Cargando…

Do isolates from pharyngeal and rectal swabs match blood culture bacterial pathogens in septic VLBW infants? A pilot, cross-sectional study

Serial body site swabbing is used to monitor horizontal spread of aggressive bacterial species in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Since colonization/carriage is thought to precede systemic infection, one might expect to retrieve colonizing pathogens from blood cultures. This hypothesis, how...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Capasso, Letizia, Maddaluno, Sergio, Coppola, Clara, Dolce, Pasquale, di Cola, Giuseppe Schiano, Sierchio, Enrico, Borrrelli, Angela Carla, Bagattini, Maria, Esposito, Eliana Pia, Zarrilli, Raffaele, Antonaki, Eleni, Catania, Maria Rosaria, Raimondi, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7886719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03788-0
_version_ 1783651855919742976
author Capasso, Letizia
Maddaluno, Sergio
Coppola, Clara
Dolce, Pasquale
di Cola, Giuseppe Schiano
Sierchio, Enrico
Borrrelli, Angela Carla
Bagattini, Maria
Esposito, Eliana Pia
Zarrilli, Raffaele
Antonaki, Eleni
Catania, Maria Rosaria
Raimondi, Francesco
author_facet Capasso, Letizia
Maddaluno, Sergio
Coppola, Clara
Dolce, Pasquale
di Cola, Giuseppe Schiano
Sierchio, Enrico
Borrrelli, Angela Carla
Bagattini, Maria
Esposito, Eliana Pia
Zarrilli, Raffaele
Antonaki, Eleni
Catania, Maria Rosaria
Raimondi, Francesco
author_sort Capasso, Letizia
collection PubMed
description Serial body site swabbing is used to monitor horizontal spread of aggressive bacterial species in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Since colonization/carriage is thought to precede systemic infection, one might expect to retrieve colonizing pathogens from blood cultures. This hypothesis, however, has not been fully investigated in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants that are at high sepsis’ risk. The primary outcome was, in a population of VLBW infants with late-onset sepsis, the matching between blood culture results and pathogens isolated from rectal and nose/pharyngeal surveillance swabs in the preceding 2 weeks. The secondary outcomes were the site of swabbing and time interval from colonization to blood culture positivity. Out of 333 VLBW neonates, 80 (24%) were diagnosed with bacterial sepsis. In 46 (57%) neonates, the blood culture showed the same pathogen species cultured from a swab. Of these, 30 were isolated from infants with both body sites colonized with an average time interval of 3.5 days; 2/16 were isolated from rectal swabs and 14 /16 from nose/pharyngeal samples. Conclusion: Our data show a fair correspondence between bacteria colonizing the nasopharynx and/or the rectum and pathogens later isolated from blood cultures. This association depends on the swabbing site, number of sites, and pathogen species. Although these data constitute valuable results, they are not sufficient for providing the sole base of a thoughtful clinical decision. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00431-020-03788-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7886719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78867192021-02-25 Do isolates from pharyngeal and rectal swabs match blood culture bacterial pathogens in septic VLBW infants? A pilot, cross-sectional study Capasso, Letizia Maddaluno, Sergio Coppola, Clara Dolce, Pasquale di Cola, Giuseppe Schiano Sierchio, Enrico Borrrelli, Angela Carla Bagattini, Maria Esposito, Eliana Pia Zarrilli, Raffaele Antonaki, Eleni Catania, Maria Rosaria Raimondi, Francesco Eur J Pediatr Original Article Serial body site swabbing is used to monitor horizontal spread of aggressive bacterial species in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Since colonization/carriage is thought to precede systemic infection, one might expect to retrieve colonizing pathogens from blood cultures. This hypothesis, however, has not been fully investigated in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants that are at high sepsis’ risk. The primary outcome was, in a population of VLBW infants with late-onset sepsis, the matching between blood culture results and pathogens isolated from rectal and nose/pharyngeal surveillance swabs in the preceding 2 weeks. The secondary outcomes were the site of swabbing and time interval from colonization to blood culture positivity. Out of 333 VLBW neonates, 80 (24%) were diagnosed with bacterial sepsis. In 46 (57%) neonates, the blood culture showed the same pathogen species cultured from a swab. Of these, 30 were isolated from infants with both body sites colonized with an average time interval of 3.5 days; 2/16 were isolated from rectal swabs and 14 /16 from nose/pharyngeal samples. Conclusion: Our data show a fair correspondence between bacteria colonizing the nasopharynx and/or the rectum and pathogens later isolated from blood cultures. This association depends on the swabbing site, number of sites, and pathogen species. Although these data constitute valuable results, they are not sufficient for providing the sole base of a thoughtful clinical decision. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00431-020-03788-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-08-28 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7886719/ /pubmed/32860099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03788-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Capasso, Letizia
Maddaluno, Sergio
Coppola, Clara
Dolce, Pasquale
di Cola, Giuseppe Schiano
Sierchio, Enrico
Borrrelli, Angela Carla
Bagattini, Maria
Esposito, Eliana Pia
Zarrilli, Raffaele
Antonaki, Eleni
Catania, Maria Rosaria
Raimondi, Francesco
Do isolates from pharyngeal and rectal swabs match blood culture bacterial pathogens in septic VLBW infants? A pilot, cross-sectional study
title Do isolates from pharyngeal and rectal swabs match blood culture bacterial pathogens in septic VLBW infants? A pilot, cross-sectional study
title_full Do isolates from pharyngeal and rectal swabs match blood culture bacterial pathogens in septic VLBW infants? A pilot, cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Do isolates from pharyngeal and rectal swabs match blood culture bacterial pathogens in septic VLBW infants? A pilot, cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Do isolates from pharyngeal and rectal swabs match blood culture bacterial pathogens in septic VLBW infants? A pilot, cross-sectional study
title_short Do isolates from pharyngeal and rectal swabs match blood culture bacterial pathogens in septic VLBW infants? A pilot, cross-sectional study
title_sort do isolates from pharyngeal and rectal swabs match blood culture bacterial pathogens in septic vlbw infants? a pilot, cross-sectional study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7886719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03788-0
work_keys_str_mv AT capassoletizia doisolatesfrompharyngealandrectalswabsmatchbloodculturebacterialpathogensinsepticvlbwinfantsapilotcrosssectionalstudy
AT maddalunosergio doisolatesfrompharyngealandrectalswabsmatchbloodculturebacterialpathogensinsepticvlbwinfantsapilotcrosssectionalstudy
AT coppolaclara doisolatesfrompharyngealandrectalswabsmatchbloodculturebacterialpathogensinsepticvlbwinfantsapilotcrosssectionalstudy
AT dolcepasquale doisolatesfrompharyngealandrectalswabsmatchbloodculturebacterialpathogensinsepticvlbwinfantsapilotcrosssectionalstudy
AT dicolagiuseppeschiano doisolatesfrompharyngealandrectalswabsmatchbloodculturebacterialpathogensinsepticvlbwinfantsapilotcrosssectionalstudy
AT sierchioenrico doisolatesfrompharyngealandrectalswabsmatchbloodculturebacterialpathogensinsepticvlbwinfantsapilotcrosssectionalstudy
AT borrrelliangelacarla doisolatesfrompharyngealandrectalswabsmatchbloodculturebacterialpathogensinsepticvlbwinfantsapilotcrosssectionalstudy
AT bagattinimaria doisolatesfrompharyngealandrectalswabsmatchbloodculturebacterialpathogensinsepticvlbwinfantsapilotcrosssectionalstudy
AT espositoelianapia doisolatesfrompharyngealandrectalswabsmatchbloodculturebacterialpathogensinsepticvlbwinfantsapilotcrosssectionalstudy
AT zarrilliraffaele doisolatesfrompharyngealandrectalswabsmatchbloodculturebacterialpathogensinsepticvlbwinfantsapilotcrosssectionalstudy
AT antonakieleni doisolatesfrompharyngealandrectalswabsmatchbloodculturebacterialpathogensinsepticvlbwinfantsapilotcrosssectionalstudy
AT cataniamariarosaria doisolatesfrompharyngealandrectalswabsmatchbloodculturebacterialpathogensinsepticvlbwinfantsapilotcrosssectionalstudy
AT raimondifrancesco doisolatesfrompharyngealandrectalswabsmatchbloodculturebacterialpathogensinsepticvlbwinfantsapilotcrosssectionalstudy