Cargando…

Using a variant of the optomotor response as a visual defect detection assay in zebrafish

We describe a visual stimulus that can be used with both larval and adult zebrafish (Danio rerio). This protocol is a modification of a standard visual behavior analysis, the optomotor response (OMR). The OMR is often used to determine the spatial response or to detect directional visuomotor deficie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: LeFauve, Matthew K., Rowe, Cassie J., Crowley-Perry, Mikayla, Wiegand, Jenna L., Shapiro, Arthur G., Connaughton, Victoria P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Journal of Biological Methods 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7884848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33604396
http://dx.doi.org/10.14440/jbm.2021.341
_version_ 1783651498643685376
author LeFauve, Matthew K.
Rowe, Cassie J.
Crowley-Perry, Mikayla
Wiegand, Jenna L.
Shapiro, Arthur G.
Connaughton, Victoria P.
author_facet LeFauve, Matthew K.
Rowe, Cassie J.
Crowley-Perry, Mikayla
Wiegand, Jenna L.
Shapiro, Arthur G.
Connaughton, Victoria P.
author_sort LeFauve, Matthew K.
collection PubMed
description We describe a visual stimulus that can be used with both larval and adult zebrafish (Danio rerio). This protocol is a modification of a standard visual behavior analysis, the optomotor response (OMR). The OMR is often used to determine the spatial response or to detect directional visuomotor deficiencies. An OMR can be generated using a high contrast grated pattern, typically vertical bars. The spatial sensitivity is measured by detection and response to a change in grating bar width and is reported in cycles per degree (CPD). This test has been used extensively with zebrafish larvae and adults to identify visual- and/or motor-based mutations. Historically, when tested in adults, the grated pattern was presented from a vertical perspective, using a rotating cylinder around a holding tank, allowing the grating to be seen solely from the sides and front of the organism. In contrast, OMRs in zebrafish larvae are elicited using a stimulus projected below the fish. This difference in methodology means that two different experimental set-ups are required: one for adults and one for larvae. Our visual stimulus modifies the stimulation format so that a single OMR stimulus, suitable for use with both adults and larvae, is being presented underneath the fish. Analysis of visuomotor responses using this method does not require costly behavioral tracking software and, using a single behavioral paradigm, allows the observer to rapidly determine visual spatial response in both zebrafish larvae and adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7884848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Journal of Biological Methods
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78848482021-02-17 Using a variant of the optomotor response as a visual defect detection assay in zebrafish LeFauve, Matthew K. Rowe, Cassie J. Crowley-Perry, Mikayla Wiegand, Jenna L. Shapiro, Arthur G. Connaughton, Victoria P. J Biol Methods Protocol We describe a visual stimulus that can be used with both larval and adult zebrafish (Danio rerio). This protocol is a modification of a standard visual behavior analysis, the optomotor response (OMR). The OMR is often used to determine the spatial response or to detect directional visuomotor deficiencies. An OMR can be generated using a high contrast grated pattern, typically vertical bars. The spatial sensitivity is measured by detection and response to a change in grating bar width and is reported in cycles per degree (CPD). This test has been used extensively with zebrafish larvae and adults to identify visual- and/or motor-based mutations. Historically, when tested in adults, the grated pattern was presented from a vertical perspective, using a rotating cylinder around a holding tank, allowing the grating to be seen solely from the sides and front of the organism. In contrast, OMRs in zebrafish larvae are elicited using a stimulus projected below the fish. This difference in methodology means that two different experimental set-ups are required: one for adults and one for larvae. Our visual stimulus modifies the stimulation format so that a single OMR stimulus, suitable for use with both adults and larvae, is being presented underneath the fish. Analysis of visuomotor responses using this method does not require costly behavioral tracking software and, using a single behavioral paradigm, allows the observer to rapidly determine visual spatial response in both zebrafish larvae and adults. Journal of Biological Methods 2021-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7884848/ /pubmed/33604396 http://dx.doi.org/10.14440/jbm.2021.341 Text en © 2013-2021 The Journal of Biological Methods, All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
spellingShingle Protocol
LeFauve, Matthew K.
Rowe, Cassie J.
Crowley-Perry, Mikayla
Wiegand, Jenna L.
Shapiro, Arthur G.
Connaughton, Victoria P.
Using a variant of the optomotor response as a visual defect detection assay in zebrafish
title Using a variant of the optomotor response as a visual defect detection assay in zebrafish
title_full Using a variant of the optomotor response as a visual defect detection assay in zebrafish
title_fullStr Using a variant of the optomotor response as a visual defect detection assay in zebrafish
title_full_unstemmed Using a variant of the optomotor response as a visual defect detection assay in zebrafish
title_short Using a variant of the optomotor response as a visual defect detection assay in zebrafish
title_sort using a variant of the optomotor response as a visual defect detection assay in zebrafish
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7884848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33604396
http://dx.doi.org/10.14440/jbm.2021.341
work_keys_str_mv AT lefauvematthewk usingavariantoftheoptomotorresponseasavisualdefectdetectionassayinzebrafish
AT rowecassiej usingavariantoftheoptomotorresponseasavisualdefectdetectionassayinzebrafish
AT crowleyperrymikayla usingavariantoftheoptomotorresponseasavisualdefectdetectionassayinzebrafish
AT wiegandjennal usingavariantoftheoptomotorresponseasavisualdefectdetectionassayinzebrafish
AT shapiroarthurg usingavariantoftheoptomotorresponseasavisualdefectdetectionassayinzebrafish
AT connaughtonvictoriap usingavariantoftheoptomotorresponseasavisualdefectdetectionassayinzebrafish