Cargando…

Breath-Synchronized Nebulized Surfactant in a Porcine Model of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Effective treatment options for surfactant therapy in acute respiratory distress syndrome and coronavirus disease 2019 have not been established. To conduct preclinical studies in vitro and in vivo to evaluate efficiency, particle size, dosing, safety, and efficacy of inhaled surfactant using a brea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: DiBlasi, Robert M., Kajimoto, Masaki, Poli, Jonathan A., Deutsch, Gail, Pfeiffer, Juergen, Zimmerman, Joseph, Crotwell, David N., Malone, Patrik, Fink, James B., Ringer, Coral, Uthamanthil, Rajesh, Ledee, Dolena, Portman, Michael A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7886457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33604579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000338
_version_ 1783651798172565504
author DiBlasi, Robert M.
Kajimoto, Masaki
Poli, Jonathan A.
Deutsch, Gail
Pfeiffer, Juergen
Zimmerman, Joseph
Crotwell, David N.
Malone, Patrik
Fink, James B.
Ringer, Coral
Uthamanthil, Rajesh
Ledee, Dolena
Portman, Michael A.
author_facet DiBlasi, Robert M.
Kajimoto, Masaki
Poli, Jonathan A.
Deutsch, Gail
Pfeiffer, Juergen
Zimmerman, Joseph
Crotwell, David N.
Malone, Patrik
Fink, James B.
Ringer, Coral
Uthamanthil, Rajesh
Ledee, Dolena
Portman, Michael A.
author_sort DiBlasi, Robert M.
collection PubMed
description Effective treatment options for surfactant therapy in acute respiratory distress syndrome and coronavirus disease 2019 have not been established. To conduct preclinical studies in vitro and in vivo to evaluate efficiency, particle size, dosing, safety, and efficacy of inhaled surfactant using a breath-synchronized, nebulized delivery system in an established acute respiratory distress syndrome model. DESIGN: Preclinical study. SETTING: Research laboratory. SUBJECTS: Anesthetized pigs. INTERVENTION: In vitro analysis included particle size distribution and inhaled dose during simulated ventilation using a novel breath-synchronized nebulizer. Physiologic effects of inhaled aerosolized surfactant (treatment) were compared with aerosolized normal saline (control) in an adult porcine model (weight of 34.3 ± 0.6 kg) of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (Pao(2)/Fio(2) <100) with lung lavages and ventilator-induced lung injury during invasive ventilation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mass median aerosol diameter was 2.8 µm. In vitro dose delivered distal to the endotracheal tube during mechanical ventilation was 85% ± 5%. Nebulizers were functional up to 20 doses of 108 mg of surfactant. Surfactant-treated animals (n = 4) exhibited rapid improvement in oxygenation with nearly full recovery of Pao(2)/Fio(2) (~300) and end-expiratory lung volumes with nominal dose less than 30 mg/kg of surfactant, whereas control subjects (n = 3) maintained Pao(2)/Fio(2) less than 100 over 4.5 hours with reduced end-expiratory lung volume. There was notably greater surfactant phospholipid content and lower indicators of lung inflammation and pathologic lung injury in surfactant-treated pigs than controls. There were no peridosing complications associated with nebulized surfactant, but surfactant-treated animals had progressively higher airway resistance post treatment than controls with no differences in ventilation effects between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Breath-synchronized, nebulized bovine surfactant appears to be a safe and feasible treatment option for use in coronavirus disease 2019 and other severe forms of acute respiratory distress syndrome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7886457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78864572021-02-17 Breath-Synchronized Nebulized Surfactant in a Porcine Model of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome DiBlasi, Robert M. Kajimoto, Masaki Poli, Jonathan A. Deutsch, Gail Pfeiffer, Juergen Zimmerman, Joseph Crotwell, David N. Malone, Patrik Fink, James B. Ringer, Coral Uthamanthil, Rajesh Ledee, Dolena Portman, Michael A. Crit Care Explor Original Basic Science Report Effective treatment options for surfactant therapy in acute respiratory distress syndrome and coronavirus disease 2019 have not been established. To conduct preclinical studies in vitro and in vivo to evaluate efficiency, particle size, dosing, safety, and efficacy of inhaled surfactant using a breath-synchronized, nebulized delivery system in an established acute respiratory distress syndrome model. DESIGN: Preclinical study. SETTING: Research laboratory. SUBJECTS: Anesthetized pigs. INTERVENTION: In vitro analysis included particle size distribution and inhaled dose during simulated ventilation using a novel breath-synchronized nebulizer. Physiologic effects of inhaled aerosolized surfactant (treatment) were compared with aerosolized normal saline (control) in an adult porcine model (weight of 34.3 ± 0.6 kg) of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (Pao(2)/Fio(2) <100) with lung lavages and ventilator-induced lung injury during invasive ventilation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mass median aerosol diameter was 2.8 µm. In vitro dose delivered distal to the endotracheal tube during mechanical ventilation was 85% ± 5%. Nebulizers were functional up to 20 doses of 108 mg of surfactant. Surfactant-treated animals (n = 4) exhibited rapid improvement in oxygenation with nearly full recovery of Pao(2)/Fio(2) (~300) and end-expiratory lung volumes with nominal dose less than 30 mg/kg of surfactant, whereas control subjects (n = 3) maintained Pao(2)/Fio(2) less than 100 over 4.5 hours with reduced end-expiratory lung volume. There was notably greater surfactant phospholipid content and lower indicators of lung inflammation and pathologic lung injury in surfactant-treated pigs than controls. There were no peridosing complications associated with nebulized surfactant, but surfactant-treated animals had progressively higher airway resistance post treatment than controls with no differences in ventilation effects between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Breath-synchronized, nebulized bovine surfactant appears to be a safe and feasible treatment option for use in coronavirus disease 2019 and other severe forms of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7886457/ /pubmed/33604579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000338 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Basic Science Report
DiBlasi, Robert M.
Kajimoto, Masaki
Poli, Jonathan A.
Deutsch, Gail
Pfeiffer, Juergen
Zimmerman, Joseph
Crotwell, David N.
Malone, Patrik
Fink, James B.
Ringer, Coral
Uthamanthil, Rajesh
Ledee, Dolena
Portman, Michael A.
Breath-Synchronized Nebulized Surfactant in a Porcine Model of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title Breath-Synchronized Nebulized Surfactant in a Porcine Model of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_full Breath-Synchronized Nebulized Surfactant in a Porcine Model of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_fullStr Breath-Synchronized Nebulized Surfactant in a Porcine Model of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Breath-Synchronized Nebulized Surfactant in a Porcine Model of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_short Breath-Synchronized Nebulized Surfactant in a Porcine Model of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_sort breath-synchronized nebulized surfactant in a porcine model of acute respiratory distress syndrome
topic Original Basic Science Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7886457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33604579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000338
work_keys_str_mv AT diblasirobertm breathsynchronizednebulizedsurfactantinaporcinemodelofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT kajimotomasaki breathsynchronizednebulizedsurfactantinaporcinemodelofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT polijonathana breathsynchronizednebulizedsurfactantinaporcinemodelofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT deutschgail breathsynchronizednebulizedsurfactantinaporcinemodelofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT pfeifferjuergen breathsynchronizednebulizedsurfactantinaporcinemodelofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT zimmermanjoseph breathsynchronizednebulizedsurfactantinaporcinemodelofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT crotwelldavidn breathsynchronizednebulizedsurfactantinaporcinemodelofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT malonepatrik breathsynchronizednebulizedsurfactantinaporcinemodelofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT finkjamesb breathsynchronizednebulizedsurfactantinaporcinemodelofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT ringercoral breathsynchronizednebulizedsurfactantinaporcinemodelofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT uthamanthilrajesh breathsynchronizednebulizedsurfactantinaporcinemodelofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT ledeedolena breathsynchronizednebulizedsurfactantinaporcinemodelofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT portmanmichaela breathsynchronizednebulizedsurfactantinaporcinemodelofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome