Cargando…
Comparison of diagnostic performance between convolutional neural networks and human endoscopists for diagnosis of colorectal polyp: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Prospective randomized trials and observational studies have revealed that early detection, classification, and removal of neoplastic colorectal polyp (CP) significantly improve the prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC). The current effectiveness of the diagnostic performance of colonoscopy remains...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7886136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33592048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246892 |
_version_ | 1783651735409000448 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Yixin Ding, Wei Wang, Yibo Tan, Yulin Xi, Cheng Ye, Nianyuan Wu, Dapeng Xu, Xuezhong |
author_facet | Xu, Yixin Ding, Wei Wang, Yibo Tan, Yulin Xi, Cheng Ye, Nianyuan Wu, Dapeng Xu, Xuezhong |
author_sort | Xu, Yixin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prospective randomized trials and observational studies have revealed that early detection, classification, and removal of neoplastic colorectal polyp (CP) significantly improve the prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC). The current effectiveness of the diagnostic performance of colonoscopy remains unsatisfactory with unstable accuracy. The convolutional neural networks (CNN) system based on artificial intelligence (AI) technology has demonstrated its potential to help endoscopists in increasing diagnostic accuracy. Nonetheless, several limitations of the CNN system and controversies exist on whether it provides a better diagnostic performance compared to human endoscopists. Therefore, this study sought to address this issue. Online databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE) were used to search for studies conducted up to April 2020. Besides, the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy scale-2 (QUADAS-2) was used to evaluate the quality of the enrolled studies. Moreover, publication bias was determined using the Deeks’ funnel plot. In total, 13 studies were enrolled for this meta-analysis (ranged between 2016 and 2020). Consequently, the CNN system had a satisfactory diagnostic performance in the field of CP detection (sensitivity: 0.848 [95% CI: 0.692–0.932]; specificity: 0.965 [95% CI: 0.946–0.977]; and AUC: 0.98 [95% CI: 0.96–0.99]) and CP classification (sensitivity: 0.943 [95% CI: 0.927–0.955]; specificity: 0.894 [95% CI: 0.631–0.977]; and AUC: 0.95 [95% CI: 0.93–0.97]). In comparison with human endoscopists, the CNN system was comparable to the expert but significantly better than the non-expert in the field of CP classification (CNN vs. expert: RDOR: 1.03, P = 0.9654; non-expert vs. expert: RDOR: 0.29, P = 0.0559; non-expert vs. CNN: 0.18, P = 0.0342). Therefore, the CNN system exhibited a satisfactory diagnostic performance for CP and could be used as a potential clinical diagnostic tool during colonoscopy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7886136 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78861362021-02-23 Comparison of diagnostic performance between convolutional neural networks and human endoscopists for diagnosis of colorectal polyp: A systematic review and meta-analysis Xu, Yixin Ding, Wei Wang, Yibo Tan, Yulin Xi, Cheng Ye, Nianyuan Wu, Dapeng Xu, Xuezhong PLoS One Research Article Prospective randomized trials and observational studies have revealed that early detection, classification, and removal of neoplastic colorectal polyp (CP) significantly improve the prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC). The current effectiveness of the diagnostic performance of colonoscopy remains unsatisfactory with unstable accuracy. The convolutional neural networks (CNN) system based on artificial intelligence (AI) technology has demonstrated its potential to help endoscopists in increasing diagnostic accuracy. Nonetheless, several limitations of the CNN system and controversies exist on whether it provides a better diagnostic performance compared to human endoscopists. Therefore, this study sought to address this issue. Online databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE) were used to search for studies conducted up to April 2020. Besides, the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy scale-2 (QUADAS-2) was used to evaluate the quality of the enrolled studies. Moreover, publication bias was determined using the Deeks’ funnel plot. In total, 13 studies were enrolled for this meta-analysis (ranged between 2016 and 2020). Consequently, the CNN system had a satisfactory diagnostic performance in the field of CP detection (sensitivity: 0.848 [95% CI: 0.692–0.932]; specificity: 0.965 [95% CI: 0.946–0.977]; and AUC: 0.98 [95% CI: 0.96–0.99]) and CP classification (sensitivity: 0.943 [95% CI: 0.927–0.955]; specificity: 0.894 [95% CI: 0.631–0.977]; and AUC: 0.95 [95% CI: 0.93–0.97]). In comparison with human endoscopists, the CNN system was comparable to the expert but significantly better than the non-expert in the field of CP classification (CNN vs. expert: RDOR: 1.03, P = 0.9654; non-expert vs. expert: RDOR: 0.29, P = 0.0559; non-expert vs. CNN: 0.18, P = 0.0342). Therefore, the CNN system exhibited a satisfactory diagnostic performance for CP and could be used as a potential clinical diagnostic tool during colonoscopy. Public Library of Science 2021-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7886136/ /pubmed/33592048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246892 Text en © 2021 Xu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Xu, Yixin Ding, Wei Wang, Yibo Tan, Yulin Xi, Cheng Ye, Nianyuan Wu, Dapeng Xu, Xuezhong Comparison of diagnostic performance between convolutional neural networks and human endoscopists for diagnosis of colorectal polyp: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Comparison of diagnostic performance between convolutional neural networks and human endoscopists for diagnosis of colorectal polyp: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparison of diagnostic performance between convolutional neural networks and human endoscopists for diagnosis of colorectal polyp: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of diagnostic performance between convolutional neural networks and human endoscopists for diagnosis of colorectal polyp: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of diagnostic performance between convolutional neural networks and human endoscopists for diagnosis of colorectal polyp: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparison of diagnostic performance between convolutional neural networks and human endoscopists for diagnosis of colorectal polyp: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparison of diagnostic performance between convolutional neural networks and human endoscopists for diagnosis of colorectal polyp: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7886136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33592048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246892 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xuyixin comparisonofdiagnosticperformancebetweenconvolutionalneuralnetworksandhumanendoscopistsfordiagnosisofcolorectalpolypasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dingwei comparisonofdiagnosticperformancebetweenconvolutionalneuralnetworksandhumanendoscopistsfordiagnosisofcolorectalpolypasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangyibo comparisonofdiagnosticperformancebetweenconvolutionalneuralnetworksandhumanendoscopistsfordiagnosisofcolorectalpolypasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tanyulin comparisonofdiagnosticperformancebetweenconvolutionalneuralnetworksandhumanendoscopistsfordiagnosisofcolorectalpolypasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xicheng comparisonofdiagnosticperformancebetweenconvolutionalneuralnetworksandhumanendoscopistsfordiagnosisofcolorectalpolypasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yenianyuan comparisonofdiagnosticperformancebetweenconvolutionalneuralnetworksandhumanendoscopistsfordiagnosisofcolorectalpolypasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wudapeng comparisonofdiagnosticperformancebetweenconvolutionalneuralnetworksandhumanendoscopistsfordiagnosisofcolorectalpolypasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xuxuezhong comparisonofdiagnosticperformancebetweenconvolutionalneuralnetworksandhumanendoscopistsfordiagnosisofcolorectalpolypasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |