Cargando…

Comparison of diagnostic performance between convolutional neural networks and human endoscopists for diagnosis of colorectal polyp: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Prospective randomized trials and observational studies have revealed that early detection, classification, and removal of neoplastic colorectal polyp (CP) significantly improve the prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC). The current effectiveness of the diagnostic performance of colonoscopy remains...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Yixin, Ding, Wei, Wang, Yibo, Tan, Yulin, Xi, Cheng, Ye, Nianyuan, Wu, Dapeng, Xu, Xuezhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7886136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33592048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246892
_version_ 1783651735409000448
author Xu, Yixin
Ding, Wei
Wang, Yibo
Tan, Yulin
Xi, Cheng
Ye, Nianyuan
Wu, Dapeng
Xu, Xuezhong
author_facet Xu, Yixin
Ding, Wei
Wang, Yibo
Tan, Yulin
Xi, Cheng
Ye, Nianyuan
Wu, Dapeng
Xu, Xuezhong
author_sort Xu, Yixin
collection PubMed
description Prospective randomized trials and observational studies have revealed that early detection, classification, and removal of neoplastic colorectal polyp (CP) significantly improve the prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC). The current effectiveness of the diagnostic performance of colonoscopy remains unsatisfactory with unstable accuracy. The convolutional neural networks (CNN) system based on artificial intelligence (AI) technology has demonstrated its potential to help endoscopists in increasing diagnostic accuracy. Nonetheless, several limitations of the CNN system and controversies exist on whether it provides a better diagnostic performance compared to human endoscopists. Therefore, this study sought to address this issue. Online databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE) were used to search for studies conducted up to April 2020. Besides, the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy scale-2 (QUADAS-2) was used to evaluate the quality of the enrolled studies. Moreover, publication bias was determined using the Deeks’ funnel plot. In total, 13 studies were enrolled for this meta-analysis (ranged between 2016 and 2020). Consequently, the CNN system had a satisfactory diagnostic performance in the field of CP detection (sensitivity: 0.848 [95% CI: 0.692–0.932]; specificity: 0.965 [95% CI: 0.946–0.977]; and AUC: 0.98 [95% CI: 0.96–0.99]) and CP classification (sensitivity: 0.943 [95% CI: 0.927–0.955]; specificity: 0.894 [95% CI: 0.631–0.977]; and AUC: 0.95 [95% CI: 0.93–0.97]). In comparison with human endoscopists, the CNN system was comparable to the expert but significantly better than the non-expert in the field of CP classification (CNN vs. expert: RDOR: 1.03, P = 0.9654; non-expert vs. expert: RDOR: 0.29, P = 0.0559; non-expert vs. CNN: 0.18, P = 0.0342). Therefore, the CNN system exhibited a satisfactory diagnostic performance for CP and could be used as a potential clinical diagnostic tool during colonoscopy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7886136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78861362021-02-23 Comparison of diagnostic performance between convolutional neural networks and human endoscopists for diagnosis of colorectal polyp: A systematic review and meta-analysis Xu, Yixin Ding, Wei Wang, Yibo Tan, Yulin Xi, Cheng Ye, Nianyuan Wu, Dapeng Xu, Xuezhong PLoS One Research Article Prospective randomized trials and observational studies have revealed that early detection, classification, and removal of neoplastic colorectal polyp (CP) significantly improve the prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC). The current effectiveness of the diagnostic performance of colonoscopy remains unsatisfactory with unstable accuracy. The convolutional neural networks (CNN) system based on artificial intelligence (AI) technology has demonstrated its potential to help endoscopists in increasing diagnostic accuracy. Nonetheless, several limitations of the CNN system and controversies exist on whether it provides a better diagnostic performance compared to human endoscopists. Therefore, this study sought to address this issue. Online databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE) were used to search for studies conducted up to April 2020. Besides, the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy scale-2 (QUADAS-2) was used to evaluate the quality of the enrolled studies. Moreover, publication bias was determined using the Deeks’ funnel plot. In total, 13 studies were enrolled for this meta-analysis (ranged between 2016 and 2020). Consequently, the CNN system had a satisfactory diagnostic performance in the field of CP detection (sensitivity: 0.848 [95% CI: 0.692–0.932]; specificity: 0.965 [95% CI: 0.946–0.977]; and AUC: 0.98 [95% CI: 0.96–0.99]) and CP classification (sensitivity: 0.943 [95% CI: 0.927–0.955]; specificity: 0.894 [95% CI: 0.631–0.977]; and AUC: 0.95 [95% CI: 0.93–0.97]). In comparison with human endoscopists, the CNN system was comparable to the expert but significantly better than the non-expert in the field of CP classification (CNN vs. expert: RDOR: 1.03, P = 0.9654; non-expert vs. expert: RDOR: 0.29, P = 0.0559; non-expert vs. CNN: 0.18, P = 0.0342). Therefore, the CNN system exhibited a satisfactory diagnostic performance for CP and could be used as a potential clinical diagnostic tool during colonoscopy. Public Library of Science 2021-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7886136/ /pubmed/33592048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246892 Text en © 2021 Xu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xu, Yixin
Ding, Wei
Wang, Yibo
Tan, Yulin
Xi, Cheng
Ye, Nianyuan
Wu, Dapeng
Xu, Xuezhong
Comparison of diagnostic performance between convolutional neural networks and human endoscopists for diagnosis of colorectal polyp: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Comparison of diagnostic performance between convolutional neural networks and human endoscopists for diagnosis of colorectal polyp: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of diagnostic performance between convolutional neural networks and human endoscopists for diagnosis of colorectal polyp: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of diagnostic performance between convolutional neural networks and human endoscopists for diagnosis of colorectal polyp: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of diagnostic performance between convolutional neural networks and human endoscopists for diagnosis of colorectal polyp: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of diagnostic performance between convolutional neural networks and human endoscopists for diagnosis of colorectal polyp: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of diagnostic performance between convolutional neural networks and human endoscopists for diagnosis of colorectal polyp: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7886136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33592048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246892
work_keys_str_mv AT xuyixin comparisonofdiagnosticperformancebetweenconvolutionalneuralnetworksandhumanendoscopistsfordiagnosisofcolorectalpolypasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dingwei comparisonofdiagnosticperformancebetweenconvolutionalneuralnetworksandhumanendoscopistsfordiagnosisofcolorectalpolypasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangyibo comparisonofdiagnosticperformancebetweenconvolutionalneuralnetworksandhumanendoscopistsfordiagnosisofcolorectalpolypasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tanyulin comparisonofdiagnosticperformancebetweenconvolutionalneuralnetworksandhumanendoscopistsfordiagnosisofcolorectalpolypasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xicheng comparisonofdiagnosticperformancebetweenconvolutionalneuralnetworksandhumanendoscopistsfordiagnosisofcolorectalpolypasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yenianyuan comparisonofdiagnosticperformancebetweenconvolutionalneuralnetworksandhumanendoscopistsfordiagnosisofcolorectalpolypasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wudapeng comparisonofdiagnosticperformancebetweenconvolutionalneuralnetworksandhumanendoscopistsfordiagnosisofcolorectalpolypasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuxuezhong comparisonofdiagnosticperformancebetweenconvolutionalneuralnetworksandhumanendoscopistsfordiagnosisofcolorectalpolypasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis