Cargando…

Laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is being performed more frequently and has recently become an established oncologic surgical method for right hemicolectomy. Despite its advantages, such as its association with early mobilization, a short hospital stay, early bowel movement, mild postoperative pain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koc, Mehmet Ali, Celik, Suleyman Utku, Guner, Volkan, Akyol, Cihangir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7886421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33578570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024613
_version_ 1783651789669662720
author Koc, Mehmet Ali
Celik, Suleyman Utku
Guner, Volkan
Akyol, Cihangir
author_facet Koc, Mehmet Ali
Celik, Suleyman Utku
Guner, Volkan
Akyol, Cihangir
author_sort Koc, Mehmet Ali
collection PubMed
description Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is being performed more frequently and has recently become an established oncologic surgical method for right hemicolectomy. Despite its advantages, such as its association with early mobilization, a short hospital stay, early bowel movement, mild postoperative pain, and good cosmesis, CME is technically demanding and carries the risk of severe complications. This study aims to compare the clinical, pathological, and oncological results of open and laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME. The data of 76 patients who underwent right hemicolectomy with CME and high vascular ligation were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether the open or laparoscopic technique was used. Thirty-two patients underwent open right hemicolectomy, and 44 patients underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. The 2 groups were similar in age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, abdominal surgical history, tumor localization, and operation time. No significant differences were found regarding the specimen length, tumor size, harvested lymph nodes, number of metastatic lymph nodes, or tumor grade. According to the Clavien–Dindo classification system, the laparoscopic group had significantly fewer complications than did the open group (11.4% vs 31.2%; P = .04). The open group had a longer postoperative hospital stay than did the laparoscopic hemicolectomy group (9.9 ± 4.7 vs 7.2 ± 3.1 days; P = .002). In addition, the groups were similar with respect to disease-free survival (P = .14) and overall survival (P = .06).The data in this study demonstrated that no differences exist between the open and laparoscopic techniques concerning pathological and oncological results. However, significantly fewer complications and a shorter length of hospital stay were observed in the laparoscopic group than in the open group. Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME and central vascular ligation is a safe and feasible surgical procedure and should be considered the standard technique for right-sided colon cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7886421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78864212021-02-17 Laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer Koc, Mehmet Ali Celik, Suleyman Utku Guner, Volkan Akyol, Cihangir Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is being performed more frequently and has recently become an established oncologic surgical method for right hemicolectomy. Despite its advantages, such as its association with early mobilization, a short hospital stay, early bowel movement, mild postoperative pain, and good cosmesis, CME is technically demanding and carries the risk of severe complications. This study aims to compare the clinical, pathological, and oncological results of open and laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME. The data of 76 patients who underwent right hemicolectomy with CME and high vascular ligation were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether the open or laparoscopic technique was used. Thirty-two patients underwent open right hemicolectomy, and 44 patients underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. The 2 groups were similar in age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, abdominal surgical history, tumor localization, and operation time. No significant differences were found regarding the specimen length, tumor size, harvested lymph nodes, number of metastatic lymph nodes, or tumor grade. According to the Clavien–Dindo classification system, the laparoscopic group had significantly fewer complications than did the open group (11.4% vs 31.2%; P = .04). The open group had a longer postoperative hospital stay than did the laparoscopic hemicolectomy group (9.9 ± 4.7 vs 7.2 ± 3.1 days; P = .002). In addition, the groups were similar with respect to disease-free survival (P = .14) and overall survival (P = .06).The data in this study demonstrated that no differences exist between the open and laparoscopic techniques concerning pathological and oncological results. However, significantly fewer complications and a shorter length of hospital stay were observed in the laparoscopic group than in the open group. Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME and central vascular ligation is a safe and feasible surgical procedure and should be considered the standard technique for right-sided colon cancer. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7886421/ /pubmed/33578570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024613 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle 7100
Koc, Mehmet Ali
Celik, Suleyman Utku
Guner, Volkan
Akyol, Cihangir
Laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer
title Laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer
title_full Laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer
title_fullStr Laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer
title_short Laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer
title_sort laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7886421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33578570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024613
work_keys_str_mv AT kocmehmetali laparoscopicvsopencompletemesocolicexcisionwithcentralvascularligationforrightsidedcoloncancer
AT celiksuleymanutku laparoscopicvsopencompletemesocolicexcisionwithcentralvascularligationforrightsidedcoloncancer
AT gunervolkan laparoscopicvsopencompletemesocolicexcisionwithcentralvascularligationforrightsidedcoloncancer
AT akyolcihangir laparoscopicvsopencompletemesocolicexcisionwithcentralvascularligationforrightsidedcoloncancer