Cargando…

Application of clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area, a propensity score matching study and comparison with open gastrectomy

BACKGROUND: Suprapancreatic lymphadenectomy is the essence of D2 radical gastric cancer surgery. The present study aimed to describe clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area. METHODS: The data from gastric cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment from Se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Hua, Zhang, Wei-Han, Liu, Kai, Dan, Yu-Qing, Chen, Xin-Zu, Yang, Kun, Chen, Zhi-Xin, Chen, Jia-Ping, Zhou, Zong-Guang, Hu, Jian-Kun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7886740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33030588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08070-w
_version_ 1783651860881604608
author Yang, Hua
Zhang, Wei-Han
Liu, Kai
Dan, Yu-Qing
Chen, Xin-Zu
Yang, Kun
Chen, Zhi-Xin
Chen, Jia-Ping
Zhou, Zong-Guang
Hu, Jian-Kun
author_facet Yang, Hua
Zhang, Wei-Han
Liu, Kai
Dan, Yu-Qing
Chen, Xin-Zu
Yang, Kun
Chen, Zhi-Xin
Chen, Jia-Ping
Zhou, Zong-Guang
Hu, Jian-Kun
author_sort Yang, Hua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Suprapancreatic lymphadenectomy is the essence of D2 radical gastric cancer surgery. The present study aimed to describe clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area. METHODS: The data from gastric cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment from September 2016 to December 2018 were collected. Patients were divided into clockwise modularized lymphadenectomy (CML) and traditional open gastrectomy (OG) groups according to the surgical treatment strategy. The propensity score matching method was utilized to balance the baseline characteristics between the two groups. RESULTS: Finally, 551 gastric cancer patients were included in the present study. Following propensity score matching, 106 pairs of patients in the CML group and OG group were included in the final analysis. The CML group had more total examined lymph nodes (36, IQR 28–44.74 vs. 29, IQR 29–39.5, p = 0.002) and no. 9 station nodes (2, IQR 1–5 vs. 2, IQR 1–3, p = 0.007) than the OG group. There was less intraoperative blood loss (30, IQR 20–80 ml vs. 80, IQR 50–80 ml, p < 0.001) and a longer surgical duration (262.5 min, IQR 220–303.25 min vs. 232, IQR 220–255 min, p < 0.001) in the CML group than in the OG group. The incidence of postoperative complications (19.8% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.591) and postoperative hospital stay (8, IQR 7–9 days vs. 8, IQR 7–9 days, p = 0.452) were comparable between the CML and OG groups. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer surgery is technically demanding. Clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area can attain similar effects as traditional open surgery and without an increase in postoperative adverse events. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-08070-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7886740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78867402021-03-03 Application of clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area, a propensity score matching study and comparison with open gastrectomy Yang, Hua Zhang, Wei-Han Liu, Kai Dan, Yu-Qing Chen, Xin-Zu Yang, Kun Chen, Zhi-Xin Chen, Jia-Ping Zhou, Zong-Guang Hu, Jian-Kun Surg Endosc Dynamic Manuscript BACKGROUND: Suprapancreatic lymphadenectomy is the essence of D2 radical gastric cancer surgery. The present study aimed to describe clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area. METHODS: The data from gastric cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment from September 2016 to December 2018 were collected. Patients were divided into clockwise modularized lymphadenectomy (CML) and traditional open gastrectomy (OG) groups according to the surgical treatment strategy. The propensity score matching method was utilized to balance the baseline characteristics between the two groups. RESULTS: Finally, 551 gastric cancer patients were included in the present study. Following propensity score matching, 106 pairs of patients in the CML group and OG group were included in the final analysis. The CML group had more total examined lymph nodes (36, IQR 28–44.74 vs. 29, IQR 29–39.5, p = 0.002) and no. 9 station nodes (2, IQR 1–5 vs. 2, IQR 1–3, p = 0.007) than the OG group. There was less intraoperative blood loss (30, IQR 20–80 ml vs. 80, IQR 50–80 ml, p < 0.001) and a longer surgical duration (262.5 min, IQR 220–303.25 min vs. 232, IQR 220–255 min, p < 0.001) in the CML group than in the OG group. The incidence of postoperative complications (19.8% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.591) and postoperative hospital stay (8, IQR 7–9 days vs. 8, IQR 7–9 days, p = 0.452) were comparable between the CML and OG groups. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer surgery is technically demanding. Clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area can attain similar effects as traditional open surgery and without an increase in postoperative adverse events. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-08070-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-10-08 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7886740/ /pubmed/33030588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08070-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Dynamic Manuscript
Yang, Hua
Zhang, Wei-Han
Liu, Kai
Dan, Yu-Qing
Chen, Xin-Zu
Yang, Kun
Chen, Zhi-Xin
Chen, Jia-Ping
Zhou, Zong-Guang
Hu, Jian-Kun
Application of clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area, a propensity score matching study and comparison with open gastrectomy
title Application of clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area, a propensity score matching study and comparison with open gastrectomy
title_full Application of clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area, a propensity score matching study and comparison with open gastrectomy
title_fullStr Application of clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area, a propensity score matching study and comparison with open gastrectomy
title_full_unstemmed Application of clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area, a propensity score matching study and comparison with open gastrectomy
title_short Application of clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area, a propensity score matching study and comparison with open gastrectomy
title_sort application of clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area, a propensity score matching study and comparison with open gastrectomy
topic Dynamic Manuscript
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7886740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33030588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08070-w
work_keys_str_mv AT yanghua applicationofclockwisemodularizedlaparoscopiclymphadenectomyinthesuprapancreaticareaapropensityscorematchingstudyandcomparisonwithopengastrectomy
AT zhangweihan applicationofclockwisemodularizedlaparoscopiclymphadenectomyinthesuprapancreaticareaapropensityscorematchingstudyandcomparisonwithopengastrectomy
AT liukai applicationofclockwisemodularizedlaparoscopiclymphadenectomyinthesuprapancreaticareaapropensityscorematchingstudyandcomparisonwithopengastrectomy
AT danyuqing applicationofclockwisemodularizedlaparoscopiclymphadenectomyinthesuprapancreaticareaapropensityscorematchingstudyandcomparisonwithopengastrectomy
AT chenxinzu applicationofclockwisemodularizedlaparoscopiclymphadenectomyinthesuprapancreaticareaapropensityscorematchingstudyandcomparisonwithopengastrectomy
AT yangkun applicationofclockwisemodularizedlaparoscopiclymphadenectomyinthesuprapancreaticareaapropensityscorematchingstudyandcomparisonwithopengastrectomy
AT chenzhixin applicationofclockwisemodularizedlaparoscopiclymphadenectomyinthesuprapancreaticareaapropensityscorematchingstudyandcomparisonwithopengastrectomy
AT chenjiaping applicationofclockwisemodularizedlaparoscopiclymphadenectomyinthesuprapancreaticareaapropensityscorematchingstudyandcomparisonwithopengastrectomy
AT zhouzongguang applicationofclockwisemodularizedlaparoscopiclymphadenectomyinthesuprapancreaticareaapropensityscorematchingstudyandcomparisonwithopengastrectomy
AT hujiankun applicationofclockwisemodularizedlaparoscopiclymphadenectomyinthesuprapancreaticareaapropensityscorematchingstudyandcomparisonwithopengastrectomy