Cargando…

Characteristics of injuries according to types of personal mobility devices in a multicenter emergency department from 2011 to 2017: A cross-sectional study

Personal mobility devices (PMDs) have emerged as new factors in motor vehicle accidents, and related injuries are increasing. We aimed to describe the characteristics of PMD-related injuries presented to emergency departments (EDs) through a cross-sectional study for 7 years. This study is a multice...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Joo Yeong, Lee, Seung Chul, Lee, Sanghun, Lee, Choung Ah, Ahn, Ki Ok, Park, Ju Ok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7886398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33578587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024642
_version_ 1783651784583020544
author Kim, Joo Yeong
Lee, Seung Chul
Lee, Sanghun
Lee, Choung Ah
Ahn, Ki Ok
Park, Ju Ok
author_facet Kim, Joo Yeong
Lee, Seung Chul
Lee, Sanghun
Lee, Choung Ah
Ahn, Ki Ok
Park, Ju Ok
author_sort Kim, Joo Yeong
collection PubMed
description Personal mobility devices (PMDs) have emerged as new factors in motor vehicle accidents, and related injuries are increasing. We aimed to describe the characteristics of PMD-related injuries presented to emergency departments (EDs) through a cross-sectional study for 7 years. This study is a multicenter cross-sectional study using the Emergency Department-based Injury In-Depth Surveillance database in South Korea. We identified all PMD-related injuries from 2011 to 2017 based on text searching. We categorized them into 3 groups based on their distinguishable characteristics: electric standing scooter (E-scooter), electric self-balancing wheel (E-wheel), and electronic board (E-board). A total of 448 PMD-related injuries were observed during the observation period. E-scooter-, E-wheel-, and E-board-related injuries occurred in 284, 138, and 26 cases, respectively. Most patients were between the ages of 19 and 59 years (69.2%), men (66.3%), and injured because of leisure activity (61.2%). The mechanism of injury was mostly traffic accidents (75.2%), but regarding injuries involving E-wheel and E-board, 25.4% and 30.8% of patients slipped from the device. The most commonly injured body part was the head, which accounted for 58.1% of E-scooter injuries, 38.4% of E-wheel injuries, and 53.9% of E-board injuries. Only 6 of all patients wore a helmet at the time of accident. PMD users and PMD-sharing programs are increasing, and more accidents are expected in the future. As PMDs are convenient to move and more people are willing to use them, proper riding and safety rules based on the type of PMD are needed to reduce the risk of injury. The results of this study can be used as basic data for developing safety policies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7886398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78863982021-02-17 Characteristics of injuries according to types of personal mobility devices in a multicenter emergency department from 2011 to 2017: A cross-sectional study Kim, Joo Yeong Lee, Seung Chul Lee, Sanghun Lee, Choung Ah Ahn, Ki Ok Park, Ju Ok Medicine (Baltimore) 3900 Personal mobility devices (PMDs) have emerged as new factors in motor vehicle accidents, and related injuries are increasing. We aimed to describe the characteristics of PMD-related injuries presented to emergency departments (EDs) through a cross-sectional study for 7 years. This study is a multicenter cross-sectional study using the Emergency Department-based Injury In-Depth Surveillance database in South Korea. We identified all PMD-related injuries from 2011 to 2017 based on text searching. We categorized them into 3 groups based on their distinguishable characteristics: electric standing scooter (E-scooter), electric self-balancing wheel (E-wheel), and electronic board (E-board). A total of 448 PMD-related injuries were observed during the observation period. E-scooter-, E-wheel-, and E-board-related injuries occurred in 284, 138, and 26 cases, respectively. Most patients were between the ages of 19 and 59 years (69.2%), men (66.3%), and injured because of leisure activity (61.2%). The mechanism of injury was mostly traffic accidents (75.2%), but regarding injuries involving E-wheel and E-board, 25.4% and 30.8% of patients slipped from the device. The most commonly injured body part was the head, which accounted for 58.1% of E-scooter injuries, 38.4% of E-wheel injuries, and 53.9% of E-board injuries. Only 6 of all patients wore a helmet at the time of accident. PMD users and PMD-sharing programs are increasing, and more accidents are expected in the future. As PMDs are convenient to move and more people are willing to use them, proper riding and safety rules based on the type of PMD are needed to reduce the risk of injury. The results of this study can be used as basic data for developing safety policies. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7886398/ /pubmed/33578587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024642 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle 3900
Kim, Joo Yeong
Lee, Seung Chul
Lee, Sanghun
Lee, Choung Ah
Ahn, Ki Ok
Park, Ju Ok
Characteristics of injuries according to types of personal mobility devices in a multicenter emergency department from 2011 to 2017: A cross-sectional study
title Characteristics of injuries according to types of personal mobility devices in a multicenter emergency department from 2011 to 2017: A cross-sectional study
title_full Characteristics of injuries according to types of personal mobility devices in a multicenter emergency department from 2011 to 2017: A cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Characteristics of injuries according to types of personal mobility devices in a multicenter emergency department from 2011 to 2017: A cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Characteristics of injuries according to types of personal mobility devices in a multicenter emergency department from 2011 to 2017: A cross-sectional study
title_short Characteristics of injuries according to types of personal mobility devices in a multicenter emergency department from 2011 to 2017: A cross-sectional study
title_sort characteristics of injuries according to types of personal mobility devices in a multicenter emergency department from 2011 to 2017: a cross-sectional study
topic 3900
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7886398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33578587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024642
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjooyeong characteristicsofinjuriesaccordingtotypesofpersonalmobilitydevicesinamulticenteremergencydepartmentfrom2011to2017acrosssectionalstudy
AT leeseungchul characteristicsofinjuriesaccordingtotypesofpersonalmobilitydevicesinamulticenteremergencydepartmentfrom2011to2017acrosssectionalstudy
AT leesanghun characteristicsofinjuriesaccordingtotypesofpersonalmobilitydevicesinamulticenteremergencydepartmentfrom2011to2017acrosssectionalstudy
AT leechoungah characteristicsofinjuriesaccordingtotypesofpersonalmobilitydevicesinamulticenteremergencydepartmentfrom2011to2017acrosssectionalstudy
AT ahnkiok characteristicsofinjuriesaccordingtotypesofpersonalmobilitydevicesinamulticenteremergencydepartmentfrom2011to2017acrosssectionalstudy
AT parkjuok characteristicsofinjuriesaccordingtotypesofpersonalmobilitydevicesinamulticenteremergencydepartmentfrom2011to2017acrosssectionalstudy