Cargando…

Impact of treating iron deficiency, diagnosed according to hepcidin quantification, on outcomes after a prolonged ICU stay compared to standard care: a multicenter, randomized, single-blinded trial

BACKGROUND: Anemia is a significant problem in patients on ICU. Its commonest cause, iron deficiency (ID), is difficult to diagnose in the context of inflammation. Hepcidin is a new marker of ID. We aimed to assess whether hepcidin levels would accurately guide treatment of ID in critically ill anem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lasocki, Sigismond, Asfar, Pierre, Jaber, Samir, Ferrandiere, Martine, Kerforne, Thomas, Asehnoune, Karim, Montravers, Philippe, Seguin, Philippe, Peoc’h, Katell, Gergaud, Soizic, Nagot, Nicolas, Lefebvre, Thibaud, Lehmann, Sylvain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7885380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33588893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03430-3
_version_ 1783651592298299392
author Lasocki, Sigismond
Asfar, Pierre
Jaber, Samir
Ferrandiere, Martine
Kerforne, Thomas
Asehnoune, Karim
Montravers, Philippe
Seguin, Philippe
Peoc’h, Katell
Gergaud, Soizic
Nagot, Nicolas
Lefebvre, Thibaud
Lehmann, Sylvain
author_facet Lasocki, Sigismond
Asfar, Pierre
Jaber, Samir
Ferrandiere, Martine
Kerforne, Thomas
Asehnoune, Karim
Montravers, Philippe
Seguin, Philippe
Peoc’h, Katell
Gergaud, Soizic
Nagot, Nicolas
Lefebvre, Thibaud
Lehmann, Sylvain
author_sort Lasocki, Sigismond
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anemia is a significant problem in patients on ICU. Its commonest cause, iron deficiency (ID), is difficult to diagnose in the context of inflammation. Hepcidin is a new marker of ID. We aimed to assess whether hepcidin levels would accurately guide treatment of ID in critically ill anemic patients after a prolonged ICU stay and affect the post-ICU outcomes. METHODS: In a controlled, single-blinded, multicenter study, anemic (WHO definition) critically ill patients with an ICU stay ≥ 5 days were randomized when discharge was expected to either intervention by hepcidin treatment protocol or control. In the intervention arm, patients were treated with intravenous iron (1 g of ferric carboxymaltose) when hepcidin was < 20 μg/l and with intravenous iron and erythropoietin for 20 ≤ hepcidin < 41 μg/l. Control patients were treated according to standard care (hepcidin quantification remained blinded). Primary endpoint was the number of days spent in hospital 90 days after ICU discharge (post-ICU LOS). Secondary endpoints were day 15 anemia, day 30 fatigue, day 90 mortality and 1-year survival. RESULTS: Of 405 randomized patients, 399 were analyzed (201 in intervention and 198 in control arm). A total of 220 patients (55%) had ID at discharge (i.e., a hepcidin < 41 μg/l). Primary endpoint was not different (medians (IQR) post-ICU LOS 33(13;90) vs. 33(11;90) days for intervention and control, respectively, median difference − 1(− 3;1) days, p = 0.78). D90 mortality was significantly lower in intervention arm (16(8%) vs 33(16.6%) deaths, absolute risk difference − 8.7 (− 15.1 to − 2.3)%, p = 0.008, OR 95% IC, 0.46, 0.22–0.94, p = 0.035), and one-year survival was improved (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Treatment of ID diagnosed according to hepcidin levels did not reduce the post-ICU LOS, but was associated with a significant reduction in D90 mortality and with improved 1-year survival in critically ill patients about to be discharged after a prolonged stay. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrial.gov NCT02276690 (October 28, 2014; retrospectively registered)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7885380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78853802021-02-17 Impact of treating iron deficiency, diagnosed according to hepcidin quantification, on outcomes after a prolonged ICU stay compared to standard care: a multicenter, randomized, single-blinded trial Lasocki, Sigismond Asfar, Pierre Jaber, Samir Ferrandiere, Martine Kerforne, Thomas Asehnoune, Karim Montravers, Philippe Seguin, Philippe Peoc’h, Katell Gergaud, Soizic Nagot, Nicolas Lefebvre, Thibaud Lehmann, Sylvain Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Anemia is a significant problem in patients on ICU. Its commonest cause, iron deficiency (ID), is difficult to diagnose in the context of inflammation. Hepcidin is a new marker of ID. We aimed to assess whether hepcidin levels would accurately guide treatment of ID in critically ill anemic patients after a prolonged ICU stay and affect the post-ICU outcomes. METHODS: In a controlled, single-blinded, multicenter study, anemic (WHO definition) critically ill patients with an ICU stay ≥ 5 days were randomized when discharge was expected to either intervention by hepcidin treatment protocol or control. In the intervention arm, patients were treated with intravenous iron (1 g of ferric carboxymaltose) when hepcidin was < 20 μg/l and with intravenous iron and erythropoietin for 20 ≤ hepcidin < 41 μg/l. Control patients were treated according to standard care (hepcidin quantification remained blinded). Primary endpoint was the number of days spent in hospital 90 days after ICU discharge (post-ICU LOS). Secondary endpoints were day 15 anemia, day 30 fatigue, day 90 mortality and 1-year survival. RESULTS: Of 405 randomized patients, 399 were analyzed (201 in intervention and 198 in control arm). A total of 220 patients (55%) had ID at discharge (i.e., a hepcidin < 41 μg/l). Primary endpoint was not different (medians (IQR) post-ICU LOS 33(13;90) vs. 33(11;90) days for intervention and control, respectively, median difference − 1(− 3;1) days, p = 0.78). D90 mortality was significantly lower in intervention arm (16(8%) vs 33(16.6%) deaths, absolute risk difference − 8.7 (− 15.1 to − 2.3)%, p = 0.008, OR 95% IC, 0.46, 0.22–0.94, p = 0.035), and one-year survival was improved (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Treatment of ID diagnosed according to hepcidin levels did not reduce the post-ICU LOS, but was associated with a significant reduction in D90 mortality and with improved 1-year survival in critically ill patients about to be discharged after a prolonged stay. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrial.gov NCT02276690 (October 28, 2014; retrospectively registered) BioMed Central 2021-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7885380/ /pubmed/33588893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03430-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lasocki, Sigismond
Asfar, Pierre
Jaber, Samir
Ferrandiere, Martine
Kerforne, Thomas
Asehnoune, Karim
Montravers, Philippe
Seguin, Philippe
Peoc’h, Katell
Gergaud, Soizic
Nagot, Nicolas
Lefebvre, Thibaud
Lehmann, Sylvain
Impact of treating iron deficiency, diagnosed according to hepcidin quantification, on outcomes after a prolonged ICU stay compared to standard care: a multicenter, randomized, single-blinded trial
title Impact of treating iron deficiency, diagnosed according to hepcidin quantification, on outcomes after a prolonged ICU stay compared to standard care: a multicenter, randomized, single-blinded trial
title_full Impact of treating iron deficiency, diagnosed according to hepcidin quantification, on outcomes after a prolonged ICU stay compared to standard care: a multicenter, randomized, single-blinded trial
title_fullStr Impact of treating iron deficiency, diagnosed according to hepcidin quantification, on outcomes after a prolonged ICU stay compared to standard care: a multicenter, randomized, single-blinded trial
title_full_unstemmed Impact of treating iron deficiency, diagnosed according to hepcidin quantification, on outcomes after a prolonged ICU stay compared to standard care: a multicenter, randomized, single-blinded trial
title_short Impact of treating iron deficiency, diagnosed according to hepcidin quantification, on outcomes after a prolonged ICU stay compared to standard care: a multicenter, randomized, single-blinded trial
title_sort impact of treating iron deficiency, diagnosed according to hepcidin quantification, on outcomes after a prolonged icu stay compared to standard care: a multicenter, randomized, single-blinded trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7885380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33588893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03430-3
work_keys_str_mv AT lasockisigismond impactoftreatingirondeficiencydiagnosedaccordingtohepcidinquantificationonoutcomesafteraprolongedicustaycomparedtostandardcareamulticenterrandomizedsingleblindedtrial
AT asfarpierre impactoftreatingirondeficiencydiagnosedaccordingtohepcidinquantificationonoutcomesafteraprolongedicustaycomparedtostandardcareamulticenterrandomizedsingleblindedtrial
AT jabersamir impactoftreatingirondeficiencydiagnosedaccordingtohepcidinquantificationonoutcomesafteraprolongedicustaycomparedtostandardcareamulticenterrandomizedsingleblindedtrial
AT ferrandieremartine impactoftreatingirondeficiencydiagnosedaccordingtohepcidinquantificationonoutcomesafteraprolongedicustaycomparedtostandardcareamulticenterrandomizedsingleblindedtrial
AT kerfornethomas impactoftreatingirondeficiencydiagnosedaccordingtohepcidinquantificationonoutcomesafteraprolongedicustaycomparedtostandardcareamulticenterrandomizedsingleblindedtrial
AT asehnounekarim impactoftreatingirondeficiencydiagnosedaccordingtohepcidinquantificationonoutcomesafteraprolongedicustaycomparedtostandardcareamulticenterrandomizedsingleblindedtrial
AT montraversphilippe impactoftreatingirondeficiencydiagnosedaccordingtohepcidinquantificationonoutcomesafteraprolongedicustaycomparedtostandardcareamulticenterrandomizedsingleblindedtrial
AT seguinphilippe impactoftreatingirondeficiencydiagnosedaccordingtohepcidinquantificationonoutcomesafteraprolongedicustaycomparedtostandardcareamulticenterrandomizedsingleblindedtrial
AT peochkatell impactoftreatingirondeficiencydiagnosedaccordingtohepcidinquantificationonoutcomesafteraprolongedicustaycomparedtostandardcareamulticenterrandomizedsingleblindedtrial
AT gergaudsoizic impactoftreatingirondeficiencydiagnosedaccordingtohepcidinquantificationonoutcomesafteraprolongedicustaycomparedtostandardcareamulticenterrandomizedsingleblindedtrial
AT nagotnicolas impactoftreatingirondeficiencydiagnosedaccordingtohepcidinquantificationonoutcomesafteraprolongedicustaycomparedtostandardcareamulticenterrandomizedsingleblindedtrial
AT lefebvrethibaud impactoftreatingirondeficiencydiagnosedaccordingtohepcidinquantificationonoutcomesafteraprolongedicustaycomparedtostandardcareamulticenterrandomizedsingleblindedtrial
AT lehmannsylvain impactoftreatingirondeficiencydiagnosedaccordingtohepcidinquantificationonoutcomesafteraprolongedicustaycomparedtostandardcareamulticenterrandomizedsingleblindedtrial
AT impactoftreatingirondeficiencydiagnosedaccordingtohepcidinquantificationonoutcomesafteraprolongedicustaycomparedtostandardcareamulticenterrandomizedsingleblindedtrial