Cargando…

Perception of Game-Based Rehabilitation in Upper Limb Prosthetic Training: Survey of Users and Researchers

BACKGROUND: Serious games have been investigated for their use in multiple forms of rehabilitation for decades. The rising trend to use games for physical fitness in more recent years has also provided more options and garnered more interest for their use in physical rehabilitation and motor learnin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garske, Christian Alexander, Dyson, Matthew, Dupan, Sigrid, Nazarpour, Kianoush
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7884217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33522975
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/23710
_version_ 1783651365891866624
author Garske, Christian Alexander
Dyson, Matthew
Dupan, Sigrid
Nazarpour, Kianoush
author_facet Garske, Christian Alexander
Dyson, Matthew
Dupan, Sigrid
Nazarpour, Kianoush
author_sort Garske, Christian Alexander
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Serious games have been investigated for their use in multiple forms of rehabilitation for decades. The rising trend to use games for physical fitness in more recent years has also provided more options and garnered more interest for their use in physical rehabilitation and motor learning. In this study, we report the results of an opinion survey of serious games in upper limb prosthetic training. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates and contrasts the expectations and preferences for game-based prosthetic rehabilitation of people with limb difference and researchers. METHODS: Both participant groups answered open and closed questions as well as a questionnaire to assess their user types. The distribution of the user types was compared with a Pearson chi-square test against a sample population. The data were analyzed using the thematic framework method; answers fell within the themes of usability, training, and game design. Researchers shared their views on current challenges and what could be done to tackle these. RESULTS: A total of 14 people with limb difference and 12 researchers participated in this survey. The open questions resulted in an overview of the different views on prosthetic training games between the groups. The user types of people with limb difference and researchers were both significantly different from the sample population, with χ(2)(5)=12.3 and χ(2)(5)=26.5, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the respondents not only showed a general willingness and tentative optimism toward the topic but also acknowledged hurdles limiting the adoption of these games by both clinics and users. The results indicate a noteworthy difference between researchers and people with limb difference in their game preferences, which could lead to design choices that do not represent the target audience. Furthermore, focus on long-term in-home experiments is expected to shed more light on the validity of games in upper limb prosthetic rehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7884217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78842172021-03-10 Perception of Game-Based Rehabilitation in Upper Limb Prosthetic Training: Survey of Users and Researchers Garske, Christian Alexander Dyson, Matthew Dupan, Sigrid Nazarpour, Kianoush JMIR Serious Games Original Paper BACKGROUND: Serious games have been investigated for their use in multiple forms of rehabilitation for decades. The rising trend to use games for physical fitness in more recent years has also provided more options and garnered more interest for their use in physical rehabilitation and motor learning. In this study, we report the results of an opinion survey of serious games in upper limb prosthetic training. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates and contrasts the expectations and preferences for game-based prosthetic rehabilitation of people with limb difference and researchers. METHODS: Both participant groups answered open and closed questions as well as a questionnaire to assess their user types. The distribution of the user types was compared with a Pearson chi-square test against a sample population. The data were analyzed using the thematic framework method; answers fell within the themes of usability, training, and game design. Researchers shared their views on current challenges and what could be done to tackle these. RESULTS: A total of 14 people with limb difference and 12 researchers participated in this survey. The open questions resulted in an overview of the different views on prosthetic training games between the groups. The user types of people with limb difference and researchers were both significantly different from the sample population, with χ(2)(5)=12.3 and χ(2)(5)=26.5, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the respondents not only showed a general willingness and tentative optimism toward the topic but also acknowledged hurdles limiting the adoption of these games by both clinics and users. The results indicate a noteworthy difference between researchers and people with limb difference in their game preferences, which could lead to design choices that do not represent the target audience. Furthermore, focus on long-term in-home experiments is expected to shed more light on the validity of games in upper limb prosthetic rehabilitation. JMIR Publications 2021-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7884217/ /pubmed/33522975 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/23710 Text en ©Christian Alexander Garske, Matthew Dyson, Sigrid Dupan, Kianoush Nazarpour. Originally published in JMIR Serious Games (http://games.jmir.org), 01.02.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Serious Games, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://games.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Garske, Christian Alexander
Dyson, Matthew
Dupan, Sigrid
Nazarpour, Kianoush
Perception of Game-Based Rehabilitation in Upper Limb Prosthetic Training: Survey of Users and Researchers
title Perception of Game-Based Rehabilitation in Upper Limb Prosthetic Training: Survey of Users and Researchers
title_full Perception of Game-Based Rehabilitation in Upper Limb Prosthetic Training: Survey of Users and Researchers
title_fullStr Perception of Game-Based Rehabilitation in Upper Limb Prosthetic Training: Survey of Users and Researchers
title_full_unstemmed Perception of Game-Based Rehabilitation in Upper Limb Prosthetic Training: Survey of Users and Researchers
title_short Perception of Game-Based Rehabilitation in Upper Limb Prosthetic Training: Survey of Users and Researchers
title_sort perception of game-based rehabilitation in upper limb prosthetic training: survey of users and researchers
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7884217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33522975
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/23710
work_keys_str_mv AT garskechristianalexander perceptionofgamebasedrehabilitationinupperlimbprosthetictrainingsurveyofusersandresearchers
AT dysonmatthew perceptionofgamebasedrehabilitationinupperlimbprosthetictrainingsurveyofusersandresearchers
AT dupansigrid perceptionofgamebasedrehabilitationinupperlimbprosthetictrainingsurveyofusersandresearchers
AT nazarpourkianoush perceptionofgamebasedrehabilitationinupperlimbprosthetictrainingsurveyofusersandresearchers