Cargando…
Development and evaluation of a decision aid for family surrogate decision-makers for patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in ICUs: a study protocol
INTRODUCTION: Shared decision making is endorsed by guidelines for both acute kidney injury and critical care medicine. However, there is still a huge need for effective interventions, especially those focusing on decisions about renal replacement therapy for intensive care unit (ICU) patients with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7883861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33579767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043385 |
_version_ | 1783651298649833472 |
---|---|
author | Zheng, Miao Yin, Changlin Cao, Ying Zhang, Yonghui Zhang, Kuoliang Zhang, Xiaoqin Bian, Wei Wang, Lihua |
author_facet | Zheng, Miao Yin, Changlin Cao, Ying Zhang, Yonghui Zhang, Kuoliang Zhang, Xiaoqin Bian, Wei Wang, Lihua |
author_sort | Zheng, Miao |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Shared decision making is endorsed by guidelines for both acute kidney injury and critical care medicine. However, there is still a huge need for effective interventions, especially those focusing on decisions about renal replacement therapy for intensive care unit (ICU) patients with acute kidney injury. The decision aids provide evidence-based support for shared decision making, to achieve better decisions through enhanced knowledge of treatment options and treatment aligns with patients’ preferences and values. Therefore, our objectives are to develop and evaluate a decision aid systematically and rigorously for family surrogate decision makers of ICU patients with acute kidney injury who need renal replacement therapy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will use a systematic development process that focuses on user-centred design to develop and evaluate the decision aid in three phases: (1) development of a draft prototype for the decision aid based on extensive literature reviews, interviews with key stakeholders and evidence synthesis; (2) alpha testing (‘near live’ usability) the decision aid during simulated clinical encounters to test its comprehensibility, acceptability and usability and (3) beta testing (‘live’ usability) to examine the aid’s clinical feasibility. User testing will be conducted using mixed-methods approach to support iterative revision of the decision aid. The IPDASi (V.4.0) will be used for following qualitative assessment. All interviews will be analysed by Colaizzi’s seven-step approach to qualitative analysis. The coding scheme will use to analyse user interactions. Questionnaire surveys will be analysed using paired sample t-tests when related to the before-and-after survey, otherwise using one-sample t-test. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this research was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, PLA (Ref: KY2020104). All participants will sign a formal informed consent form. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and reported in appropriate meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2000031613. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7883861 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78838612021-02-25 Development and evaluation of a decision aid for family surrogate decision-makers for patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in ICUs: a study protocol Zheng, Miao Yin, Changlin Cao, Ying Zhang, Yonghui Zhang, Kuoliang Zhang, Xiaoqin Bian, Wei Wang, Lihua BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine INTRODUCTION: Shared decision making is endorsed by guidelines for both acute kidney injury and critical care medicine. However, there is still a huge need for effective interventions, especially those focusing on decisions about renal replacement therapy for intensive care unit (ICU) patients with acute kidney injury. The decision aids provide evidence-based support for shared decision making, to achieve better decisions through enhanced knowledge of treatment options and treatment aligns with patients’ preferences and values. Therefore, our objectives are to develop and evaluate a decision aid systematically and rigorously for family surrogate decision makers of ICU patients with acute kidney injury who need renal replacement therapy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will use a systematic development process that focuses on user-centred design to develop and evaluate the decision aid in three phases: (1) development of a draft prototype for the decision aid based on extensive literature reviews, interviews with key stakeholders and evidence synthesis; (2) alpha testing (‘near live’ usability) the decision aid during simulated clinical encounters to test its comprehensibility, acceptability and usability and (3) beta testing (‘live’ usability) to examine the aid’s clinical feasibility. User testing will be conducted using mixed-methods approach to support iterative revision of the decision aid. The IPDASi (V.4.0) will be used for following qualitative assessment. All interviews will be analysed by Colaizzi’s seven-step approach to qualitative analysis. The coding scheme will use to analyse user interactions. Questionnaire surveys will be analysed using paired sample t-tests when related to the before-and-after survey, otherwise using one-sample t-test. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this research was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, PLA (Ref: KY2020104). All participants will sign a formal informed consent form. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and reported in appropriate meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2000031613. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7883861/ /pubmed/33579767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043385 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Patient-Centred Medicine Zheng, Miao Yin, Changlin Cao, Ying Zhang, Yonghui Zhang, Kuoliang Zhang, Xiaoqin Bian, Wei Wang, Lihua Development and evaluation of a decision aid for family surrogate decision-makers for patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in ICUs: a study protocol |
title | Development and evaluation of a decision aid for family surrogate decision-makers for patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in ICUs: a study protocol |
title_full | Development and evaluation of a decision aid for family surrogate decision-makers for patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in ICUs: a study protocol |
title_fullStr | Development and evaluation of a decision aid for family surrogate decision-makers for patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in ICUs: a study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and evaluation of a decision aid for family surrogate decision-makers for patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in ICUs: a study protocol |
title_short | Development and evaluation of a decision aid for family surrogate decision-makers for patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in ICUs: a study protocol |
title_sort | development and evaluation of a decision aid for family surrogate decision-makers for patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (rrt) in icus: a study protocol |
topic | Patient-Centred Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7883861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33579767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043385 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhengmiao developmentandevaluationofadecisionaidforfamilysurrogatedecisionmakersforpatientswithacutekidneyinjuryrequiringrenalreplacementtherapyrrtinicusastudyprotocol AT yinchanglin developmentandevaluationofadecisionaidforfamilysurrogatedecisionmakersforpatientswithacutekidneyinjuryrequiringrenalreplacementtherapyrrtinicusastudyprotocol AT caoying developmentandevaluationofadecisionaidforfamilysurrogatedecisionmakersforpatientswithacutekidneyinjuryrequiringrenalreplacementtherapyrrtinicusastudyprotocol AT zhangyonghui developmentandevaluationofadecisionaidforfamilysurrogatedecisionmakersforpatientswithacutekidneyinjuryrequiringrenalreplacementtherapyrrtinicusastudyprotocol AT zhangkuoliang developmentandevaluationofadecisionaidforfamilysurrogatedecisionmakersforpatientswithacutekidneyinjuryrequiringrenalreplacementtherapyrrtinicusastudyprotocol AT zhangxiaoqin developmentandevaluationofadecisionaidforfamilysurrogatedecisionmakersforpatientswithacutekidneyinjuryrequiringrenalreplacementtherapyrrtinicusastudyprotocol AT bianwei developmentandevaluationofadecisionaidforfamilysurrogatedecisionmakersforpatientswithacutekidneyinjuryrequiringrenalreplacementtherapyrrtinicusastudyprotocol AT wanglihua developmentandevaluationofadecisionaidforfamilysurrogatedecisionmakersforpatientswithacutekidneyinjuryrequiringrenalreplacementtherapyrrtinicusastudyprotocol |