Cargando…

Development and evaluation of a decision aid for family surrogate decision-makers for patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in ICUs: a study protocol

INTRODUCTION: Shared decision making is endorsed by guidelines for both acute kidney injury and critical care medicine. However, there is still a huge need for effective interventions, especially those focusing on decisions about renal replacement therapy for intensive care unit (ICU) patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Miao, Yin, Changlin, Cao, Ying, Zhang, Yonghui, Zhang, Kuoliang, Zhang, Xiaoqin, Bian, Wei, Wang, Lihua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7883861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33579767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043385
_version_ 1783651298649833472
author Zheng, Miao
Yin, Changlin
Cao, Ying
Zhang, Yonghui
Zhang, Kuoliang
Zhang, Xiaoqin
Bian, Wei
Wang, Lihua
author_facet Zheng, Miao
Yin, Changlin
Cao, Ying
Zhang, Yonghui
Zhang, Kuoliang
Zhang, Xiaoqin
Bian, Wei
Wang, Lihua
author_sort Zheng, Miao
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Shared decision making is endorsed by guidelines for both acute kidney injury and critical care medicine. However, there is still a huge need for effective interventions, especially those focusing on decisions about renal replacement therapy for intensive care unit (ICU) patients with acute kidney injury. The decision aids provide evidence-based support for shared decision making, to achieve better decisions through enhanced knowledge of treatment options and treatment aligns with patients’ preferences and values. Therefore, our objectives are to develop and evaluate a decision aid systematically and rigorously for family surrogate decision makers of ICU patients with acute kidney injury who need renal replacement therapy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will use a systematic development process that focuses on user-centred design to develop and evaluate the decision aid in three phases: (1) development of a draft prototype for the decision aid based on extensive literature reviews, interviews with key stakeholders and evidence synthesis; (2) alpha testing (‘near live’ usability) the decision aid during simulated clinical encounters to test its comprehensibility, acceptability and usability and (3) beta testing (‘live’ usability) to examine the aid’s clinical feasibility. User testing will be conducted using mixed-methods approach to support iterative revision of the decision aid. The IPDASi (V.4.0) will be used for following qualitative assessment. All interviews will be analysed by Colaizzi’s seven-step approach to qualitative analysis. The coding scheme will use to analyse user interactions. Questionnaire surveys will be analysed using paired sample t-tests when related to the before-and-after survey, otherwise using one-sample t-test. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this research was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, PLA (Ref: KY2020104). All participants will sign a formal informed consent form. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and reported in appropriate meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2000031613.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7883861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78838612021-02-25 Development and evaluation of a decision aid for family surrogate decision-makers for patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in ICUs: a study protocol Zheng, Miao Yin, Changlin Cao, Ying Zhang, Yonghui Zhang, Kuoliang Zhang, Xiaoqin Bian, Wei Wang, Lihua BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine INTRODUCTION: Shared decision making is endorsed by guidelines for both acute kidney injury and critical care medicine. However, there is still a huge need for effective interventions, especially those focusing on decisions about renal replacement therapy for intensive care unit (ICU) patients with acute kidney injury. The decision aids provide evidence-based support for shared decision making, to achieve better decisions through enhanced knowledge of treatment options and treatment aligns with patients’ preferences and values. Therefore, our objectives are to develop and evaluate a decision aid systematically and rigorously for family surrogate decision makers of ICU patients with acute kidney injury who need renal replacement therapy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will use a systematic development process that focuses on user-centred design to develop and evaluate the decision aid in three phases: (1) development of a draft prototype for the decision aid based on extensive literature reviews, interviews with key stakeholders and evidence synthesis; (2) alpha testing (‘near live’ usability) the decision aid during simulated clinical encounters to test its comprehensibility, acceptability and usability and (3) beta testing (‘live’ usability) to examine the aid’s clinical feasibility. User testing will be conducted using mixed-methods approach to support iterative revision of the decision aid. The IPDASi (V.4.0) will be used for following qualitative assessment. All interviews will be analysed by Colaizzi’s seven-step approach to qualitative analysis. The coding scheme will use to analyse user interactions. Questionnaire surveys will be analysed using paired sample t-tests when related to the before-and-after survey, otherwise using one-sample t-test. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this research was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, PLA (Ref: KY2020104). All participants will sign a formal informed consent form. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and reported in appropriate meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2000031613. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7883861/ /pubmed/33579767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043385 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Patient-Centred Medicine
Zheng, Miao
Yin, Changlin
Cao, Ying
Zhang, Yonghui
Zhang, Kuoliang
Zhang, Xiaoqin
Bian, Wei
Wang, Lihua
Development and evaluation of a decision aid for family surrogate decision-makers for patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in ICUs: a study protocol
title Development and evaluation of a decision aid for family surrogate decision-makers for patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in ICUs: a study protocol
title_full Development and evaluation of a decision aid for family surrogate decision-makers for patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in ICUs: a study protocol
title_fullStr Development and evaluation of a decision aid for family surrogate decision-makers for patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in ICUs: a study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Development and evaluation of a decision aid for family surrogate decision-makers for patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in ICUs: a study protocol
title_short Development and evaluation of a decision aid for family surrogate decision-makers for patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in ICUs: a study protocol
title_sort development and evaluation of a decision aid for family surrogate decision-makers for patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (rrt) in icus: a study protocol
topic Patient-Centred Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7883861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33579767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043385
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengmiao developmentandevaluationofadecisionaidforfamilysurrogatedecisionmakersforpatientswithacutekidneyinjuryrequiringrenalreplacementtherapyrrtinicusastudyprotocol
AT yinchanglin developmentandevaluationofadecisionaidforfamilysurrogatedecisionmakersforpatientswithacutekidneyinjuryrequiringrenalreplacementtherapyrrtinicusastudyprotocol
AT caoying developmentandevaluationofadecisionaidforfamilysurrogatedecisionmakersforpatientswithacutekidneyinjuryrequiringrenalreplacementtherapyrrtinicusastudyprotocol
AT zhangyonghui developmentandevaluationofadecisionaidforfamilysurrogatedecisionmakersforpatientswithacutekidneyinjuryrequiringrenalreplacementtherapyrrtinicusastudyprotocol
AT zhangkuoliang developmentandevaluationofadecisionaidforfamilysurrogatedecisionmakersforpatientswithacutekidneyinjuryrequiringrenalreplacementtherapyrrtinicusastudyprotocol
AT zhangxiaoqin developmentandevaluationofadecisionaidforfamilysurrogatedecisionmakersforpatientswithacutekidneyinjuryrequiringrenalreplacementtherapyrrtinicusastudyprotocol
AT bianwei developmentandevaluationofadecisionaidforfamilysurrogatedecisionmakersforpatientswithacutekidneyinjuryrequiringrenalreplacementtherapyrrtinicusastudyprotocol
AT wanglihua developmentandevaluationofadecisionaidforfamilysurrogatedecisionmakersforpatientswithacutekidneyinjuryrequiringrenalreplacementtherapyrrtinicusastudyprotocol