Cargando…
An observational retrospective analysis of the main metastatic site and corresponding locoregional treatment as a prognostic factor in metastatic gastric cancer
Despite novel drugs, the prognosis for patients with metastatic gastric cancer remains poor. In rare instances, locoregional therapies are used in addition to standard chemotherapy in patients with oligometastatic involvement. This type of approach has not been supported by solid published evidence....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
D.A. Spandidos
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7885158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33717264 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2021.12528 |
_version_ | 1783651554439462912 |
---|---|
author | Giampieri, Riccardo Cantini, Luca Del Prete, Michela Bittoni, Alessandro Giglio, Enrica Mandolesi, Alessandra Maccaroni, Elena Lanese, Andrea Meletani, Tania Baleani, Maria Giuditta Bisonni, Renato Scarpelli, Marina Berardi, Rossana |
author_facet | Giampieri, Riccardo Cantini, Luca Del Prete, Michela Bittoni, Alessandro Giglio, Enrica Mandolesi, Alessandra Maccaroni, Elena Lanese, Andrea Meletani, Tania Baleani, Maria Giuditta Bisonni, Renato Scarpelli, Marina Berardi, Rossana |
author_sort | Giampieri, Riccardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite novel drugs, the prognosis for patients with metastatic gastric cancer remains poor. In rare instances, locoregional therapies are used in addition to standard chemotherapy in patients with oligometastatic involvement. This type of approach has not been supported by solid published evidence. The aim of the present retrospective study was to assess the prognostic impact of factors such as metastatic site, tumour histology and locoregional treatment in patients with metastatic gastric cancer. A total of 184 patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who received at least one line of palliative therapy with doublet or triplet chemotherapy were enrolled in the current analysis. Median overall survival (OS) was 8.32 months (95% CI, 7.02–9.41) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.16 months (95% CI, 3.24–5.08). Lung metastases vs. other sites of metastatic involvement [hazard ratio (HR), 0.27; P=0.0133] and intestinal histology (HR, 0.48; P=0.08) were significantly associated with an improved OS. Improved PFS was also observed (HR, 0.49; P=0.10 and HR, 0.72; P=0.08 for lung metastases and intestinal histology, respectively). Second line chemotherapy and locoregional treatment of metastases (surgery or radiotherapy) were associated with improved OS (HR, 0.52; P<0.0001 and HR, 0.35; P<0.0001, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed an independent prognostic role for OS only for locoregional treatment, second line treatment and intestinal histology. The present results suggested that the presence of lung metastases alone was not a relevant prognostic factor and was influenced by the availability of further lines of treatment or by locoregional treatments. Locoregional treatments in patients with oligometastatic disease should be offered as they allow prolonged survival in patients with otherwise relatively short life expectancy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7885158 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | D.A. Spandidos |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78851582021-03-12 An observational retrospective analysis of the main metastatic site and corresponding locoregional treatment as a prognostic factor in metastatic gastric cancer Giampieri, Riccardo Cantini, Luca Del Prete, Michela Bittoni, Alessandro Giglio, Enrica Mandolesi, Alessandra Maccaroni, Elena Lanese, Andrea Meletani, Tania Baleani, Maria Giuditta Bisonni, Renato Scarpelli, Marina Berardi, Rossana Oncol Lett Articles Despite novel drugs, the prognosis for patients with metastatic gastric cancer remains poor. In rare instances, locoregional therapies are used in addition to standard chemotherapy in patients with oligometastatic involvement. This type of approach has not been supported by solid published evidence. The aim of the present retrospective study was to assess the prognostic impact of factors such as metastatic site, tumour histology and locoregional treatment in patients with metastatic gastric cancer. A total of 184 patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who received at least one line of palliative therapy with doublet or triplet chemotherapy were enrolled in the current analysis. Median overall survival (OS) was 8.32 months (95% CI, 7.02–9.41) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.16 months (95% CI, 3.24–5.08). Lung metastases vs. other sites of metastatic involvement [hazard ratio (HR), 0.27; P=0.0133] and intestinal histology (HR, 0.48; P=0.08) were significantly associated with an improved OS. Improved PFS was also observed (HR, 0.49; P=0.10 and HR, 0.72; P=0.08 for lung metastases and intestinal histology, respectively). Second line chemotherapy and locoregional treatment of metastases (surgery or radiotherapy) were associated with improved OS (HR, 0.52; P<0.0001 and HR, 0.35; P<0.0001, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed an independent prognostic role for OS only for locoregional treatment, second line treatment and intestinal histology. The present results suggested that the presence of lung metastases alone was not a relevant prognostic factor and was influenced by the availability of further lines of treatment or by locoregional treatments. Locoregional treatments in patients with oligometastatic disease should be offered as they allow prolonged survival in patients with otherwise relatively short life expectancy. D.A. Spandidos 2021-04 2021-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7885158/ /pubmed/33717264 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2021.12528 Text en Copyright: © Giampieri et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Articles Giampieri, Riccardo Cantini, Luca Del Prete, Michela Bittoni, Alessandro Giglio, Enrica Mandolesi, Alessandra Maccaroni, Elena Lanese, Andrea Meletani, Tania Baleani, Maria Giuditta Bisonni, Renato Scarpelli, Marina Berardi, Rossana An observational retrospective analysis of the main metastatic site and corresponding locoregional treatment as a prognostic factor in metastatic gastric cancer |
title | An observational retrospective analysis of the main metastatic site and corresponding locoregional treatment as a prognostic factor in metastatic gastric cancer |
title_full | An observational retrospective analysis of the main metastatic site and corresponding locoregional treatment as a prognostic factor in metastatic gastric cancer |
title_fullStr | An observational retrospective analysis of the main metastatic site and corresponding locoregional treatment as a prognostic factor in metastatic gastric cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | An observational retrospective analysis of the main metastatic site and corresponding locoregional treatment as a prognostic factor in metastatic gastric cancer |
title_short | An observational retrospective analysis of the main metastatic site and corresponding locoregional treatment as a prognostic factor in metastatic gastric cancer |
title_sort | observational retrospective analysis of the main metastatic site and corresponding locoregional treatment as a prognostic factor in metastatic gastric cancer |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7885158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33717264 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2021.12528 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giampieririccardo anobservationalretrospectiveanalysisofthemainmetastaticsiteandcorrespondinglocoregionaltreatmentasaprognosticfactorinmetastaticgastriccancer AT cantiniluca anobservationalretrospectiveanalysisofthemainmetastaticsiteandcorrespondinglocoregionaltreatmentasaprognosticfactorinmetastaticgastriccancer AT delpretemichela anobservationalretrospectiveanalysisofthemainmetastaticsiteandcorrespondinglocoregionaltreatmentasaprognosticfactorinmetastaticgastriccancer AT bittonialessandro anobservationalretrospectiveanalysisofthemainmetastaticsiteandcorrespondinglocoregionaltreatmentasaprognosticfactorinmetastaticgastriccancer AT giglioenrica anobservationalretrospectiveanalysisofthemainmetastaticsiteandcorrespondinglocoregionaltreatmentasaprognosticfactorinmetastaticgastriccancer AT mandolesialessandra anobservationalretrospectiveanalysisofthemainmetastaticsiteandcorrespondinglocoregionaltreatmentasaprognosticfactorinmetastaticgastriccancer AT maccaronielena anobservationalretrospectiveanalysisofthemainmetastaticsiteandcorrespondinglocoregionaltreatmentasaprognosticfactorinmetastaticgastriccancer AT laneseandrea anobservationalretrospectiveanalysisofthemainmetastaticsiteandcorrespondinglocoregionaltreatmentasaprognosticfactorinmetastaticgastriccancer AT meletanitania anobservationalretrospectiveanalysisofthemainmetastaticsiteandcorrespondinglocoregionaltreatmentasaprognosticfactorinmetastaticgastriccancer AT baleanimariagiuditta anobservationalretrospectiveanalysisofthemainmetastaticsiteandcorrespondinglocoregionaltreatmentasaprognosticfactorinmetastaticgastriccancer AT bisonnirenato anobservationalretrospectiveanalysisofthemainmetastaticsiteandcorrespondinglocoregionaltreatmentasaprognosticfactorinmetastaticgastriccancer AT scarpellimarina anobservationalretrospectiveanalysisofthemainmetastaticsiteandcorrespondinglocoregionaltreatmentasaprognosticfactorinmetastaticgastriccancer AT berardirossana anobservationalretrospectiveanalysisofthemainmetastaticsiteandcorrespondinglocoregionaltreatmentasaprognosticfactorinmetastaticgastriccancer AT giampieririccardo observationalretrospectiveanalysisofthemainmetastaticsiteandcorrespondinglocoregionaltreatmentasaprognosticfactorinmetastaticgastriccancer AT cantiniluca observationalretrospectiveanalysisofthemainmetastaticsiteandcorrespondinglocoregionaltreatmentasaprognosticfactorinmetastaticgastriccancer AT delpretemichela observationalretrospectiveanalysisofthemainmetastaticsiteandcorrespondinglocoregionaltreatmentasaprognosticfactorinmetastaticgastriccancer AT bittonialessandro observationalretrospectiveanalysisofthemainmetastaticsiteandcorrespondinglocoregionaltreatmentasaprognosticfactorinmetastaticgastriccancer AT giglioenrica observationalretrospectiveanalysisofthemainmetastaticsiteandcorrespondinglocoregionaltreatmentasaprognosticfactorinmetastaticgastriccancer AT mandolesialessandra observationalretrospectiveanalysisofthemainmetastaticsiteandcorrespondinglocoregionaltreatmentasaprognosticfactorinmetastaticgastriccancer AT maccaronielena observationalretrospectiveanalysisofthemainmetastaticsiteandcorrespondinglocoregionaltreatmentasaprognosticfactorinmetastaticgastriccancer AT laneseandrea observationalretrospectiveanalysisofthemainmetastaticsiteandcorrespondinglocoregionaltreatmentasaprognosticfactorinmetastaticgastriccancer AT meletanitania observationalretrospectiveanalysisofthemainmetastaticsiteandcorrespondinglocoregionaltreatmentasaprognosticfactorinmetastaticgastriccancer AT baleanimariagiuditta observationalretrospectiveanalysisofthemainmetastaticsiteandcorrespondinglocoregionaltreatmentasaprognosticfactorinmetastaticgastriccancer AT bisonnirenato observationalretrospectiveanalysisofthemainmetastaticsiteandcorrespondinglocoregionaltreatmentasaprognosticfactorinmetastaticgastriccancer AT scarpellimarina observationalretrospectiveanalysisofthemainmetastaticsiteandcorrespondinglocoregionaltreatmentasaprognosticfactorinmetastaticgastriccancer AT berardirossana observationalretrospectiveanalysisofthemainmetastaticsiteandcorrespondinglocoregionaltreatmentasaprognosticfactorinmetastaticgastriccancer |