Cargando…
Using a variant of the optomotor response as a visual defect detection assay in zebrafish
We describe a visual stimulus that can be used with both larval and adult zebrafish (Danio rerio). This protocol is a modification of a standard visual behavior analysis, the optomotor response (OMR). The OMR is often used to determine the spatial response or to detect directional visuomotor deficie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Journal of Biological Methods
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7884848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33604396 http://dx.doi.org/10.14440/jbm.2021.341 |
_version_ | 1783651498643685376 |
---|---|
author | LeFauve, Matthew K. Rowe, Cassie J. Crowley-Perry, Mikayla Wiegand, Jenna L. Shapiro, Arthur G. Connaughton, Victoria P. |
author_facet | LeFauve, Matthew K. Rowe, Cassie J. Crowley-Perry, Mikayla Wiegand, Jenna L. Shapiro, Arthur G. Connaughton, Victoria P. |
author_sort | LeFauve, Matthew K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We describe a visual stimulus that can be used with both larval and adult zebrafish (Danio rerio). This protocol is a modification of a standard visual behavior analysis, the optomotor response (OMR). The OMR is often used to determine the spatial response or to detect directional visuomotor deficiencies. An OMR can be generated using a high contrast grated pattern, typically vertical bars. The spatial sensitivity is measured by detection and response to a change in grating bar width and is reported in cycles per degree (CPD). This test has been used extensively with zebrafish larvae and adults to identify visual- and/or motor-based mutations. Historically, when tested in adults, the grated pattern was presented from a vertical perspective, using a rotating cylinder around a holding tank, allowing the grating to be seen solely from the sides and front of the organism. In contrast, OMRs in zebrafish larvae are elicited using a stimulus projected below the fish. This difference in methodology means that two different experimental set-ups are required: one for adults and one for larvae. Our visual stimulus modifies the stimulation format so that a single OMR stimulus, suitable for use with both adults and larvae, is being presented underneath the fish. Analysis of visuomotor responses using this method does not require costly behavioral tracking software and, using a single behavioral paradigm, allows the observer to rapidly determine visual spatial response in both zebrafish larvae and adults. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7884848 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Journal of Biological Methods |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78848482021-02-17 Using a variant of the optomotor response as a visual defect detection assay in zebrafish LeFauve, Matthew K. Rowe, Cassie J. Crowley-Perry, Mikayla Wiegand, Jenna L. Shapiro, Arthur G. Connaughton, Victoria P. J Biol Methods Protocol We describe a visual stimulus that can be used with both larval and adult zebrafish (Danio rerio). This protocol is a modification of a standard visual behavior analysis, the optomotor response (OMR). The OMR is often used to determine the spatial response or to detect directional visuomotor deficiencies. An OMR can be generated using a high contrast grated pattern, typically vertical bars. The spatial sensitivity is measured by detection and response to a change in grating bar width and is reported in cycles per degree (CPD). This test has been used extensively with zebrafish larvae and adults to identify visual- and/or motor-based mutations. Historically, when tested in adults, the grated pattern was presented from a vertical perspective, using a rotating cylinder around a holding tank, allowing the grating to be seen solely from the sides and front of the organism. In contrast, OMRs in zebrafish larvae are elicited using a stimulus projected below the fish. This difference in methodology means that two different experimental set-ups are required: one for adults and one for larvae. Our visual stimulus modifies the stimulation format so that a single OMR stimulus, suitable for use with both adults and larvae, is being presented underneath the fish. Analysis of visuomotor responses using this method does not require costly behavioral tracking software and, using a single behavioral paradigm, allows the observer to rapidly determine visual spatial response in both zebrafish larvae and adults. Journal of Biological Methods 2021-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7884848/ /pubmed/33604396 http://dx.doi.org/10.14440/jbm.2021.341 Text en © 2013-2021 The Journal of Biological Methods, All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Protocol LeFauve, Matthew K. Rowe, Cassie J. Crowley-Perry, Mikayla Wiegand, Jenna L. Shapiro, Arthur G. Connaughton, Victoria P. Using a variant of the optomotor response as a visual defect detection assay in zebrafish |
title | Using a variant of the optomotor response as a visual defect detection assay in zebrafish |
title_full | Using a variant of the optomotor response as a visual defect detection assay in zebrafish |
title_fullStr | Using a variant of the optomotor response as a visual defect detection assay in zebrafish |
title_full_unstemmed | Using a variant of the optomotor response as a visual defect detection assay in zebrafish |
title_short | Using a variant of the optomotor response as a visual defect detection assay in zebrafish |
title_sort | using a variant of the optomotor response as a visual defect detection assay in zebrafish |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7884848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33604396 http://dx.doi.org/10.14440/jbm.2021.341 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lefauvematthewk usingavariantoftheoptomotorresponseasavisualdefectdetectionassayinzebrafish AT rowecassiej usingavariantoftheoptomotorresponseasavisualdefectdetectionassayinzebrafish AT crowleyperrymikayla usingavariantoftheoptomotorresponseasavisualdefectdetectionassayinzebrafish AT wiegandjennal usingavariantoftheoptomotorresponseasavisualdefectdetectionassayinzebrafish AT shapiroarthurg usingavariantoftheoptomotorresponseasavisualdefectdetectionassayinzebrafish AT connaughtonvictoriap usingavariantoftheoptomotorresponseasavisualdefectdetectionassayinzebrafish |