Cargando…
Laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer
Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is being performed more frequently and has recently become an established oncologic surgical method for right hemicolectomy. Despite its advantages, such as its association with early mobilization, a short hospital stay, early bowel movement, mild postoperative pain...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7886421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33578570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024613 |
_version_ | 1783651789669662720 |
---|---|
author | Koc, Mehmet Ali Celik, Suleyman Utku Guner, Volkan Akyol, Cihangir |
author_facet | Koc, Mehmet Ali Celik, Suleyman Utku Guner, Volkan Akyol, Cihangir |
author_sort | Koc, Mehmet Ali |
collection | PubMed |
description | Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is being performed more frequently and has recently become an established oncologic surgical method for right hemicolectomy. Despite its advantages, such as its association with early mobilization, a short hospital stay, early bowel movement, mild postoperative pain, and good cosmesis, CME is technically demanding and carries the risk of severe complications. This study aims to compare the clinical, pathological, and oncological results of open and laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME. The data of 76 patients who underwent right hemicolectomy with CME and high vascular ligation were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether the open or laparoscopic technique was used. Thirty-two patients underwent open right hemicolectomy, and 44 patients underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. The 2 groups were similar in age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, abdominal surgical history, tumor localization, and operation time. No significant differences were found regarding the specimen length, tumor size, harvested lymph nodes, number of metastatic lymph nodes, or tumor grade. According to the Clavien–Dindo classification system, the laparoscopic group had significantly fewer complications than did the open group (11.4% vs 31.2%; P = .04). The open group had a longer postoperative hospital stay than did the laparoscopic hemicolectomy group (9.9 ± 4.7 vs 7.2 ± 3.1 days; P = .002). In addition, the groups were similar with respect to disease-free survival (P = .14) and overall survival (P = .06).The data in this study demonstrated that no differences exist between the open and laparoscopic techniques concerning pathological and oncological results. However, significantly fewer complications and a shorter length of hospital stay were observed in the laparoscopic group than in the open group. Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME and central vascular ligation is a safe and feasible surgical procedure and should be considered the standard technique for right-sided colon cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7886421 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78864212021-02-17 Laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer Koc, Mehmet Ali Celik, Suleyman Utku Guner, Volkan Akyol, Cihangir Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is being performed more frequently and has recently become an established oncologic surgical method for right hemicolectomy. Despite its advantages, such as its association with early mobilization, a short hospital stay, early bowel movement, mild postoperative pain, and good cosmesis, CME is technically demanding and carries the risk of severe complications. This study aims to compare the clinical, pathological, and oncological results of open and laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME. The data of 76 patients who underwent right hemicolectomy with CME and high vascular ligation were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether the open or laparoscopic technique was used. Thirty-two patients underwent open right hemicolectomy, and 44 patients underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. The 2 groups were similar in age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, abdominal surgical history, tumor localization, and operation time. No significant differences were found regarding the specimen length, tumor size, harvested lymph nodes, number of metastatic lymph nodes, or tumor grade. According to the Clavien–Dindo classification system, the laparoscopic group had significantly fewer complications than did the open group (11.4% vs 31.2%; P = .04). The open group had a longer postoperative hospital stay than did the laparoscopic hemicolectomy group (9.9 ± 4.7 vs 7.2 ± 3.1 days; P = .002). In addition, the groups were similar with respect to disease-free survival (P = .14) and overall survival (P = .06).The data in this study demonstrated that no differences exist between the open and laparoscopic techniques concerning pathological and oncological results. However, significantly fewer complications and a shorter length of hospital stay were observed in the laparoscopic group than in the open group. Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME and central vascular ligation is a safe and feasible surgical procedure and should be considered the standard technique for right-sided colon cancer. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7886421/ /pubmed/33578570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024613 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | 7100 Koc, Mehmet Ali Celik, Suleyman Utku Guner, Volkan Akyol, Cihangir Laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer |
title | Laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer |
title_full | Laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer |
title_short | Laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer |
title_sort | laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer |
topic | 7100 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7886421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33578570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024613 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kocmehmetali laparoscopicvsopencompletemesocolicexcisionwithcentralvascularligationforrightsidedcoloncancer AT celiksuleymanutku laparoscopicvsopencompletemesocolicexcisionwithcentralvascularligationforrightsidedcoloncancer AT gunervolkan laparoscopicvsopencompletemesocolicexcisionwithcentralvascularligationforrightsidedcoloncancer AT akyolcihangir laparoscopicvsopencompletemesocolicexcisionwithcentralvascularligationforrightsidedcoloncancer |