Cargando…
An integrated life cycle and water footprint assessment of nonfood crops based bioenergy production
Biomass gasification, especially distribution to power generation, is considered as a promising way to tackle global energy and environmental challenges. However, previous researches on integrated analysis of the greenhouse gases (GHG) abatement potentials associated with biomass electrification are...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7887239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33594173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83061-y |
_version_ | 1783651937790459904 |
---|---|
author | Li, Jun Xiong, Fengyin Chen, Zhuo |
author_facet | Li, Jun Xiong, Fengyin Chen, Zhuo |
author_sort | Li, Jun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biomass gasification, especially distribution to power generation, is considered as a promising way to tackle global energy and environmental challenges. However, previous researches on integrated analysis of the greenhouse gases (GHG) abatement potentials associated with biomass electrification are sparse and few have taken the freshwater utilization into account within a coherent framework, though both energy and water scarcity are lying in the central concerns in China’s environmental policy. This study employs a Life cycle assessment (LCA) model to analyse the actual performance combined with water footprint (WF) assessment methods. The inextricable trade-offs between three representative energy-producing technologies are explored based on three categories of non-food crops (maize, sorghum and hybrid pennisetum) cultivated in marginal arable land. WF results demonstrate that the Hybrid pennisetum system has the largest impact on the water resources whereas the other two technology options exhibit the characteristics of environmental sustainability. The large variances in contribution ratio between the four sub-processes in terms of total impacts are reflected by the LCA results. The Anaerobic Digestion process is found to be the main contributor whereas the Digestate management process is shown to be able to effectively mitigate the negative environmental impacts with an absolute share. Sensitivity analysis is implemented to detect the impacts of loss ratios variation, as silage mass and methane, on final results. The methane loss has the largest influence on the Hybrid pennisetum system, followed by the Maize system. Above all, the Sorghum system demonstrates the best performance amongst the considered assessment categories. Our study builds a pilot reference for further driving large-scale project of bioenergy production and conversion. The synergy of combined WF-LCA method allows us to conduct a comprehensive assessment and to provide insights into environmental and resource management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7887239 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78872392021-02-18 An integrated life cycle and water footprint assessment of nonfood crops based bioenergy production Li, Jun Xiong, Fengyin Chen, Zhuo Sci Rep Article Biomass gasification, especially distribution to power generation, is considered as a promising way to tackle global energy and environmental challenges. However, previous researches on integrated analysis of the greenhouse gases (GHG) abatement potentials associated with biomass electrification are sparse and few have taken the freshwater utilization into account within a coherent framework, though both energy and water scarcity are lying in the central concerns in China’s environmental policy. This study employs a Life cycle assessment (LCA) model to analyse the actual performance combined with water footprint (WF) assessment methods. The inextricable trade-offs between three representative energy-producing technologies are explored based on three categories of non-food crops (maize, sorghum and hybrid pennisetum) cultivated in marginal arable land. WF results demonstrate that the Hybrid pennisetum system has the largest impact on the water resources whereas the other two technology options exhibit the characteristics of environmental sustainability. The large variances in contribution ratio between the four sub-processes in terms of total impacts are reflected by the LCA results. The Anaerobic Digestion process is found to be the main contributor whereas the Digestate management process is shown to be able to effectively mitigate the negative environmental impacts with an absolute share. Sensitivity analysis is implemented to detect the impacts of loss ratios variation, as silage mass and methane, on final results. The methane loss has the largest influence on the Hybrid pennisetum system, followed by the Maize system. Above all, the Sorghum system demonstrates the best performance amongst the considered assessment categories. Our study builds a pilot reference for further driving large-scale project of bioenergy production and conversion. The synergy of combined WF-LCA method allows us to conduct a comprehensive assessment and to provide insights into environmental and resource management. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7887239/ /pubmed/33594173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83061-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Li, Jun Xiong, Fengyin Chen, Zhuo An integrated life cycle and water footprint assessment of nonfood crops based bioenergy production |
title | An integrated life cycle and water footprint assessment of nonfood crops based bioenergy production |
title_full | An integrated life cycle and water footprint assessment of nonfood crops based bioenergy production |
title_fullStr | An integrated life cycle and water footprint assessment of nonfood crops based bioenergy production |
title_full_unstemmed | An integrated life cycle and water footprint assessment of nonfood crops based bioenergy production |
title_short | An integrated life cycle and water footprint assessment of nonfood crops based bioenergy production |
title_sort | integrated life cycle and water footprint assessment of nonfood crops based bioenergy production |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7887239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33594173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83061-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lijun anintegratedlifecycleandwaterfootprintassessmentofnonfoodcropsbasedbioenergyproduction AT xiongfengyin anintegratedlifecycleandwaterfootprintassessmentofnonfoodcropsbasedbioenergyproduction AT chenzhuo anintegratedlifecycleandwaterfootprintassessmentofnonfoodcropsbasedbioenergyproduction AT lijun integratedlifecycleandwaterfootprintassessmentofnonfoodcropsbasedbioenergyproduction AT xiongfengyin integratedlifecycleandwaterfootprintassessmentofnonfoodcropsbasedbioenergyproduction AT chenzhuo integratedlifecycleandwaterfootprintassessmentofnonfoodcropsbasedbioenergyproduction |