Cargando…
The Cancer Rehabilitation Medicine Metrics Consortium: A Path to Enhanced, Multi-Site Outcome Assessment to Enhance Care and Demonstrate Value
PURPOSE: A primary objective stated at the Cancer Rehabilitation Symposium at the National Institutes of Health was to improve outcome measurement. The purpose of this project was for the Cancer Rehabilitation Medicine Metrics Consortium (CRMMC) to develop an assessment tool to evaluate function in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7887295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33614506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.625700 |
_version_ | 1783651950940651520 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Sean R. Vargo, Mary Zucker, David S. Henderson, Maryanne Shahpar, Samman Wisotzky, Eric M. Custodio, Christian Basford, Jeffrey Jay, Gina Gerber, Lynn Cheville, Andrea |
author_facet | Smith, Sean R. Vargo, Mary Zucker, David S. Henderson, Maryanne Shahpar, Samman Wisotzky, Eric M. Custodio, Christian Basford, Jeffrey Jay, Gina Gerber, Lynn Cheville, Andrea |
author_sort | Smith, Sean R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: A primary objective stated at the Cancer Rehabilitation Symposium at the National Institutes of Health was to improve outcome measurement. The purpose of this project was for the Cancer Rehabilitation Medicine Metrics Consortium (CRMMC) to develop an assessment tool to evaluate function in cancer patients via a data-driven and methodologically sound process. There is no agreed-upon measure of physical and cognitive function for cancer patients, making it difficult to demonstrate the value of rehabilitation interventions. Cancer patients are a particularly challenging population, with many tumor- and treatment-related variables impacting function. METHODS: Investigators from nine different cancer rehabilitation programs participated in a modified-Delphi process to delineate necessary aspects of an ideal patient assessment tool, including instrument type, domains evaluated, applicability across a range of patient traits, clinical feasibility, and item response characteristics. This involved numerous meetings, data review, and analysis of items involved in patient assessment. RESULTS: The CRMMC developed a 21-item patient-reported outcome measure based on item response theory. The process by which the short form was developed was documented and provides a framework for other clinicians to follow. CONCLUSION: This document provides a framework for rehabilitation providers to follow when developing an assessment tool. This process is described in a stepwise fashion for reproducibility even in different, non-cancer populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7887295 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78872952021-02-18 The Cancer Rehabilitation Medicine Metrics Consortium: A Path to Enhanced, Multi-Site Outcome Assessment to Enhance Care and Demonstrate Value Smith, Sean R. Vargo, Mary Zucker, David S. Henderson, Maryanne Shahpar, Samman Wisotzky, Eric M. Custodio, Christian Basford, Jeffrey Jay, Gina Gerber, Lynn Cheville, Andrea Front Oncol Oncology PURPOSE: A primary objective stated at the Cancer Rehabilitation Symposium at the National Institutes of Health was to improve outcome measurement. The purpose of this project was for the Cancer Rehabilitation Medicine Metrics Consortium (CRMMC) to develop an assessment tool to evaluate function in cancer patients via a data-driven and methodologically sound process. There is no agreed-upon measure of physical and cognitive function for cancer patients, making it difficult to demonstrate the value of rehabilitation interventions. Cancer patients are a particularly challenging population, with many tumor- and treatment-related variables impacting function. METHODS: Investigators from nine different cancer rehabilitation programs participated in a modified-Delphi process to delineate necessary aspects of an ideal patient assessment tool, including instrument type, domains evaluated, applicability across a range of patient traits, clinical feasibility, and item response characteristics. This involved numerous meetings, data review, and analysis of items involved in patient assessment. RESULTS: The CRMMC developed a 21-item patient-reported outcome measure based on item response theory. The process by which the short form was developed was documented and provides a framework for other clinicians to follow. CONCLUSION: This document provides a framework for rehabilitation providers to follow when developing an assessment tool. This process is described in a stepwise fashion for reproducibility even in different, non-cancer populations. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7887295/ /pubmed/33614506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.625700 Text en Copyright © 2021 Smith, Vargo, Zucker, Henderson, Shahpar, Wisotzky, Custodio, Basford, Jay, Gerber and Cheville http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Smith, Sean R. Vargo, Mary Zucker, David S. Henderson, Maryanne Shahpar, Samman Wisotzky, Eric M. Custodio, Christian Basford, Jeffrey Jay, Gina Gerber, Lynn Cheville, Andrea The Cancer Rehabilitation Medicine Metrics Consortium: A Path to Enhanced, Multi-Site Outcome Assessment to Enhance Care and Demonstrate Value |
title | The Cancer Rehabilitation Medicine Metrics Consortium: A Path to Enhanced, Multi-Site Outcome Assessment to Enhance Care and Demonstrate Value |
title_full | The Cancer Rehabilitation Medicine Metrics Consortium: A Path to Enhanced, Multi-Site Outcome Assessment to Enhance Care and Demonstrate Value |
title_fullStr | The Cancer Rehabilitation Medicine Metrics Consortium: A Path to Enhanced, Multi-Site Outcome Assessment to Enhance Care and Demonstrate Value |
title_full_unstemmed | The Cancer Rehabilitation Medicine Metrics Consortium: A Path to Enhanced, Multi-Site Outcome Assessment to Enhance Care and Demonstrate Value |
title_short | The Cancer Rehabilitation Medicine Metrics Consortium: A Path to Enhanced, Multi-Site Outcome Assessment to Enhance Care and Demonstrate Value |
title_sort | cancer rehabilitation medicine metrics consortium: a path to enhanced, multi-site outcome assessment to enhance care and demonstrate value |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7887295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33614506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.625700 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithseanr thecancerrehabilitationmedicinemetricsconsortiumapathtoenhancedmultisiteoutcomeassessmenttoenhancecareanddemonstratevalue AT vargomary thecancerrehabilitationmedicinemetricsconsortiumapathtoenhancedmultisiteoutcomeassessmenttoenhancecareanddemonstratevalue AT zuckerdavids thecancerrehabilitationmedicinemetricsconsortiumapathtoenhancedmultisiteoutcomeassessmenttoenhancecareanddemonstratevalue AT hendersonmaryanne thecancerrehabilitationmedicinemetricsconsortiumapathtoenhancedmultisiteoutcomeassessmenttoenhancecareanddemonstratevalue AT shahparsamman thecancerrehabilitationmedicinemetricsconsortiumapathtoenhancedmultisiteoutcomeassessmenttoenhancecareanddemonstratevalue AT wisotzkyericm thecancerrehabilitationmedicinemetricsconsortiumapathtoenhancedmultisiteoutcomeassessmenttoenhancecareanddemonstratevalue AT custodiochristian thecancerrehabilitationmedicinemetricsconsortiumapathtoenhancedmultisiteoutcomeassessmenttoenhancecareanddemonstratevalue AT basfordjeffrey thecancerrehabilitationmedicinemetricsconsortiumapathtoenhancedmultisiteoutcomeassessmenttoenhancecareanddemonstratevalue AT jaygina thecancerrehabilitationmedicinemetricsconsortiumapathtoenhancedmultisiteoutcomeassessmenttoenhancecareanddemonstratevalue AT gerberlynn thecancerrehabilitationmedicinemetricsconsortiumapathtoenhancedmultisiteoutcomeassessmenttoenhancecareanddemonstratevalue AT chevilleandrea thecancerrehabilitationmedicinemetricsconsortiumapathtoenhancedmultisiteoutcomeassessmenttoenhancecareanddemonstratevalue AT smithseanr cancerrehabilitationmedicinemetricsconsortiumapathtoenhancedmultisiteoutcomeassessmenttoenhancecareanddemonstratevalue AT vargomary cancerrehabilitationmedicinemetricsconsortiumapathtoenhancedmultisiteoutcomeassessmenttoenhancecareanddemonstratevalue AT zuckerdavids cancerrehabilitationmedicinemetricsconsortiumapathtoenhancedmultisiteoutcomeassessmenttoenhancecareanddemonstratevalue AT hendersonmaryanne cancerrehabilitationmedicinemetricsconsortiumapathtoenhancedmultisiteoutcomeassessmenttoenhancecareanddemonstratevalue AT shahparsamman cancerrehabilitationmedicinemetricsconsortiumapathtoenhancedmultisiteoutcomeassessmenttoenhancecareanddemonstratevalue AT wisotzkyericm cancerrehabilitationmedicinemetricsconsortiumapathtoenhancedmultisiteoutcomeassessmenttoenhancecareanddemonstratevalue AT custodiochristian cancerrehabilitationmedicinemetricsconsortiumapathtoenhancedmultisiteoutcomeassessmenttoenhancecareanddemonstratevalue AT basfordjeffrey cancerrehabilitationmedicinemetricsconsortiumapathtoenhancedmultisiteoutcomeassessmenttoenhancecareanddemonstratevalue AT jaygina cancerrehabilitationmedicinemetricsconsortiumapathtoenhancedmultisiteoutcomeassessmenttoenhancecareanddemonstratevalue AT gerberlynn cancerrehabilitationmedicinemetricsconsortiumapathtoenhancedmultisiteoutcomeassessmenttoenhancecareanddemonstratevalue AT chevilleandrea cancerrehabilitationmedicinemetricsconsortiumapathtoenhancedmultisiteoutcomeassessmenttoenhancecareanddemonstratevalue |