Cargando…

USER Protocol as a Guide to Resuscitation of the Patient with Septic Shock in the Emergency Department

INTRODUCTION: Sepsis is a disease that is still associated with high mortality, in which timely interventions are related to better results. OBJECTIVE: To determine if there is a difference in in-hospital mortality, fluid balances, norepinephrine initiation and recovery time of blood pressure, when...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Devia Jaramillo, German, Menendez Ramirez, Salvador
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7886247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33603505
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S289148
_version_ 1783651759907930112
author Devia Jaramillo, German
Menendez Ramirez, Salvador
author_facet Devia Jaramillo, German
Menendez Ramirez, Salvador
author_sort Devia Jaramillo, German
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Sepsis is a disease that is still associated with high mortality, in which timely interventions are related to better results. OBJECTIVE: To determine if there is a difference in in-hospital mortality, fluid balances, norepinephrine initiation and recovery time of blood pressure, when comparing the resuscitation of the patient who is admitted to the emergency room in septic shock by applying the ultrasound protocol (USER) versus the standard of care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective, cohort study conducted in the emergency room of a highly complex hospital of patients with septic shock. RESULTS: 83 patients recruited in total. The groups were comparable in demographics, mean baseline blood pressure, disease severity given by the SOFA value, and arterial lactate. A statistically significant difference was documented in the fluid balances at 4 hours, median 1325mL (IQR:451–2455mL) in Group C versus 900mL (IQR:440–1292) in Group U (p=0.048) and at 6 hours, median 1658mL (IQR:610–2925mL) versus 1107mL (IQR:600–1500mL), p=0.026, as well as in the total fluid balance of hospital stay, median 14,564mL (IQR:8660–18,705mL) versus 8660mL (IQR:5309–16,974mL), p=0.049. On the other hand, in the USER Group, the mean blood pressure ≥ 65mmHg was achieved in 97.4% of the patients 4 hours after the start of the protocol versus 50% in Group C (p=<0.001). Mortality with the use of the protocol compared with conventional therapy was (56.4% vs 61.36%, p=0.647). CONCLUSION: The use of the USER protocol in patients with septic shock in the emergency room showed lower fluid balances at 4 and 6 hours, and of the total hospital stay, as well as earlier initiation of norepinephrine and statistically significant faster improvement in blood pressure. Although a statistically significant difference was not found in the days of ICU stay, hospitalization and in-hospital mortality, a trend was observed in the reduction of these parameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7886247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78862472021-02-17 USER Protocol as a Guide to Resuscitation of the Patient with Septic Shock in the Emergency Department Devia Jaramillo, German Menendez Ramirez, Salvador Open Access Emerg Med Original Research INTRODUCTION: Sepsis is a disease that is still associated with high mortality, in which timely interventions are related to better results. OBJECTIVE: To determine if there is a difference in in-hospital mortality, fluid balances, norepinephrine initiation and recovery time of blood pressure, when comparing the resuscitation of the patient who is admitted to the emergency room in septic shock by applying the ultrasound protocol (USER) versus the standard of care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective, cohort study conducted in the emergency room of a highly complex hospital of patients with septic shock. RESULTS: 83 patients recruited in total. The groups were comparable in demographics, mean baseline blood pressure, disease severity given by the SOFA value, and arterial lactate. A statistically significant difference was documented in the fluid balances at 4 hours, median 1325mL (IQR:451–2455mL) in Group C versus 900mL (IQR:440–1292) in Group U (p=0.048) and at 6 hours, median 1658mL (IQR:610–2925mL) versus 1107mL (IQR:600–1500mL), p=0.026, as well as in the total fluid balance of hospital stay, median 14,564mL (IQR:8660–18,705mL) versus 8660mL (IQR:5309–16,974mL), p=0.049. On the other hand, in the USER Group, the mean blood pressure ≥ 65mmHg was achieved in 97.4% of the patients 4 hours after the start of the protocol versus 50% in Group C (p=<0.001). Mortality with the use of the protocol compared with conventional therapy was (56.4% vs 61.36%, p=0.647). CONCLUSION: The use of the USER protocol in patients with septic shock in the emergency room showed lower fluid balances at 4 and 6 hours, and of the total hospital stay, as well as earlier initiation of norepinephrine and statistically significant faster improvement in blood pressure. Although a statistically significant difference was not found in the days of ICU stay, hospitalization and in-hospital mortality, a trend was observed in the reduction of these parameters. Dove 2021-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7886247/ /pubmed/33603505 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S289148 Text en © 2021 Devia Jaramillo and Menendez Ramirez. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Devia Jaramillo, German
Menendez Ramirez, Salvador
USER Protocol as a Guide to Resuscitation of the Patient with Septic Shock in the Emergency Department
title USER Protocol as a Guide to Resuscitation of the Patient with Septic Shock in the Emergency Department
title_full USER Protocol as a Guide to Resuscitation of the Patient with Septic Shock in the Emergency Department
title_fullStr USER Protocol as a Guide to Resuscitation of the Patient with Septic Shock in the Emergency Department
title_full_unstemmed USER Protocol as a Guide to Resuscitation of the Patient with Septic Shock in the Emergency Department
title_short USER Protocol as a Guide to Resuscitation of the Patient with Septic Shock in the Emergency Department
title_sort user protocol as a guide to resuscitation of the patient with septic shock in the emergency department
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7886247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33603505
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S289148
work_keys_str_mv AT deviajaramillogerman userprotocolasaguidetoresuscitationofthepatientwithsepticshockintheemergencydepartment
AT menendezramirezsalvador userprotocolasaguidetoresuscitationofthepatientwithsepticshockintheemergencydepartment