Cargando…

Aktuelles Vorgehen bei frühem vorzeitigem Blasensprung: neue Definitionen? Ist die CRP-Bestimmung sinnvoll? Sind Alternativen in Sicht?

Around 3% of all pregnancies are complicated by preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) before 37 + 0 weeks of gestation. Since PPROM is likely to be associated with microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (MIAC)—either before or secondary to PPROM—the risk of developing intraamniotic inflam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maul, Holger, Kunze, Mirjam, Berger, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7884967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33612852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00129-021-04750-3
_version_ 1783651525857378304
author Maul, Holger
Kunze, Mirjam
Berger, Richard
author_facet Maul, Holger
Kunze, Mirjam
Berger, Richard
author_sort Maul, Holger
collection PubMed
description Around 3% of all pregnancies are complicated by preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) before 37 + 0 weeks of gestation. Since PPROM is likely to be associated with microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (MIAC)—either before or secondary to PPROM—the risk of developing intraamniotic inflammation (IAI) is high. IAI is associated with short latency to delivery and with adverse short- and long-term outcomes for the newborn, especially in cases of fetal inflammatory response syndrome (FIRS). Prediction of IAI based on maternal parameters is difficult or impossible. The recently established definition of triple I (“infection, inflammation, or both”) is based on the parameter “maternal body temperature”. If this is increased to ≥ 38.0 °C and there is no other reason to explain maternal fever, the finding is suspicious for triple I if at least one other of the following parameters can be found: fetal tachycardia > 160 bpm for at least 10 min, maternal leukocytes > 15,000/µl without administration of corticosteroids, or purulent fluid from the cervical os. Pregnancies suspicious for triple I should be terminated. The confirmation of triple I is only possible by placental histology (histologically confirmed chorioamnionitis, HCA). Confirmation based on amniocentesis (positive Gram stain, low glucose concentration [<14 mg/dl], elevated white blood cell count [>30 cells/mm(3)], positive culture) takes too long and is unreliable. Serial determinations of C‑reactive protein also do not allow reliable diagnosis of IAI. Studies using interleukin 6 measurements from the posterior fornix and/or cervical os are promising methods, the validation of which is awaited.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7884967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78849672021-02-16 Aktuelles Vorgehen bei frühem vorzeitigem Blasensprung: neue Definitionen? Ist die CRP-Bestimmung sinnvoll? Sind Alternativen in Sicht? Maul, Holger Kunze, Mirjam Berger, Richard Gynakologe Leitthema Around 3% of all pregnancies are complicated by preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) before 37 + 0 weeks of gestation. Since PPROM is likely to be associated with microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (MIAC)—either before or secondary to PPROM—the risk of developing intraamniotic inflammation (IAI) is high. IAI is associated with short latency to delivery and with adverse short- and long-term outcomes for the newborn, especially in cases of fetal inflammatory response syndrome (FIRS). Prediction of IAI based on maternal parameters is difficult or impossible. The recently established definition of triple I (“infection, inflammation, or both”) is based on the parameter “maternal body temperature”. If this is increased to ≥ 38.0 °C and there is no other reason to explain maternal fever, the finding is suspicious for triple I if at least one other of the following parameters can be found: fetal tachycardia > 160 bpm for at least 10 min, maternal leukocytes > 15,000/µl without administration of corticosteroids, or purulent fluid from the cervical os. Pregnancies suspicious for triple I should be terminated. The confirmation of triple I is only possible by placental histology (histologically confirmed chorioamnionitis, HCA). Confirmation based on amniocentesis (positive Gram stain, low glucose concentration [<14 mg/dl], elevated white blood cell count [>30 cells/mm(3)], positive culture) takes too long and is unreliable. Serial determinations of C‑reactive protein also do not allow reliable diagnosis of IAI. Studies using interleukin 6 measurements from the posterior fornix and/or cervical os are promising methods, the validation of which is awaited. Springer Medizin 2021-02-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7884967/ /pubmed/33612852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00129-021-04750-3 Text en © Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Leitthema
Maul, Holger
Kunze, Mirjam
Berger, Richard
Aktuelles Vorgehen bei frühem vorzeitigem Blasensprung: neue Definitionen? Ist die CRP-Bestimmung sinnvoll? Sind Alternativen in Sicht?
title Aktuelles Vorgehen bei frühem vorzeitigem Blasensprung: neue Definitionen? Ist die CRP-Bestimmung sinnvoll? Sind Alternativen in Sicht?
title_full Aktuelles Vorgehen bei frühem vorzeitigem Blasensprung: neue Definitionen? Ist die CRP-Bestimmung sinnvoll? Sind Alternativen in Sicht?
title_fullStr Aktuelles Vorgehen bei frühem vorzeitigem Blasensprung: neue Definitionen? Ist die CRP-Bestimmung sinnvoll? Sind Alternativen in Sicht?
title_full_unstemmed Aktuelles Vorgehen bei frühem vorzeitigem Blasensprung: neue Definitionen? Ist die CRP-Bestimmung sinnvoll? Sind Alternativen in Sicht?
title_short Aktuelles Vorgehen bei frühem vorzeitigem Blasensprung: neue Definitionen? Ist die CRP-Bestimmung sinnvoll? Sind Alternativen in Sicht?
title_sort aktuelles vorgehen bei frühem vorzeitigem blasensprung: neue definitionen? ist die crp-bestimmung sinnvoll? sind alternativen in sicht?
topic Leitthema
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7884967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33612852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00129-021-04750-3
work_keys_str_mv AT maulholger aktuellesvorgehenbeifruhemvorzeitigemblasensprungneuedefinitionenistdiecrpbestimmungsinnvollsindalternativeninsicht
AT kunzemirjam aktuellesvorgehenbeifruhemvorzeitigemblasensprungneuedefinitionenistdiecrpbestimmungsinnvollsindalternativeninsicht
AT bergerrichard aktuellesvorgehenbeifruhemvorzeitigemblasensprungneuedefinitionenistdiecrpbestimmungsinnvollsindalternativeninsicht