Cargando…
Influence of injection technique, drug formulation and tumor microenvironment on intratumoral immunotherapy delivery and efficacy
BACKGROUND: Intratumoral delivery of immunotherapeutics represents a compelling solution to directly address local barriers to tumor immunity. However, we have previously shown that off-target delivery is a substantial problem during intratumoral injections; this can lead to diminished drug efficacy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7887346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33589526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001800 |
_version_ | 1783651962477084672 |
---|---|
author | Muñoz, Nina M. Williams, Malea Dixon, Katherine Dupuis, Crystal McWatters, Amanda Avritscher, Rony Manrique, Soraya Zorro McHugh, Kevin Murthy, Ravi Tam, Alda Naing, Aung Patel, Sapna P. Leach, David Hartgerink, Jeffrey D. Young, Simon Prakash, Punit Hwu, Patrick Sheth, Rahul A. |
author_facet | Muñoz, Nina M. Williams, Malea Dixon, Katherine Dupuis, Crystal McWatters, Amanda Avritscher, Rony Manrique, Soraya Zorro McHugh, Kevin Murthy, Ravi Tam, Alda Naing, Aung Patel, Sapna P. Leach, David Hartgerink, Jeffrey D. Young, Simon Prakash, Punit Hwu, Patrick Sheth, Rahul A. |
author_sort | Muñoz, Nina M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Intratumoral delivery of immunotherapeutics represents a compelling solution to directly address local barriers to tumor immunity. However, we have previously shown that off-target delivery is a substantial problem during intratumoral injections; this can lead to diminished drug efficacy and systemic toxicities. We have identified three variables that influence intratumoral drug delivery: injection technique, drug formulation and tumor microenvironment. The purpose of this study was to characterize the impact of modifications in each variable on intratumoral drug delivery and immunotherapy efficacy. METHODS: Intratumoral injections were performed in a hybrid image-guided intervention suite with ultrasound, fluoroscopy and CT scanning capabilities in both rat and mouse syngeneic tumor models. Intratumoral drug distribution was quantified by CT volumetric imaging. The influence of varying needle design and hydrogel-based drug delivery on the immune response to a stimulator of interferon genes (STING) agonist was evaluated using flow cytometry and single cell RNA sequencing. We also evaluated the influence of tumor stiffness on drug injection distribution. RESULTS: Variations in needle design, specifically with the use of a multiside hole needle, led to approximately threefold improvements in intratumoral drug deposition relative to conventional end-hole needles. Likewise, delivery of a STING agonist through a multiside hole needle led to significantly increased expression of type I interferon-associated genes and ‘inflammatory’ dendritic cell gene signatures relative to end-hole STING agonist delivery. A multidomain peptide-based hydrogel embedded with a STING agonist led to substantial improvements in intratumoral deposition; however, the hydrogel was noted to generate a strong immune response against itself within the target tumor. Evaluation of tumor stroma on intratumoral drug delivery revealed that there was a greater than twofold improvement in intratumoral distribution in soft tumors (B16 melanoma) compared with firm tumors (MC38 colorectal). CONCLUSIONS: Injection technique, drug formulation and tumor stiffness play key roles in the accurate delivery of intratumoral immunotherapeutics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7887346 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78873462021-03-03 Influence of injection technique, drug formulation and tumor microenvironment on intratumoral immunotherapy delivery and efficacy Muñoz, Nina M. Williams, Malea Dixon, Katherine Dupuis, Crystal McWatters, Amanda Avritscher, Rony Manrique, Soraya Zorro McHugh, Kevin Murthy, Ravi Tam, Alda Naing, Aung Patel, Sapna P. Leach, David Hartgerink, Jeffrey D. Young, Simon Prakash, Punit Hwu, Patrick Sheth, Rahul A. J Immunother Cancer Oncolytic and Local Immunotherapy BACKGROUND: Intratumoral delivery of immunotherapeutics represents a compelling solution to directly address local barriers to tumor immunity. However, we have previously shown that off-target delivery is a substantial problem during intratumoral injections; this can lead to diminished drug efficacy and systemic toxicities. We have identified three variables that influence intratumoral drug delivery: injection technique, drug formulation and tumor microenvironment. The purpose of this study was to characterize the impact of modifications in each variable on intratumoral drug delivery and immunotherapy efficacy. METHODS: Intratumoral injections were performed in a hybrid image-guided intervention suite with ultrasound, fluoroscopy and CT scanning capabilities in both rat and mouse syngeneic tumor models. Intratumoral drug distribution was quantified by CT volumetric imaging. The influence of varying needle design and hydrogel-based drug delivery on the immune response to a stimulator of interferon genes (STING) agonist was evaluated using flow cytometry and single cell RNA sequencing. We also evaluated the influence of tumor stiffness on drug injection distribution. RESULTS: Variations in needle design, specifically with the use of a multiside hole needle, led to approximately threefold improvements in intratumoral drug deposition relative to conventional end-hole needles. Likewise, delivery of a STING agonist through a multiside hole needle led to significantly increased expression of type I interferon-associated genes and ‘inflammatory’ dendritic cell gene signatures relative to end-hole STING agonist delivery. A multidomain peptide-based hydrogel embedded with a STING agonist led to substantial improvements in intratumoral deposition; however, the hydrogel was noted to generate a strong immune response against itself within the target tumor. Evaluation of tumor stroma on intratumoral drug delivery revealed that there was a greater than twofold improvement in intratumoral distribution in soft tumors (B16 melanoma) compared with firm tumors (MC38 colorectal). CONCLUSIONS: Injection technique, drug formulation and tumor stiffness play key roles in the accurate delivery of intratumoral immunotherapeutics. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7887346/ /pubmed/33589526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001800 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Oncolytic and Local Immunotherapy Muñoz, Nina M. Williams, Malea Dixon, Katherine Dupuis, Crystal McWatters, Amanda Avritscher, Rony Manrique, Soraya Zorro McHugh, Kevin Murthy, Ravi Tam, Alda Naing, Aung Patel, Sapna P. Leach, David Hartgerink, Jeffrey D. Young, Simon Prakash, Punit Hwu, Patrick Sheth, Rahul A. Influence of injection technique, drug formulation and tumor microenvironment on intratumoral immunotherapy delivery and efficacy |
title | Influence of injection technique, drug formulation and tumor microenvironment on intratumoral immunotherapy delivery and efficacy |
title_full | Influence of injection technique, drug formulation and tumor microenvironment on intratumoral immunotherapy delivery and efficacy |
title_fullStr | Influence of injection technique, drug formulation and tumor microenvironment on intratumoral immunotherapy delivery and efficacy |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of injection technique, drug formulation and tumor microenvironment on intratumoral immunotherapy delivery and efficacy |
title_short | Influence of injection technique, drug formulation and tumor microenvironment on intratumoral immunotherapy delivery and efficacy |
title_sort | influence of injection technique, drug formulation and tumor microenvironment on intratumoral immunotherapy delivery and efficacy |
topic | Oncolytic and Local Immunotherapy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7887346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33589526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001800 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT munozninam influenceofinjectiontechniquedrugformulationandtumormicroenvironmentonintratumoralimmunotherapydeliveryandefficacy AT williamsmalea influenceofinjectiontechniquedrugformulationandtumormicroenvironmentonintratumoralimmunotherapydeliveryandefficacy AT dixonkatherine influenceofinjectiontechniquedrugformulationandtumormicroenvironmentonintratumoralimmunotherapydeliveryandefficacy AT dupuiscrystal influenceofinjectiontechniquedrugformulationandtumormicroenvironmentonintratumoralimmunotherapydeliveryandefficacy AT mcwattersamanda influenceofinjectiontechniquedrugformulationandtumormicroenvironmentonintratumoralimmunotherapydeliveryandefficacy AT avritscherrony influenceofinjectiontechniquedrugformulationandtumormicroenvironmentonintratumoralimmunotherapydeliveryandefficacy AT manriquesorayazorro influenceofinjectiontechniquedrugformulationandtumormicroenvironmentonintratumoralimmunotherapydeliveryandefficacy AT mchughkevin influenceofinjectiontechniquedrugformulationandtumormicroenvironmentonintratumoralimmunotherapydeliveryandefficacy AT murthyravi influenceofinjectiontechniquedrugformulationandtumormicroenvironmentonintratumoralimmunotherapydeliveryandefficacy AT tamalda influenceofinjectiontechniquedrugformulationandtumormicroenvironmentonintratumoralimmunotherapydeliveryandefficacy AT naingaung influenceofinjectiontechniquedrugformulationandtumormicroenvironmentonintratumoralimmunotherapydeliveryandefficacy AT patelsapnap influenceofinjectiontechniquedrugformulationandtumormicroenvironmentonintratumoralimmunotherapydeliveryandefficacy AT leachdavid influenceofinjectiontechniquedrugformulationandtumormicroenvironmentonintratumoralimmunotherapydeliveryandefficacy AT hartgerinkjeffreyd influenceofinjectiontechniquedrugformulationandtumormicroenvironmentonintratumoralimmunotherapydeliveryandefficacy AT youngsimon influenceofinjectiontechniquedrugformulationandtumormicroenvironmentonintratumoralimmunotherapydeliveryandefficacy AT prakashpunit influenceofinjectiontechniquedrugformulationandtumormicroenvironmentonintratumoralimmunotherapydeliveryandefficacy AT hwupatrick influenceofinjectiontechniquedrugformulationandtumormicroenvironmentonintratumoralimmunotherapydeliveryandefficacy AT shethrahula influenceofinjectiontechniquedrugformulationandtumormicroenvironmentonintratumoralimmunotherapydeliveryandefficacy |