Cargando…

Correction for the Influence of Cataract on Macular Pigment Measurement by Autofluorescence Technique Using Deep Learning

PURPOSE: Measurements of macular pigment optical density (MPOD) by the autofluorescence technique yield underestimations of actual values in eyes with cataract. We applied deep learning (DL) to correct this error. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: MPOD was measured by SPECTRALIS (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Obana, Akira, Ote, Kibo, Hashimoto, Fumio, Asaoka, Ryo, Gohto, Yuko, Okazaki, Shigetoshi, Yamada, Hidenao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7884288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34003903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.2.18
_version_ 1783651381067907072
author Obana, Akira
Ote, Kibo
Hashimoto, Fumio
Asaoka, Ryo
Gohto, Yuko
Okazaki, Shigetoshi
Yamada, Hidenao
author_facet Obana, Akira
Ote, Kibo
Hashimoto, Fumio
Asaoka, Ryo
Gohto, Yuko
Okazaki, Shigetoshi
Yamada, Hidenao
author_sort Obana, Akira
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Measurements of macular pigment optical density (MPOD) by the autofluorescence technique yield underestimations of actual values in eyes with cataract. We applied deep learning (DL) to correct this error. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: MPOD was measured by SPECTRALIS (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) in 197 eyes before and after cataract surgery. The nominal MPOD values (= preoperative value) were corrected by three methods: the regression equation (RE) method, subjective classification (SC) method (described in our previous study), and DL method. The errors between the corrected and true values (= postoperative value) were calculated for local MPODs at 0.25°, 0.5°, 1°, and 2° eccentricities and macular pigment optical volume (MPOV) within 9° eccentricity. RESULTS: The mean error for MPODs at four eccentricities was 32% without any correction, 15% with correction by RE, 16% with correction by SC, and 14% with correction by DL. The mean error for MPOV was 21% without correction and 14%, 10%, and 10%, respectively, with correction by the same methods. The errors with any correction were significantly lower than those without correction (P < 0.001, linear mixed model with Tukey's test). The errors with DL correction were significantly lower than those with RE correction in MPOD at 1° eccentricity and MPOV (P < 0.001) and were equivalent to those with SC correction. CONCLUSIONS: The objective method using DL was useful to correct MPOD values measured in aged people. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: MPOD can be obtained with small errors in eyes with cataract using DL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7884288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78842882021-02-22 Correction for the Influence of Cataract on Macular Pigment Measurement by Autofluorescence Technique Using Deep Learning Obana, Akira Ote, Kibo Hashimoto, Fumio Asaoka, Ryo Gohto, Yuko Okazaki, Shigetoshi Yamada, Hidenao Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: Measurements of macular pigment optical density (MPOD) by the autofluorescence technique yield underestimations of actual values in eyes with cataract. We applied deep learning (DL) to correct this error. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: MPOD was measured by SPECTRALIS (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) in 197 eyes before and after cataract surgery. The nominal MPOD values (= preoperative value) were corrected by three methods: the regression equation (RE) method, subjective classification (SC) method (described in our previous study), and DL method. The errors between the corrected and true values (= postoperative value) were calculated for local MPODs at 0.25°, 0.5°, 1°, and 2° eccentricities and macular pigment optical volume (MPOV) within 9° eccentricity. RESULTS: The mean error for MPODs at four eccentricities was 32% without any correction, 15% with correction by RE, 16% with correction by SC, and 14% with correction by DL. The mean error for MPOV was 21% without correction and 14%, 10%, and 10%, respectively, with correction by the same methods. The errors with any correction were significantly lower than those without correction (P < 0.001, linear mixed model with Tukey's test). The errors with DL correction were significantly lower than those with RE correction in MPOD at 1° eccentricity and MPOV (P < 0.001) and were equivalent to those with SC correction. CONCLUSIONS: The objective method using DL was useful to correct MPOD values measured in aged people. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: MPOD can be obtained with small errors in eyes with cataract using DL. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7884288/ /pubmed/34003903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.2.18 Text en Copyright 2021 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Obana, Akira
Ote, Kibo
Hashimoto, Fumio
Asaoka, Ryo
Gohto, Yuko
Okazaki, Shigetoshi
Yamada, Hidenao
Correction for the Influence of Cataract on Macular Pigment Measurement by Autofluorescence Technique Using Deep Learning
title Correction for the Influence of Cataract on Macular Pigment Measurement by Autofluorescence Technique Using Deep Learning
title_full Correction for the Influence of Cataract on Macular Pigment Measurement by Autofluorescence Technique Using Deep Learning
title_fullStr Correction for the Influence of Cataract on Macular Pigment Measurement by Autofluorescence Technique Using Deep Learning
title_full_unstemmed Correction for the Influence of Cataract on Macular Pigment Measurement by Autofluorescence Technique Using Deep Learning
title_short Correction for the Influence of Cataract on Macular Pigment Measurement by Autofluorescence Technique Using Deep Learning
title_sort correction for the influence of cataract on macular pigment measurement by autofluorescence technique using deep learning
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7884288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34003903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.2.18
work_keys_str_mv AT obanaakira correctionfortheinfluenceofcataractonmacularpigmentmeasurementbyautofluorescencetechniqueusingdeeplearning
AT otekibo correctionfortheinfluenceofcataractonmacularpigmentmeasurementbyautofluorescencetechniqueusingdeeplearning
AT hashimotofumio correctionfortheinfluenceofcataractonmacularpigmentmeasurementbyautofluorescencetechniqueusingdeeplearning
AT asaokaryo correctionfortheinfluenceofcataractonmacularpigmentmeasurementbyautofluorescencetechniqueusingdeeplearning
AT gohtoyuko correctionfortheinfluenceofcataractonmacularpigmentmeasurementbyautofluorescencetechniqueusingdeeplearning
AT okazakishigetoshi correctionfortheinfluenceofcataractonmacularpigmentmeasurementbyautofluorescencetechniqueusingdeeplearning
AT yamadahidenao correctionfortheinfluenceofcataractonmacularpigmentmeasurementbyautofluorescencetechniqueusingdeeplearning