Cargando…

An integrated life cycle and water footprint assessment of nonfood crops based bioenergy production

Biomass gasification, especially distribution to power generation, is considered as a promising way to tackle global energy and environmental challenges. However, previous researches on integrated analysis of the greenhouse gases (GHG) abatement potentials associated with biomass electrification are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jun, Xiong, Fengyin, Chen, Zhuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7887239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33594173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83061-y
_version_ 1783651937790459904
author Li, Jun
Xiong, Fengyin
Chen, Zhuo
author_facet Li, Jun
Xiong, Fengyin
Chen, Zhuo
author_sort Li, Jun
collection PubMed
description Biomass gasification, especially distribution to power generation, is considered as a promising way to tackle global energy and environmental challenges. However, previous researches on integrated analysis of the greenhouse gases (GHG) abatement potentials associated with biomass electrification are sparse and few have taken the freshwater utilization into account within a coherent framework, though both energy and water scarcity are lying in the central concerns in China’s environmental policy. This study employs a Life cycle assessment (LCA) model to analyse the actual performance combined with water footprint (WF) assessment methods. The inextricable trade-offs between three representative energy-producing technologies are explored based on three categories of non-food crops (maize, sorghum and hybrid pennisetum) cultivated in marginal arable land. WF results demonstrate that the Hybrid pennisetum system has the largest impact on the water resources whereas the other two technology options exhibit the characteristics of environmental sustainability. The large variances in contribution ratio between the four sub-processes in terms of total impacts are reflected by the LCA results. The Anaerobic Digestion process is found to be the main contributor whereas the Digestate management process is shown to be able to effectively mitigate the negative environmental impacts with an absolute share. Sensitivity analysis is implemented to detect the impacts of loss ratios variation, as silage mass and methane, on final results. The methane loss has the largest influence on the Hybrid pennisetum system, followed by the Maize system. Above all, the Sorghum system demonstrates the best performance amongst the considered assessment categories. Our study builds a pilot reference for further driving large-scale project of bioenergy production and conversion. The synergy of combined WF-LCA method allows us to conduct a comprehensive assessment and to provide insights into environmental and resource management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7887239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78872392021-02-18 An integrated life cycle and water footprint assessment of nonfood crops based bioenergy production Li, Jun Xiong, Fengyin Chen, Zhuo Sci Rep Article Biomass gasification, especially distribution to power generation, is considered as a promising way to tackle global energy and environmental challenges. However, previous researches on integrated analysis of the greenhouse gases (GHG) abatement potentials associated with biomass electrification are sparse and few have taken the freshwater utilization into account within a coherent framework, though both energy and water scarcity are lying in the central concerns in China’s environmental policy. This study employs a Life cycle assessment (LCA) model to analyse the actual performance combined with water footprint (WF) assessment methods. The inextricable trade-offs between three representative energy-producing technologies are explored based on three categories of non-food crops (maize, sorghum and hybrid pennisetum) cultivated in marginal arable land. WF results demonstrate that the Hybrid pennisetum system has the largest impact on the water resources whereas the other two technology options exhibit the characteristics of environmental sustainability. The large variances in contribution ratio between the four sub-processes in terms of total impacts are reflected by the LCA results. The Anaerobic Digestion process is found to be the main contributor whereas the Digestate management process is shown to be able to effectively mitigate the negative environmental impacts with an absolute share. Sensitivity analysis is implemented to detect the impacts of loss ratios variation, as silage mass and methane, on final results. The methane loss has the largest influence on the Hybrid pennisetum system, followed by the Maize system. Above all, the Sorghum system demonstrates the best performance amongst the considered assessment categories. Our study builds a pilot reference for further driving large-scale project of bioenergy production and conversion. The synergy of combined WF-LCA method allows us to conduct a comprehensive assessment and to provide insights into environmental and resource management. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7887239/ /pubmed/33594173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83061-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Li, Jun
Xiong, Fengyin
Chen, Zhuo
An integrated life cycle and water footprint assessment of nonfood crops based bioenergy production
title An integrated life cycle and water footprint assessment of nonfood crops based bioenergy production
title_full An integrated life cycle and water footprint assessment of nonfood crops based bioenergy production
title_fullStr An integrated life cycle and water footprint assessment of nonfood crops based bioenergy production
title_full_unstemmed An integrated life cycle and water footprint assessment of nonfood crops based bioenergy production
title_short An integrated life cycle and water footprint assessment of nonfood crops based bioenergy production
title_sort integrated life cycle and water footprint assessment of nonfood crops based bioenergy production
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7887239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33594173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83061-y
work_keys_str_mv AT lijun anintegratedlifecycleandwaterfootprintassessmentofnonfoodcropsbasedbioenergyproduction
AT xiongfengyin anintegratedlifecycleandwaterfootprintassessmentofnonfoodcropsbasedbioenergyproduction
AT chenzhuo anintegratedlifecycleandwaterfootprintassessmentofnonfoodcropsbasedbioenergyproduction
AT lijun integratedlifecycleandwaterfootprintassessmentofnonfoodcropsbasedbioenergyproduction
AT xiongfengyin integratedlifecycleandwaterfootprintassessmentofnonfoodcropsbasedbioenergyproduction
AT chenzhuo integratedlifecycleandwaterfootprintassessmentofnonfoodcropsbasedbioenergyproduction