Cargando…

Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Between Single-Morula Embryo Transfer and Single-Blastocyst Transfer in Fresh IVF/ICSI Cycles

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the effectiveness and feasibility of day 4 (D4) morula embryo transfer (ET) in comparison with day 5 (D5) blastocyst ET, with regards to their clinical data, laboratory test results, and pregnancy outcomes. MATERIAL/METHODS: This retrospective cohort study enrolle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Hui-na, Ying, Ying-fen, Xi, Hai-tao, Lu, Xiao-sheng, Zhao, Jun-zhao, Chen, Yi-lu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7884499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33566796
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.928737
_version_ 1783651427254534144
author Zhang, Hui-na
Ying, Ying-fen
Xi, Hai-tao
Lu, Xiao-sheng
Zhao, Jun-zhao
Chen, Yi-lu
author_facet Zhang, Hui-na
Ying, Ying-fen
Xi, Hai-tao
Lu, Xiao-sheng
Zhao, Jun-zhao
Chen, Yi-lu
author_sort Zhang, Hui-na
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study investigated the effectiveness and feasibility of day 4 (D4) morula embryo transfer (ET) in comparison with day 5 (D5) blastocyst ET, with regards to their clinical data, laboratory test results, and pregnancy outcomes. MATERIAL/METHODS: This retrospective cohort study enrolled 1070 patients, including 178 cases in group D4 and 892 cases in group D5. The endpoint was live birth rate after fresh embryo transfer. Furthermore, the clinical outcomes of D4 embryos with different morphology were compared and assigned to 3 groups: in group 1 (n=66) the embryos were compacted but not expanded, in group 2 (n=102) the embryos were compacted and expanded (early blastocyst), and in group 3 (n=10) the embryos were not compacted. RESULTS: Groups D4 and D5 had comparable clinical pregnancy rates (53.37% vs 59.97%) and live birth rates (43.25% vs 50.89%), and there were no significant differences between the 2 groups. In group 3, there was only 1 clinical pregnancy and no live birth. In comparison between group 1 and group 2, the clinical pregnancy rate of group 2 showed an upward trend (48.48% vs 60.78%), but there was no significant difference. There was also no statistically significant difference in the live birth rate between the 2 groups (42.42% vs 49.01%). CONCLUSIONS: Transferring of compacted embryos or early blastocysts can result in high clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates. In addition to the cleavage and blastocyst ET, morula ET may serve as an alternative option for the clinician.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7884499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78844992021-03-04 Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Between Single-Morula Embryo Transfer and Single-Blastocyst Transfer in Fresh IVF/ICSI Cycles Zhang, Hui-na Ying, Ying-fen Xi, Hai-tao Lu, Xiao-sheng Zhao, Jun-zhao Chen, Yi-lu Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: This study investigated the effectiveness and feasibility of day 4 (D4) morula embryo transfer (ET) in comparison with day 5 (D5) blastocyst ET, with regards to their clinical data, laboratory test results, and pregnancy outcomes. MATERIAL/METHODS: This retrospective cohort study enrolled 1070 patients, including 178 cases in group D4 and 892 cases in group D5. The endpoint was live birth rate after fresh embryo transfer. Furthermore, the clinical outcomes of D4 embryos with different morphology were compared and assigned to 3 groups: in group 1 (n=66) the embryos were compacted but not expanded, in group 2 (n=102) the embryos were compacted and expanded (early blastocyst), and in group 3 (n=10) the embryos were not compacted. RESULTS: Groups D4 and D5 had comparable clinical pregnancy rates (53.37% vs 59.97%) and live birth rates (43.25% vs 50.89%), and there were no significant differences between the 2 groups. In group 3, there was only 1 clinical pregnancy and no live birth. In comparison between group 1 and group 2, the clinical pregnancy rate of group 2 showed an upward trend (48.48% vs 60.78%), but there was no significant difference. There was also no statistically significant difference in the live birth rate between the 2 groups (42.42% vs 49.01%). CONCLUSIONS: Transferring of compacted embryos or early blastocysts can result in high clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates. In addition to the cleavage and blastocyst ET, morula ET may serve as an alternative option for the clinician. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2021-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7884499/ /pubmed/33566796 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.928737 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2021 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Zhang, Hui-na
Ying, Ying-fen
Xi, Hai-tao
Lu, Xiao-sheng
Zhao, Jun-zhao
Chen, Yi-lu
Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Between Single-Morula Embryo Transfer and Single-Blastocyst Transfer in Fresh IVF/ICSI Cycles
title Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Between Single-Morula Embryo Transfer and Single-Blastocyst Transfer in Fresh IVF/ICSI Cycles
title_full Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Between Single-Morula Embryo Transfer and Single-Blastocyst Transfer in Fresh IVF/ICSI Cycles
title_fullStr Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Between Single-Morula Embryo Transfer and Single-Blastocyst Transfer in Fresh IVF/ICSI Cycles
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Between Single-Morula Embryo Transfer and Single-Blastocyst Transfer in Fresh IVF/ICSI Cycles
title_short Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Between Single-Morula Embryo Transfer and Single-Blastocyst Transfer in Fresh IVF/ICSI Cycles
title_sort comparison of pregnancy outcomes between single-morula embryo transfer and single-blastocyst transfer in fresh ivf/icsi cycles
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7884499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33566796
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.928737
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanghuina comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesbetweensinglemorulaembryotransferandsingleblastocysttransferinfreshivficsicycles
AT yingyingfen comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesbetweensinglemorulaembryotransferandsingleblastocysttransferinfreshivficsicycles
AT xihaitao comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesbetweensinglemorulaembryotransferandsingleblastocysttransferinfreshivficsicycles
AT luxiaosheng comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesbetweensinglemorulaembryotransferandsingleblastocysttransferinfreshivficsicycles
AT zhaojunzhao comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesbetweensinglemorulaembryotransferandsingleblastocysttransferinfreshivficsicycles
AT chenyilu comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesbetweensinglemorulaembryotransferandsingleblastocysttransferinfreshivficsicycles