Cargando…
Application of clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area, a propensity score matching study and comparison with open gastrectomy
BACKGROUND: Suprapancreatic lymphadenectomy is the essence of D2 radical gastric cancer surgery. The present study aimed to describe clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area. METHODS: The data from gastric cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment from Se...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7886740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33030588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08070-w |
_version_ | 1783651860881604608 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Hua Zhang, Wei-Han Liu, Kai Dan, Yu-Qing Chen, Xin-Zu Yang, Kun Chen, Zhi-Xin Chen, Jia-Ping Zhou, Zong-Guang Hu, Jian-Kun |
author_facet | Yang, Hua Zhang, Wei-Han Liu, Kai Dan, Yu-Qing Chen, Xin-Zu Yang, Kun Chen, Zhi-Xin Chen, Jia-Ping Zhou, Zong-Guang Hu, Jian-Kun |
author_sort | Yang, Hua |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Suprapancreatic lymphadenectomy is the essence of D2 radical gastric cancer surgery. The present study aimed to describe clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area. METHODS: The data from gastric cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment from September 2016 to December 2018 were collected. Patients were divided into clockwise modularized lymphadenectomy (CML) and traditional open gastrectomy (OG) groups according to the surgical treatment strategy. The propensity score matching method was utilized to balance the baseline characteristics between the two groups. RESULTS: Finally, 551 gastric cancer patients were included in the present study. Following propensity score matching, 106 pairs of patients in the CML group and OG group were included in the final analysis. The CML group had more total examined lymph nodes (36, IQR 28–44.74 vs. 29, IQR 29–39.5, p = 0.002) and no. 9 station nodes (2, IQR 1–5 vs. 2, IQR 1–3, p = 0.007) than the OG group. There was less intraoperative blood loss (30, IQR 20–80 ml vs. 80, IQR 50–80 ml, p < 0.001) and a longer surgical duration (262.5 min, IQR 220–303.25 min vs. 232, IQR 220–255 min, p < 0.001) in the CML group than in the OG group. The incidence of postoperative complications (19.8% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.591) and postoperative hospital stay (8, IQR 7–9 days vs. 8, IQR 7–9 days, p = 0.452) were comparable between the CML and OG groups. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer surgery is technically demanding. Clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area can attain similar effects as traditional open surgery and without an increase in postoperative adverse events. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-08070-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7886740 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78867402021-03-03 Application of clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area, a propensity score matching study and comparison with open gastrectomy Yang, Hua Zhang, Wei-Han Liu, Kai Dan, Yu-Qing Chen, Xin-Zu Yang, Kun Chen, Zhi-Xin Chen, Jia-Ping Zhou, Zong-Guang Hu, Jian-Kun Surg Endosc Dynamic Manuscript BACKGROUND: Suprapancreatic lymphadenectomy is the essence of D2 radical gastric cancer surgery. The present study aimed to describe clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area. METHODS: The data from gastric cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment from September 2016 to December 2018 were collected. Patients were divided into clockwise modularized lymphadenectomy (CML) and traditional open gastrectomy (OG) groups according to the surgical treatment strategy. The propensity score matching method was utilized to balance the baseline characteristics between the two groups. RESULTS: Finally, 551 gastric cancer patients were included in the present study. Following propensity score matching, 106 pairs of patients in the CML group and OG group were included in the final analysis. The CML group had more total examined lymph nodes (36, IQR 28–44.74 vs. 29, IQR 29–39.5, p = 0.002) and no. 9 station nodes (2, IQR 1–5 vs. 2, IQR 1–3, p = 0.007) than the OG group. There was less intraoperative blood loss (30, IQR 20–80 ml vs. 80, IQR 50–80 ml, p < 0.001) and a longer surgical duration (262.5 min, IQR 220–303.25 min vs. 232, IQR 220–255 min, p < 0.001) in the CML group than in the OG group. The incidence of postoperative complications (19.8% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.591) and postoperative hospital stay (8, IQR 7–9 days vs. 8, IQR 7–9 days, p = 0.452) were comparable between the CML and OG groups. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer surgery is technically demanding. Clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area can attain similar effects as traditional open surgery and without an increase in postoperative adverse events. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-08070-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-10-08 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7886740/ /pubmed/33030588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08070-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Dynamic Manuscript Yang, Hua Zhang, Wei-Han Liu, Kai Dan, Yu-Qing Chen, Xin-Zu Yang, Kun Chen, Zhi-Xin Chen, Jia-Ping Zhou, Zong-Guang Hu, Jian-Kun Application of clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area, a propensity score matching study and comparison with open gastrectomy |
title | Application of clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area, a propensity score matching study and comparison with open gastrectomy |
title_full | Application of clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area, a propensity score matching study and comparison with open gastrectomy |
title_fullStr | Application of clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area, a propensity score matching study and comparison with open gastrectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Application of clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area, a propensity score matching study and comparison with open gastrectomy |
title_short | Application of clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area, a propensity score matching study and comparison with open gastrectomy |
title_sort | application of clockwise modularized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic area, a propensity score matching study and comparison with open gastrectomy |
topic | Dynamic Manuscript |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7886740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33030588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08070-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yanghua applicationofclockwisemodularizedlaparoscopiclymphadenectomyinthesuprapancreaticareaapropensityscorematchingstudyandcomparisonwithopengastrectomy AT zhangweihan applicationofclockwisemodularizedlaparoscopiclymphadenectomyinthesuprapancreaticareaapropensityscorematchingstudyandcomparisonwithopengastrectomy AT liukai applicationofclockwisemodularizedlaparoscopiclymphadenectomyinthesuprapancreaticareaapropensityscorematchingstudyandcomparisonwithopengastrectomy AT danyuqing applicationofclockwisemodularizedlaparoscopiclymphadenectomyinthesuprapancreaticareaapropensityscorematchingstudyandcomparisonwithopengastrectomy AT chenxinzu applicationofclockwisemodularizedlaparoscopiclymphadenectomyinthesuprapancreaticareaapropensityscorematchingstudyandcomparisonwithopengastrectomy AT yangkun applicationofclockwisemodularizedlaparoscopiclymphadenectomyinthesuprapancreaticareaapropensityscorematchingstudyandcomparisonwithopengastrectomy AT chenzhixin applicationofclockwisemodularizedlaparoscopiclymphadenectomyinthesuprapancreaticareaapropensityscorematchingstudyandcomparisonwithopengastrectomy AT chenjiaping applicationofclockwisemodularizedlaparoscopiclymphadenectomyinthesuprapancreaticareaapropensityscorematchingstudyandcomparisonwithopengastrectomy AT zhouzongguang applicationofclockwisemodularizedlaparoscopiclymphadenectomyinthesuprapancreaticareaapropensityscorematchingstudyandcomparisonwithopengastrectomy AT hujiankun applicationofclockwisemodularizedlaparoscopiclymphadenectomyinthesuprapancreaticareaapropensityscorematchingstudyandcomparisonwithopengastrectomy |