Abigail, Tsistinas, Olivia, Bhutta, Zulfiqar Ahmed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7883848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33579775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046370
_version_ 1783651296044122112
author Imdad, Aamer
Ehrlich, Julie Melissa
Catania, Joseph
Tanner-Smith, Emily
Smith, Abigail
Tsistinas, Olivia
Bhutta, Zulfiqar Ahmed
author_facet Imdad, Aamer
Ehrlich, Julie Melissa
Catania, Joseph
Tanner-Smith, Emily
Smith, Abigail
Tsistinas, Olivia
Bhutta, Zulfiqar Ahmed
author_sort Imdad, Aamer
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Prevalence rates of breastfeeding remain low even though the World Health Organization (WHO) and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend exclusive breast feeding for the first 6 months of life in combination with appropriate complementary feeding beyond six 6 months of age. There have been several studies that address the implication of drinking animal milk and/or infant formula on children’s health and development when breast feeding is not offered during the first year of life. Vast improvements have been made in infant formula design, which may increase its benefits compared with animal’s milk. The objective of this review is therefore to synthesise the most recent evidence on the effects of the consumption of animal milk compared with infant formula in non-breastfed or mixed breastfed infants aged 6–11 months. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that assessed the effect of animal milk compared with formula or mixed-fed (breastmilk and formula) on infants aged 6–11 months. The primary outcomes of interest include anaemia, gastrointestinal blood loss, weight for age, height for age and weight for height. We will include randomised and non-randomised studies with a control group. We will use the Cochrane risk of bias tools to assess the risk of bias. We will use meta-analysis to pool findings if the identified studies are conceptually homogenous and data are available from more than one study. We will assess the overall quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This is a systematic review, so no patients will be directly involved in the design or development of this study. The findings from this systematic review will be disseminated to relevant patient populations and caregivers and will guide the WHO’s recommendations on formula consumption versus animal milk in infants aged 6–11 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020210925.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7883848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78838482021-02-25 Effect of consumption of animal milk compared to infant formula for non-breastfed/mixed-fed infants 6–11 months of age: a systematic review (protocol) Imdad, Aamer Ehrlich, Julie Melissa Catania, Joseph Tanner-Smith, Emily Smith, Abigail Tsistinas, Olivia Bhutta, Zulfiqar Ahmed BMJ Open Paediatrics INTRODUCTION: Prevalence rates of breastfeeding remain low even though the World Health Organization (WHO) and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend exclusive breast feeding for the first 6 months of life in combination with appropriate complementary feeding beyond six 6 months of age. There have been several studies that address the implication of drinking animal milk and/or infant formula on children’s health and development when breast feeding is not offered during the first year of life. Vast improvements have been made in infant formula design, which may increase its benefits compared with animal’s milk. The objective of this review is therefore to synthesise the most recent evidence on the effects of the consumption of animal milk compared with infant formula in non-breastfed or mixed breastfed infants aged 6–11 months. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that assessed the effect of animal milk compared with formula or mixed-fed (breastmilk and formula) on infants aged 6–11 months. The primary outcomes of interest include anaemia, gastrointestinal blood loss, weight for age, height for age and weight for height. We will include randomised and non-randomised studies with a control group. We will use the Cochrane risk of bias tools to assess the risk of bias. We will use meta-analysis to pool findings if the identified studies are conceptually homogenous and data are available from more than one study. We will assess the overall quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This is a systematic review, so no patients will be directly involved in the design or development of this study. The findings from this systematic review will be disseminated to relevant patient populations and caregivers and will guide the WHO’s recommendations on formula consumption versus animal milk in infants aged 6–11 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020210925. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7883848/ /pubmed/33579775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046370 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Paediatrics
Imdad, Aamer
Ehrlich, Julie Melissa
Catania, Joseph
Tanner-Smith, Emily
Smith, Abigail
Tsistinas, Olivia
Bhutta, Zulfiqar Ahmed
Effect of consumption of animal milk compared to infant formula for non-breastfed/mixed-fed infants 6–11 months of age: a systematic review (protocol)
title Effect of consumption of animal milk compared to infant formula for non-breastfed/mixed-fed infants 6–11 months of age: a systematic review (protocol)
title_full Effect of consumption of animal milk compared to infant formula for non-breastfed/mixed-fed infants 6–11 months of age: a systematic review (protocol)
title_fullStr Effect of consumption of animal milk compared to infant formula for non-breastfed/mixed-fed infants 6–11 months of age: a systematic review (protocol)
title_full_unstemmed Effect of consumption of animal milk compared to infant formula for non-breastfed/mixed-fed infants 6–11 months of age: a systematic review (protocol)
title_short Effect of consumption of animal milk compared to infant formula for non-breastfed/mixed-fed infants 6–11 months of age: a systematic review (protocol)
title_sort effect of consumption of animal milk compared to infant formula for non-breastfed/mixed-fed infants 6–11 months of age: a systematic review (protocol)
topic Paediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7883848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33579775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046370
work_keys_str_mv AT imdadaamer effectofconsumptionofanimalmilkcomparedtoinfantformulafornonbreastfedmixedfedinfants611monthsofageasystematicreviewprotocol
AT ehrlichjuliemelissa effectofconsumptionofanimalmilkcomparedtoinfantformulafornonbreastfedmixedfedinfants611monthsofageasystematicreviewprotocol
AT cataniajoseph effectofconsumptionofanimalmilkcomparedtoinfantformulafornonbreastfedmixedfedinfants611monthsofageasystematicreviewprotocol
AT tannersmithemily effectofconsumptionofanimalmilkcomparedtoinfantformulafornonbreastfedmixedfedinfants611monthsofageasystematicreviewprotocol
AT smithabigail effectofconsumptionofanimalmilkcomparedtoinfantformulafornonbreastfedmixedfedinfants611monthsofageasystematicreviewprotocol
AT tsistinasolivia effectofconsumptionofanimalmilkcomparedtoinfantformulafornonbreastfedmixedfedinfants611monthsofageasystematicreviewprotocol
AT bhuttazulfiqarahmed effectofconsumptionofanimalmilkcomparedtoinfantformulafornonbreastfedmixedfedinfants611monthsofageasystematicreviewprotocol