Cargando…
Estimating the Population Health Impact of Recently Introduced Modified Risk Tobacco Products: A Comparison of Different Approaches
INTRODUCTION: Various approaches have been used to estimate the population health impact of introducing a Modified Risk Tobacco Product (MRTP). AIMS AND METHODS: We aimed to compare and contrast aspects of models considering effects on mortality that were known to experts attending a meeting on mode...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7885777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32496514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa102 |
_version_ | 1783651674153287680 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Peter N Abrams, David Bachand, Annette Baker, Gizelle Black, Ryan Camacho, Oscar Curtin, Geoffrey Djurdjevic, Smilja Hill, Andrew Mendez, David Muhammad-Kah, Raheema S Murillo, Jose Luis Niaura, Raymond Pithawalla, Yezdi B Poland, Bill Sulsky, Sandra Wei, Lai Weitkunat, Rolf |
author_facet | Lee, Peter N Abrams, David Bachand, Annette Baker, Gizelle Black, Ryan Camacho, Oscar Curtin, Geoffrey Djurdjevic, Smilja Hill, Andrew Mendez, David Muhammad-Kah, Raheema S Murillo, Jose Luis Niaura, Raymond Pithawalla, Yezdi B Poland, Bill Sulsky, Sandra Wei, Lai Weitkunat, Rolf |
author_sort | Lee, Peter N |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Various approaches have been used to estimate the population health impact of introducing a Modified Risk Tobacco Product (MRTP). AIMS AND METHODS: We aimed to compare and contrast aspects of models considering effects on mortality that were known to experts attending a meeting on models in 2018. RESULTS: Thirteen models are described, some focussing on e-cigarettes, others more general. Most models are cohort-based, comparing results with or without MRTP introduction. They typically start with a population with known smoking habits and then use transition probabilities either to update smoking habits in the “null scenario” or joint smoking and MRTP habits in an “alternative scenario”. The models vary in the tobacco groups and transition probabilities considered. Based on aspects of the tobacco history developed, the models compare mortality risks, and sometimes life-years lost and health costs, between scenarios. Estimating effects on population health depends on frequency of use of the MRTP and smoking, and the extent to which the products expose users to harmful constituents. Strengths and weaknesses of the approaches are summarized. CONCLUSIONS: Despite methodological differences, most modellers have assumed the increase in risk of mortality from MRTP use, relative to that from cigarette smoking, to be very low and have concluded that MRTP introduction is likely to have a beneficial impact. Further model development, supplemented by preliminary results from well-designed epidemiological studies, should enable more precise prediction of the anticipated effects of MRTP introduction. IMPLICATIONS: There is a need to estimate the population health impact of introducing modified risk nicotine-containing products for smokers unwilling or unable to quit. This paper reviews a variety of modeling methodologies proposed to do this, and discusses the implications of the different approaches. It should assist modelers in refining and improving their models, and help toward providing authorities with more reliable estimates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7885777 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78857772021-02-19 Estimating the Population Health Impact of Recently Introduced Modified Risk Tobacco Products: A Comparison of Different Approaches Lee, Peter N Abrams, David Bachand, Annette Baker, Gizelle Black, Ryan Camacho, Oscar Curtin, Geoffrey Djurdjevic, Smilja Hill, Andrew Mendez, David Muhammad-Kah, Raheema S Murillo, Jose Luis Niaura, Raymond Pithawalla, Yezdi B Poland, Bill Sulsky, Sandra Wei, Lai Weitkunat, Rolf Nicotine Tob Res Reviews INTRODUCTION: Various approaches have been used to estimate the population health impact of introducing a Modified Risk Tobacco Product (MRTP). AIMS AND METHODS: We aimed to compare and contrast aspects of models considering effects on mortality that were known to experts attending a meeting on models in 2018. RESULTS: Thirteen models are described, some focussing on e-cigarettes, others more general. Most models are cohort-based, comparing results with or without MRTP introduction. They typically start with a population with known smoking habits and then use transition probabilities either to update smoking habits in the “null scenario” or joint smoking and MRTP habits in an “alternative scenario”. The models vary in the tobacco groups and transition probabilities considered. Based on aspects of the tobacco history developed, the models compare mortality risks, and sometimes life-years lost and health costs, between scenarios. Estimating effects on population health depends on frequency of use of the MRTP and smoking, and the extent to which the products expose users to harmful constituents. Strengths and weaknesses of the approaches are summarized. CONCLUSIONS: Despite methodological differences, most modellers have assumed the increase in risk of mortality from MRTP use, relative to that from cigarette smoking, to be very low and have concluded that MRTP introduction is likely to have a beneficial impact. Further model development, supplemented by preliminary results from well-designed epidemiological studies, should enable more precise prediction of the anticipated effects of MRTP introduction. IMPLICATIONS: There is a need to estimate the population health impact of introducing modified risk nicotine-containing products for smokers unwilling or unable to quit. This paper reviews a variety of modeling methodologies proposed to do this, and discusses the implications of the different approaches. It should assist modelers in refining and improving their models, and help toward providing authorities with more reliable estimates. Oxford University Press 2020-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7885777/ /pubmed/32496514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa102 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Lee, Peter N Abrams, David Bachand, Annette Baker, Gizelle Black, Ryan Camacho, Oscar Curtin, Geoffrey Djurdjevic, Smilja Hill, Andrew Mendez, David Muhammad-Kah, Raheema S Murillo, Jose Luis Niaura, Raymond Pithawalla, Yezdi B Poland, Bill Sulsky, Sandra Wei, Lai Weitkunat, Rolf Estimating the Population Health Impact of Recently Introduced Modified Risk Tobacco Products: A Comparison of Different Approaches |
title | Estimating the Population Health Impact of Recently Introduced Modified Risk Tobacco Products: A Comparison of Different Approaches |
title_full | Estimating the Population Health Impact of Recently Introduced Modified Risk Tobacco Products: A Comparison of Different Approaches |
title_fullStr | Estimating the Population Health Impact of Recently Introduced Modified Risk Tobacco Products: A Comparison of Different Approaches |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimating the Population Health Impact of Recently Introduced Modified Risk Tobacco Products: A Comparison of Different Approaches |
title_short | Estimating the Population Health Impact of Recently Introduced Modified Risk Tobacco Products: A Comparison of Different Approaches |
title_sort | estimating the population health impact of recently introduced modified risk tobacco products: a comparison of different approaches |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7885777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32496514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa102 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leepetern estimatingthepopulationhealthimpactofrecentlyintroducedmodifiedrisktobaccoproductsacomparisonofdifferentapproaches AT abramsdavid estimatingthepopulationhealthimpactofrecentlyintroducedmodifiedrisktobaccoproductsacomparisonofdifferentapproaches AT bachandannette estimatingthepopulationhealthimpactofrecentlyintroducedmodifiedrisktobaccoproductsacomparisonofdifferentapproaches AT bakergizelle estimatingthepopulationhealthimpactofrecentlyintroducedmodifiedrisktobaccoproductsacomparisonofdifferentapproaches AT blackryan estimatingthepopulationhealthimpactofrecentlyintroducedmodifiedrisktobaccoproductsacomparisonofdifferentapproaches AT camachooscar estimatingthepopulationhealthimpactofrecentlyintroducedmodifiedrisktobaccoproductsacomparisonofdifferentapproaches AT curtingeoffrey estimatingthepopulationhealthimpactofrecentlyintroducedmodifiedrisktobaccoproductsacomparisonofdifferentapproaches AT djurdjevicsmilja estimatingthepopulationhealthimpactofrecentlyintroducedmodifiedrisktobaccoproductsacomparisonofdifferentapproaches AT hillandrew estimatingthepopulationhealthimpactofrecentlyintroducedmodifiedrisktobaccoproductsacomparisonofdifferentapproaches AT mendezdavid estimatingthepopulationhealthimpactofrecentlyintroducedmodifiedrisktobaccoproductsacomparisonofdifferentapproaches AT muhammadkahraheemas estimatingthepopulationhealthimpactofrecentlyintroducedmodifiedrisktobaccoproductsacomparisonofdifferentapproaches AT murillojoseluis estimatingthepopulationhealthimpactofrecentlyintroducedmodifiedrisktobaccoproductsacomparisonofdifferentapproaches AT niauraraymond estimatingthepopulationhealthimpactofrecentlyintroducedmodifiedrisktobaccoproductsacomparisonofdifferentapproaches AT pithawallayezdib estimatingthepopulationhealthimpactofrecentlyintroducedmodifiedrisktobaccoproductsacomparisonofdifferentapproaches AT polandbill estimatingthepopulationhealthimpactofrecentlyintroducedmodifiedrisktobaccoproductsacomparisonofdifferentapproaches AT sulskysandra estimatingthepopulationhealthimpactofrecentlyintroducedmodifiedrisktobaccoproductsacomparisonofdifferentapproaches AT weilai estimatingthepopulationhealthimpactofrecentlyintroducedmodifiedrisktobaccoproductsacomparisonofdifferentapproaches AT weitkunatrolf estimatingthepopulationhealthimpactofrecentlyintroducedmodifiedrisktobaccoproductsacomparisonofdifferentapproaches |