Cargando…

Multicenter evaluation of the Panbio™ COVID-19 rapid antigen-detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection

OBJECTIVES: The standard RT-PCR assay for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is laborious and time-consuming, limiting testing availability. Rapid antigen-detection tests are faster and less expensive; however, the reliability of these tests must be validated before they can be used widely. The obj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merino, Paloma, Guinea, Jesús, Muñoz-Gallego, Irene, González-Donapetry, Patricia, Galán, Juan Carlos, Antona, Nerea, Cilla, Gustavo, Hernáez-Crespo, Silvia, Díaz-de Tuesta, José Luis, Gual-de Torrella, Ana, González-Romo, Fernando, Escribano, Pilar, Sánchez-Castellano, Miguel Ángel, Sota-Busselo, Mercedes, Delgado-Iribarren, Alberto, García, Julio, Cantón, Rafael, Muñoz, Patricia, Folgueira, María Dolores, Cuenca-Estrella, Manuel, Oteo-Iglesias, Jesús
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7884234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33601009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2021.02.001
_version_ 1783651369891135488
author Merino, Paloma
Guinea, Jesús
Muñoz-Gallego, Irene
González-Donapetry, Patricia
Galán, Juan Carlos
Antona, Nerea
Cilla, Gustavo
Hernáez-Crespo, Silvia
Díaz-de Tuesta, José Luis
Gual-de Torrella, Ana
González-Romo, Fernando
Escribano, Pilar
Sánchez-Castellano, Miguel Ángel
Sota-Busselo, Mercedes
Delgado-Iribarren, Alberto
García, Julio
Cantón, Rafael
Muñoz, Patricia
Folgueira, María Dolores
Cuenca-Estrella, Manuel
Oteo-Iglesias, Jesús
author_facet Merino, Paloma
Guinea, Jesús
Muñoz-Gallego, Irene
González-Donapetry, Patricia
Galán, Juan Carlos
Antona, Nerea
Cilla, Gustavo
Hernáez-Crespo, Silvia
Díaz-de Tuesta, José Luis
Gual-de Torrella, Ana
González-Romo, Fernando
Escribano, Pilar
Sánchez-Castellano, Miguel Ángel
Sota-Busselo, Mercedes
Delgado-Iribarren, Alberto
García, Julio
Cantón, Rafael
Muñoz, Patricia
Folgueira, María Dolores
Cuenca-Estrella, Manuel
Oteo-Iglesias, Jesús
author_sort Merino, Paloma
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The standard RT-PCR assay for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is laborious and time-consuming, limiting testing availability. Rapid antigen-detection tests are faster and less expensive; however, the reliability of these tests must be validated before they can be used widely. The objective of this study was to determine the performance of the Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device (PanbioRT) (Abbott) in detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in nasopharyngeal swab specimens. METHODS: This prospective multicentre study was carried out in ten Spanish university hospitals and included individuals with clinical symptoms or epidemiological criteria of COVID-19. Only individuals with ≤7 days from the onset of symptoms or from exposure to a confirmed case of COVID-19 were included. Two nasopharyngeal samples were taken to perform the PanbioRT as a point-of-care test and a diagnostic RT-PCR test. RESULTS: Among the 958 patients studied, 325 (90.5%) had true-positive results. The overall sensitivity and specificity for the PanbioRT were 90.5% (95%CI 87.5–93.6) and 98.8% (95%CI 98–99.7), respectively. Sensitivity in participants who had a threshold cycle (C(T)) < 25 for the RT-PCR test was 99.5% (95%CI 98.4–100), and in participants with ≤5 days of the clinical course it was 91.8% (95%CI 88.8–94.8). Agreement between techniques was 95.7% (κ score 0.90; 95%CI 0.88–0.93). CONCLUSIONS: The PanbioRT performs well clinically, with even more reliable results for patients with a shorter clinical course of the disease or a higher viral load. The results must be interpreted based on the local epidemiological context.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7884234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78842342021-02-16 Multicenter evaluation of the Panbio™ COVID-19 rapid antigen-detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection Merino, Paloma Guinea, Jesús Muñoz-Gallego, Irene González-Donapetry, Patricia Galán, Juan Carlos Antona, Nerea Cilla, Gustavo Hernáez-Crespo, Silvia Díaz-de Tuesta, José Luis Gual-de Torrella, Ana González-Romo, Fernando Escribano, Pilar Sánchez-Castellano, Miguel Ángel Sota-Busselo, Mercedes Delgado-Iribarren, Alberto García, Julio Cantón, Rafael Muñoz, Patricia Folgueira, María Dolores Cuenca-Estrella, Manuel Oteo-Iglesias, Jesús Clin Microbiol Infect Original Article OBJECTIVES: The standard RT-PCR assay for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is laborious and time-consuming, limiting testing availability. Rapid antigen-detection tests are faster and less expensive; however, the reliability of these tests must be validated before they can be used widely. The objective of this study was to determine the performance of the Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device (PanbioRT) (Abbott) in detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in nasopharyngeal swab specimens. METHODS: This prospective multicentre study was carried out in ten Spanish university hospitals and included individuals with clinical symptoms or epidemiological criteria of COVID-19. Only individuals with ≤7 days from the onset of symptoms or from exposure to a confirmed case of COVID-19 were included. Two nasopharyngeal samples were taken to perform the PanbioRT as a point-of-care test and a diagnostic RT-PCR test. RESULTS: Among the 958 patients studied, 325 (90.5%) had true-positive results. The overall sensitivity and specificity for the PanbioRT were 90.5% (95%CI 87.5–93.6) and 98.8% (95%CI 98–99.7), respectively. Sensitivity in participants who had a threshold cycle (C(T)) < 25 for the RT-PCR test was 99.5% (95%CI 98.4–100), and in participants with ≤5 days of the clinical course it was 91.8% (95%CI 88.8–94.8). Agreement between techniques was 95.7% (κ score 0.90; 95%CI 0.88–0.93). CONCLUSIONS: The PanbioRT performs well clinically, with even more reliable results for patients with a shorter clinical course of the disease or a higher viral load. The results must be interpreted based on the local epidemiological context. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021-05 2021-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7884234/ /pubmed/33601009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2021.02.001 Text en © 2021 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Original Article
Merino, Paloma
Guinea, Jesús
Muñoz-Gallego, Irene
González-Donapetry, Patricia
Galán, Juan Carlos
Antona, Nerea
Cilla, Gustavo
Hernáez-Crespo, Silvia
Díaz-de Tuesta, José Luis
Gual-de Torrella, Ana
González-Romo, Fernando
Escribano, Pilar
Sánchez-Castellano, Miguel Ángel
Sota-Busselo, Mercedes
Delgado-Iribarren, Alberto
García, Julio
Cantón, Rafael
Muñoz, Patricia
Folgueira, María Dolores
Cuenca-Estrella, Manuel
Oteo-Iglesias, Jesús
Multicenter evaluation of the Panbio™ COVID-19 rapid antigen-detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection
title Multicenter evaluation of the Panbio™ COVID-19 rapid antigen-detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection
title_full Multicenter evaluation of the Panbio™ COVID-19 rapid antigen-detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection
title_fullStr Multicenter evaluation of the Panbio™ COVID-19 rapid antigen-detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection
title_full_unstemmed Multicenter evaluation of the Panbio™ COVID-19 rapid antigen-detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection
title_short Multicenter evaluation of the Panbio™ COVID-19 rapid antigen-detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection
title_sort multicenter evaluation of the panbio™ covid-19 rapid antigen-detection test for the diagnosis of sars-cov-2 infection
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7884234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33601009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2021.02.001
work_keys_str_mv AT merinopaloma multicenterevaluationofthepanbiocovid19rapidantigendetectiontestforthediagnosisofsarscov2infection
AT guineajesus multicenterevaluationofthepanbiocovid19rapidantigendetectiontestforthediagnosisofsarscov2infection
AT munozgallegoirene multicenterevaluationofthepanbiocovid19rapidantigendetectiontestforthediagnosisofsarscov2infection
AT gonzalezdonapetrypatricia multicenterevaluationofthepanbiocovid19rapidantigendetectiontestforthediagnosisofsarscov2infection
AT galanjuancarlos multicenterevaluationofthepanbiocovid19rapidantigendetectiontestforthediagnosisofsarscov2infection
AT antonanerea multicenterevaluationofthepanbiocovid19rapidantigendetectiontestforthediagnosisofsarscov2infection
AT cillagustavo multicenterevaluationofthepanbiocovid19rapidantigendetectiontestforthediagnosisofsarscov2infection
AT hernaezcresposilvia multicenterevaluationofthepanbiocovid19rapidantigendetectiontestforthediagnosisofsarscov2infection
AT diazdetuestajoseluis multicenterevaluationofthepanbiocovid19rapidantigendetectiontestforthediagnosisofsarscov2infection
AT gualdetorrellaana multicenterevaluationofthepanbiocovid19rapidantigendetectiontestforthediagnosisofsarscov2infection
AT gonzalezromofernando multicenterevaluationofthepanbiocovid19rapidantigendetectiontestforthediagnosisofsarscov2infection
AT escribanopilar multicenterevaluationofthepanbiocovid19rapidantigendetectiontestforthediagnosisofsarscov2infection
AT sanchezcastellanomiguelangel multicenterevaluationofthepanbiocovid19rapidantigendetectiontestforthediagnosisofsarscov2infection
AT sotabusselomercedes multicenterevaluationofthepanbiocovid19rapidantigendetectiontestforthediagnosisofsarscov2infection
AT delgadoiribarrenalberto multicenterevaluationofthepanbiocovid19rapidantigendetectiontestforthediagnosisofsarscov2infection
AT garciajulio multicenterevaluationofthepanbiocovid19rapidantigendetectiontestforthediagnosisofsarscov2infection
AT cantonrafael multicenterevaluationofthepanbiocovid19rapidantigendetectiontestforthediagnosisofsarscov2infection
AT munozpatricia multicenterevaluationofthepanbiocovid19rapidantigendetectiontestforthediagnosisofsarscov2infection
AT folgueiramariadolores multicenterevaluationofthepanbiocovid19rapidantigendetectiontestforthediagnosisofsarscov2infection
AT cuencaestrellamanuel multicenterevaluationofthepanbiocovid19rapidantigendetectiontestforthediagnosisofsarscov2infection
AT oteoiglesiasjesus multicenterevaluationofthepanbiocovid19rapidantigendetectiontestforthediagnosisofsarscov2infection
AT multicenterevaluationofthepanbiocovid19rapidantigendetectiontestforthediagnosisofsarscov2infection