Cargando…
Reexamining Health-Care Coalitions in Light of COVID-19
The national response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted critical weaknesses in domestic health care and public health emergency preparedness, despite nearly 2 decades of federal funding for multiple programs designed to encourage cross-cutting collaboration in emerg...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7884654/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33143803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.431 |
_version_ | 1783651454443061248 |
---|---|
author | Barnett, Daniel J. Knieser, Lauren Errett, Nicole A. Rosenblum, Andrew J. Seshamani, Meena Kirsch, Thomas D. |
author_facet | Barnett, Daniel J. Knieser, Lauren Errett, Nicole A. Rosenblum, Andrew J. Seshamani, Meena Kirsch, Thomas D. |
author_sort | Barnett, Daniel J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The national response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted critical weaknesses in domestic health care and public health emergency preparedness, despite nearly 2 decades of federal funding for multiple programs designed to encourage cross-cutting collaboration in emergency response. Health-care coalitions (HCCs), which are funded through the Hospital Preparedness Program, were first piloted in 2007 and have been continuously funded nationwide since 2012 to support broad collaborations across public health, emergency management, emergency medical services, and the emergency response arms of the health-care system within a geographical area. This commentary provides a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis to summarize the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats related to the current HCC model against the backdrop of COVID-19. We close with concrete recommendations for better leveraging the HCC model for improved health-care system readiness. These include better evaluating the role of HCCs and their members (including the responsibility of the HCC to better communicate and align with other sectors), reconsidering the existing framework for HCC administration, increasing incentives for meaningful community participation in HCC preparedness, and supporting next-generation development of health-care preparedness systems for future pandemics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7884654 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78846542021-02-16 Reexamining Health-Care Coalitions in Light of COVID-19 Barnett, Daniel J. Knieser, Lauren Errett, Nicole A. Rosenblum, Andrew J. Seshamani, Meena Kirsch, Thomas D. Disaster Med Public Health Prep Policy Analysis The national response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted critical weaknesses in domestic health care and public health emergency preparedness, despite nearly 2 decades of federal funding for multiple programs designed to encourage cross-cutting collaboration in emergency response. Health-care coalitions (HCCs), which are funded through the Hospital Preparedness Program, were first piloted in 2007 and have been continuously funded nationwide since 2012 to support broad collaborations across public health, emergency management, emergency medical services, and the emergency response arms of the health-care system within a geographical area. This commentary provides a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis to summarize the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats related to the current HCC model against the backdrop of COVID-19. We close with concrete recommendations for better leveraging the HCC model for improved health-care system readiness. These include better evaluating the role of HCCs and their members (including the responsibility of the HCC to better communicate and align with other sectors), reconsidering the existing framework for HCC administration, increasing incentives for meaningful community participation in HCC preparedness, and supporting next-generation development of health-care preparedness systems for future pandemics. Cambridge University Press 2020-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7884654/ /pubmed/33143803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.431 Text en © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Policy Analysis Barnett, Daniel J. Knieser, Lauren Errett, Nicole A. Rosenblum, Andrew J. Seshamani, Meena Kirsch, Thomas D. Reexamining Health-Care Coalitions in Light of COVID-19 |
title | Reexamining Health-Care Coalitions in Light of COVID-19 |
title_full | Reexamining Health-Care Coalitions in Light of COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | Reexamining Health-Care Coalitions in Light of COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Reexamining Health-Care Coalitions in Light of COVID-19 |
title_short | Reexamining Health-Care Coalitions in Light of COVID-19 |
title_sort | reexamining health-care coalitions in light of covid-19 |
topic | Policy Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7884654/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33143803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.431 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barnettdanielj reexamininghealthcarecoalitionsinlightofcovid19 AT knieserlauren reexamininghealthcarecoalitionsinlightofcovid19 AT errettnicolea reexamininghealthcarecoalitionsinlightofcovid19 AT rosenblumandrewj reexamininghealthcarecoalitionsinlightofcovid19 AT seshamanimeena reexamininghealthcarecoalitionsinlightofcovid19 AT kirschthomasd reexamininghealthcarecoalitionsinlightofcovid19 |