Cargando…
Broad Agreement, But Notes of Caution With the Implications of Sakaluk’s (2020) Critique of Wisman and Shrira (2020)
Autores principales: | McCarthy, Randy J., Erickson, Jennifer M., Hu, Xinyu, Pawirosetiko, Joy S., Tarleton, Hannah L., Thomas, Courtney L., Tillery, Morgan G., Sagarin, Brad J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7886183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33594531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-01929-6 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Response to Commentaries on Sakaluk (2020)
por: Sakaluk, John K.
Publicado: (2021) -
JVIM manuscript reviewers who critiqued in the 2020 calendar year
Publicado: (2021) -
Critique of the Bias-of-Crowds Model Simply Restates the Model: Reply to Connor and Evers (2020)
por: Payne, B. Keith, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Rejoinder to “The Prevalence of Cognitive Impairment Is Not Increasing in the United States: A Critique of Hale et al. (2020)”
por: Hale, Jo Mhairi, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2020 clinical practice guidelines on the management of acute limb ischaemia; a word of caution!
por: Hamady, M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)