Cargando…

Systematic literature review of machine learning methods used in the analysis of real-world data for patient-provider decision making

BACKGROUND: Machine learning is a broad term encompassing a number of methods that allow the investigator to learn from the data. These methods may permit large real-world databases to be more rapidly translated to applications to inform patient-provider decision making. METHODS: This systematic lit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brnabic, Alan, Hess, Lisa M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7885605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33588830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01403-2
_version_ 1783651639924621312
author Brnabic, Alan
Hess, Lisa M.
author_facet Brnabic, Alan
Hess, Lisa M.
author_sort Brnabic, Alan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Machine learning is a broad term encompassing a number of methods that allow the investigator to learn from the data. These methods may permit large real-world databases to be more rapidly translated to applications to inform patient-provider decision making. METHODS: This systematic literature review was conducted to identify published observational research of employed machine learning to inform decision making at the patient-provider level. The search strategy was implemented and studies meeting eligibility criteria were evaluated by two independent reviewers. Relevant data related to study design, statistical methods and strengths and limitations were identified; study quality was assessed using a modified version of the Luo checklist. RESULTS: A total of 34 publications from January 2014 to September 2020 were identified and evaluated for this review. There were diverse methods, statistical packages and approaches used across identified studies. The most common methods included decision tree and random forest approaches. Most studies applied internal validation but only two conducted external validation. Most studies utilized one algorithm, and only eight studies applied multiple machine learning algorithms to the data. Seven items on the Luo checklist failed to be met by more than 50% of published studies. CONCLUSIONS: A wide variety of approaches, algorithms, statistical software, and validation strategies were employed in the application of machine learning methods to inform patient-provider decision making. There is a need to ensure that multiple machine learning approaches are used, the model selection strategy is clearly defined, and both internal and external validation are necessary to be sure that decisions for patient care are being made with the highest quality evidence. Future work should routinely employ ensemble methods incorporating multiple machine learning algorithms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7885605
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78856052021-02-22 Systematic literature review of machine learning methods used in the analysis of real-world data for patient-provider decision making Brnabic, Alan Hess, Lisa M. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Machine learning is a broad term encompassing a number of methods that allow the investigator to learn from the data. These methods may permit large real-world databases to be more rapidly translated to applications to inform patient-provider decision making. METHODS: This systematic literature review was conducted to identify published observational research of employed machine learning to inform decision making at the patient-provider level. The search strategy was implemented and studies meeting eligibility criteria were evaluated by two independent reviewers. Relevant data related to study design, statistical methods and strengths and limitations were identified; study quality was assessed using a modified version of the Luo checklist. RESULTS: A total of 34 publications from January 2014 to September 2020 were identified and evaluated for this review. There were diverse methods, statistical packages and approaches used across identified studies. The most common methods included decision tree and random forest approaches. Most studies applied internal validation but only two conducted external validation. Most studies utilized one algorithm, and only eight studies applied multiple machine learning algorithms to the data. Seven items on the Luo checklist failed to be met by more than 50% of published studies. CONCLUSIONS: A wide variety of approaches, algorithms, statistical software, and validation strategies were employed in the application of machine learning methods to inform patient-provider decision making. There is a need to ensure that multiple machine learning approaches are used, the model selection strategy is clearly defined, and both internal and external validation are necessary to be sure that decisions for patient care are being made with the highest quality evidence. Future work should routinely employ ensemble methods incorporating multiple machine learning algorithms. BioMed Central 2021-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7885605/ /pubmed/33588830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01403-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brnabic, Alan
Hess, Lisa M.
Systematic literature review of machine learning methods used in the analysis of real-world data for patient-provider decision making
title Systematic literature review of machine learning methods used in the analysis of real-world data for patient-provider decision making
title_full Systematic literature review of machine learning methods used in the analysis of real-world data for patient-provider decision making
title_fullStr Systematic literature review of machine learning methods used in the analysis of real-world data for patient-provider decision making
title_full_unstemmed Systematic literature review of machine learning methods used in the analysis of real-world data for patient-provider decision making
title_short Systematic literature review of machine learning methods used in the analysis of real-world data for patient-provider decision making
title_sort systematic literature review of machine learning methods used in the analysis of real-world data for patient-provider decision making
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7885605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33588830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01403-2
work_keys_str_mv AT brnabicalan systematicliteraturereviewofmachinelearningmethodsusedintheanalysisofrealworlddataforpatientproviderdecisionmaking
AT hesslisam systematicliteraturereviewofmachinelearningmethodsusedintheanalysisofrealworlddataforpatientproviderdecisionmaking