Cargando…

“Guboow”—child abuse or traditional medical treatment? a case report

The examination of children suspected of being abused poses a great challenge for forensic pathologists. The risk of misjudgment is high and can have serious consequences for the child and the family. In unclear cases, an assessment should always be carried out on an interdisciplinary basis with the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lange-Herr, N., Rindlisbacher, A., Romano, F., Jackowski, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7884060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33590263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-021-02513-2
_version_ 1783651334446120960
author Lange-Herr, N.
Rindlisbacher, A.
Romano, F.
Jackowski, C.
author_facet Lange-Herr, N.
Rindlisbacher, A.
Romano, F.
Jackowski, C.
author_sort Lange-Herr, N.
collection PubMed
description The examination of children suspected of being abused poses a great challenge for forensic pathologists. The risk of misjudgment is high and can have serious consequences for the child and the family. In unclear cases, an assessment should always be carried out on an interdisciplinary basis with the involvement of the relevant disciplines such as pediatrics, dermatology, or radiology. We present the case of a 2.5-year-old boy who was presented by his parents at the Pediatric Emergency Department of a Swiss University Hospital due to fever and weight loss. During the physical examination, conspicuous findings on the abdomen were present, and the responsible emergency physicians informed the child protective services. A clinical forensic examination occurred on behalf of the child protection services. The abdomen of the child showed several symmetrical scars. The initial questioning of the parents did not provide clear information about the origin of the injuries. Further professional questioning of the family by the child protective services concluded that the injuries were the result of a traditional medical treatment in Somalia, which occurred several weeks before.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7884060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78840602021-02-16 “Guboow”—child abuse or traditional medical treatment? a case report Lange-Herr, N. Rindlisbacher, A. Romano, F. Jackowski, C. Int J Legal Med Case Report The examination of children suspected of being abused poses a great challenge for forensic pathologists. The risk of misjudgment is high and can have serious consequences for the child and the family. In unclear cases, an assessment should always be carried out on an interdisciplinary basis with the involvement of the relevant disciplines such as pediatrics, dermatology, or radiology. We present the case of a 2.5-year-old boy who was presented by his parents at the Pediatric Emergency Department of a Swiss University Hospital due to fever and weight loss. During the physical examination, conspicuous findings on the abdomen were present, and the responsible emergency physicians informed the child protective services. A clinical forensic examination occurred on behalf of the child protection services. The abdomen of the child showed several symmetrical scars. The initial questioning of the parents did not provide clear information about the origin of the injuries. Further professional questioning of the family by the child protective services concluded that the injuries were the result of a traditional medical treatment in Somalia, which occurred several weeks before. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-02-15 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7884060/ /pubmed/33590263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-021-02513-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Case Report
Lange-Herr, N.
Rindlisbacher, A.
Romano, F.
Jackowski, C.
“Guboow”—child abuse or traditional medical treatment? a case report
title “Guboow”—child abuse or traditional medical treatment? a case report
title_full “Guboow”—child abuse or traditional medical treatment? a case report
title_fullStr “Guboow”—child abuse or traditional medical treatment? a case report
title_full_unstemmed “Guboow”—child abuse or traditional medical treatment? a case report
title_short “Guboow”—child abuse or traditional medical treatment? a case report
title_sort “guboow”—child abuse or traditional medical treatment? a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7884060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33590263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-021-02513-2
work_keys_str_mv AT langeherrn guboowchildabuseortraditionalmedicaltreatmentacasereport
AT rindlisbachera guboowchildabuseortraditionalmedicaltreatmentacasereport
AT romanof guboowchildabuseortraditionalmedicaltreatmentacasereport
AT jackowskic guboowchildabuseortraditionalmedicaltreatmentacasereport