Cargando…

Reexamining Health-Care Coalitions in Light of COVID-19

The national response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted critical weaknesses in domestic health care and public health emergency preparedness, despite nearly 2 decades of federal funding for multiple programs designed to encourage cross-cutting collaboration in emerg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barnett, Daniel J., Knieser, Lauren, Errett, Nicole A., Rosenblum, Andrew J., Seshamani, Meena, Kirsch, Thomas D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7884654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33143803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.431
_version_ 1783651454443061248
author Barnett, Daniel J.
Knieser, Lauren
Errett, Nicole A.
Rosenblum, Andrew J.
Seshamani, Meena
Kirsch, Thomas D.
author_facet Barnett, Daniel J.
Knieser, Lauren
Errett, Nicole A.
Rosenblum, Andrew J.
Seshamani, Meena
Kirsch, Thomas D.
author_sort Barnett, Daniel J.
collection PubMed
description The national response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted critical weaknesses in domestic health care and public health emergency preparedness, despite nearly 2 decades of federal funding for multiple programs designed to encourage cross-cutting collaboration in emergency response. Health-care coalitions (HCCs), which are funded through the Hospital Preparedness Program, were first piloted in 2007 and have been continuously funded nationwide since 2012 to support broad collaborations across public health, emergency management, emergency medical services, and the emergency response arms of the health-care system within a geographical area. This commentary provides a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis to summarize the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats related to the current HCC model against the backdrop of COVID-19. We close with concrete recommendations for better leveraging the HCC model for improved health-care system readiness. These include better evaluating the role of HCCs and their members (including the responsibility of the HCC to better communicate and align with other sectors), reconsidering the existing framework for HCC administration, increasing incentives for meaningful community participation in HCC preparedness, and supporting next-generation development of health-care preparedness systems for future pandemics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7884654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78846542021-02-16 Reexamining Health-Care Coalitions in Light of COVID-19 Barnett, Daniel J. Knieser, Lauren Errett, Nicole A. Rosenblum, Andrew J. Seshamani, Meena Kirsch, Thomas D. Disaster Med Public Health Prep Policy Analysis The national response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted critical weaknesses in domestic health care and public health emergency preparedness, despite nearly 2 decades of federal funding for multiple programs designed to encourage cross-cutting collaboration in emergency response. Health-care coalitions (HCCs), which are funded through the Hospital Preparedness Program, were first piloted in 2007 and have been continuously funded nationwide since 2012 to support broad collaborations across public health, emergency management, emergency medical services, and the emergency response arms of the health-care system within a geographical area. This commentary provides a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis to summarize the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats related to the current HCC model against the backdrop of COVID-19. We close with concrete recommendations for better leveraging the HCC model for improved health-care system readiness. These include better evaluating the role of HCCs and their members (including the responsibility of the HCC to better communicate and align with other sectors), reconsidering the existing framework for HCC administration, increasing incentives for meaningful community participation in HCC preparedness, and supporting next-generation development of health-care preparedness systems for future pandemics. Cambridge University Press 2020-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7884654/ /pubmed/33143803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.431 Text en © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Policy Analysis
Barnett, Daniel J.
Knieser, Lauren
Errett, Nicole A.
Rosenblum, Andrew J.
Seshamani, Meena
Kirsch, Thomas D.
Reexamining Health-Care Coalitions in Light of COVID-19
title Reexamining Health-Care Coalitions in Light of COVID-19
title_full Reexamining Health-Care Coalitions in Light of COVID-19
title_fullStr Reexamining Health-Care Coalitions in Light of COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Reexamining Health-Care Coalitions in Light of COVID-19
title_short Reexamining Health-Care Coalitions in Light of COVID-19
title_sort reexamining health-care coalitions in light of covid-19
topic Policy Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7884654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33143803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.431
work_keys_str_mv AT barnettdanielj reexamininghealthcarecoalitionsinlightofcovid19
AT knieserlauren reexamininghealthcarecoalitionsinlightofcovid19
AT errettnicolea reexamininghealthcarecoalitionsinlightofcovid19
AT rosenblumandrewj reexamininghealthcarecoalitionsinlightofcovid19
AT seshamanimeena reexamininghealthcarecoalitionsinlightofcovid19
AT kirschthomasd reexamininghealthcarecoalitionsinlightofcovid19