Cargando…
Back to simplicity: a four-marker blood cell score to quantify prognostically relevant myeloid cells in melanoma patients
BACKGROUND: Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), a cornerstone of cancer-related immunosuppression, influence response to therapy and disease outcomes in melanoma patients. Nevertheless, their quantification is far from being integrated into routine clinical practice mostly because of the comple...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7887358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33589521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001167 |
_version_ | 1783651965262102528 |
---|---|
author | Huber, Veronica Di Guardo, Lorenza Lalli, Luca Giardiello, Daniele Cova, Agata Squarcina, Paola Frati, Paola Di Giacomo, Anna Maria Pilla, Lorenzo Tazzari, Marcella Camisaschi, Chiara Arienti, Flavio Castelli, Chiara Rodolfo, Monica Beretta, Valeria Di Nicola, Massimo Maio, Michele Del Vecchio, Michele de Braud, Filippo Mariani, Luigi Rivoltini, Licia |
author_facet | Huber, Veronica Di Guardo, Lorenza Lalli, Luca Giardiello, Daniele Cova, Agata Squarcina, Paola Frati, Paola Di Giacomo, Anna Maria Pilla, Lorenzo Tazzari, Marcella Camisaschi, Chiara Arienti, Flavio Castelli, Chiara Rodolfo, Monica Beretta, Valeria Di Nicola, Massimo Maio, Michele Del Vecchio, Michele de Braud, Filippo Mariani, Luigi Rivoltini, Licia |
author_sort | Huber, Veronica |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), a cornerstone of cancer-related immunosuppression, influence response to therapy and disease outcomes in melanoma patients. Nevertheless, their quantification is far from being integrated into routine clinical practice mostly because of the complex and still evolving phenotypic signatures applied to define the cell subsets. Here, we used a multistep downsizing process to verify whether a core of few markers could be sufficient to capture the prognostic potential of myeloid cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of metastatic melanoma patients. METHODS: In baseline frozen PBMC from a total of 143 stage IIIc to IV melanoma patients, we first assessed the relevant or redundant expression of myeloid and MDSC-related markers by flow cytometry (screening set, n=23 patients). Subsequently, we applied the identified panel to the development set samples (n=59 patients undergoing first/second-line therapy) to obtain prognostic variables associated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) by machine learning adaptive index modeling. Finally, the identified score was confirmed in a validation set (n=61) and compared with standard clinical prognostic factors to assess its additive value in patient prognostication. RESULTS: This selection process led to the identification of what we defined myeloid index score (MIS), which is composed by four cell subsets (CD14(+), CD14(+)HLA-DR(neg), CD14(+)PD-L1(+) and CD15(+) cells), whose frequencies above cut-offs stratified melanoma patients according to progressively worse prognosis. Patients with a MIS=0, showing no over-threshold value of MIS subsets, had the best clinical outcome, with a median survival of >33.6 months, while in patients with MIS 1→3, OS deteriorated from 10.9 to 6.8 and 6.0 months as the MIS increased (p<0.0001, c-index=0.745). MIS clustered patients into risk groups also according to PFS (p<0.0001). The inverse correlation between MIS and survival was confirmed in the validation set, was independent of the type of therapy and was not interfered by clinical prognostic factors. MIS HR was remarkably superior to that of lactate dehydrogenase, tumor burden and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. CONCLUSION: The MIS >0 identifies melanoma patients with a more aggressive disease, thus acting as a simple blood biomarker that can help tailoring therapeutic choices in real-life oncology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7887358 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78873582021-03-03 Back to simplicity: a four-marker blood cell score to quantify prognostically relevant myeloid cells in melanoma patients Huber, Veronica Di Guardo, Lorenza Lalli, Luca Giardiello, Daniele Cova, Agata Squarcina, Paola Frati, Paola Di Giacomo, Anna Maria Pilla, Lorenzo Tazzari, Marcella Camisaschi, Chiara Arienti, Flavio Castelli, Chiara Rodolfo, Monica Beretta, Valeria Di Nicola, Massimo Maio, Michele Del Vecchio, Michele de Braud, Filippo Mariani, Luigi Rivoltini, Licia J Immunother Cancer Immunotherapy Biomarkers BACKGROUND: Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), a cornerstone of cancer-related immunosuppression, influence response to therapy and disease outcomes in melanoma patients. Nevertheless, their quantification is far from being integrated into routine clinical practice mostly because of the complex and still evolving phenotypic signatures applied to define the cell subsets. Here, we used a multistep downsizing process to verify whether a core of few markers could be sufficient to capture the prognostic potential of myeloid cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of metastatic melanoma patients. METHODS: In baseline frozen PBMC from a total of 143 stage IIIc to IV melanoma patients, we first assessed the relevant or redundant expression of myeloid and MDSC-related markers by flow cytometry (screening set, n=23 patients). Subsequently, we applied the identified panel to the development set samples (n=59 patients undergoing first/second-line therapy) to obtain prognostic variables associated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) by machine learning adaptive index modeling. Finally, the identified score was confirmed in a validation set (n=61) and compared with standard clinical prognostic factors to assess its additive value in patient prognostication. RESULTS: This selection process led to the identification of what we defined myeloid index score (MIS), which is composed by four cell subsets (CD14(+), CD14(+)HLA-DR(neg), CD14(+)PD-L1(+) and CD15(+) cells), whose frequencies above cut-offs stratified melanoma patients according to progressively worse prognosis. Patients with a MIS=0, showing no over-threshold value of MIS subsets, had the best clinical outcome, with a median survival of >33.6 months, while in patients with MIS 1→3, OS deteriorated from 10.9 to 6.8 and 6.0 months as the MIS increased (p<0.0001, c-index=0.745). MIS clustered patients into risk groups also according to PFS (p<0.0001). The inverse correlation between MIS and survival was confirmed in the validation set, was independent of the type of therapy and was not interfered by clinical prognostic factors. MIS HR was remarkably superior to that of lactate dehydrogenase, tumor burden and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. CONCLUSION: The MIS >0 identifies melanoma patients with a more aggressive disease, thus acting as a simple blood biomarker that can help tailoring therapeutic choices in real-life oncology. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7887358/ /pubmed/33589521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001167 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Immunotherapy Biomarkers Huber, Veronica Di Guardo, Lorenza Lalli, Luca Giardiello, Daniele Cova, Agata Squarcina, Paola Frati, Paola Di Giacomo, Anna Maria Pilla, Lorenzo Tazzari, Marcella Camisaschi, Chiara Arienti, Flavio Castelli, Chiara Rodolfo, Monica Beretta, Valeria Di Nicola, Massimo Maio, Michele Del Vecchio, Michele de Braud, Filippo Mariani, Luigi Rivoltini, Licia Back to simplicity: a four-marker blood cell score to quantify prognostically relevant myeloid cells in melanoma patients |
title | Back to simplicity: a four-marker blood cell score to quantify prognostically relevant myeloid cells in melanoma patients |
title_full | Back to simplicity: a four-marker blood cell score to quantify prognostically relevant myeloid cells in melanoma patients |
title_fullStr | Back to simplicity: a four-marker blood cell score to quantify prognostically relevant myeloid cells in melanoma patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Back to simplicity: a four-marker blood cell score to quantify prognostically relevant myeloid cells in melanoma patients |
title_short | Back to simplicity: a four-marker blood cell score to quantify prognostically relevant myeloid cells in melanoma patients |
title_sort | back to simplicity: a four-marker blood cell score to quantify prognostically relevant myeloid cells in melanoma patients |
topic | Immunotherapy Biomarkers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7887358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33589521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001167 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huberveronica backtosimplicityafourmarkerbloodcellscoretoquantifyprognosticallyrelevantmyeloidcellsinmelanomapatients AT diguardolorenza backtosimplicityafourmarkerbloodcellscoretoquantifyprognosticallyrelevantmyeloidcellsinmelanomapatients AT lalliluca backtosimplicityafourmarkerbloodcellscoretoquantifyprognosticallyrelevantmyeloidcellsinmelanomapatients AT giardiellodaniele backtosimplicityafourmarkerbloodcellscoretoquantifyprognosticallyrelevantmyeloidcellsinmelanomapatients AT covaagata backtosimplicityafourmarkerbloodcellscoretoquantifyprognosticallyrelevantmyeloidcellsinmelanomapatients AT squarcinapaola backtosimplicityafourmarkerbloodcellscoretoquantifyprognosticallyrelevantmyeloidcellsinmelanomapatients AT fratipaola backtosimplicityafourmarkerbloodcellscoretoquantifyprognosticallyrelevantmyeloidcellsinmelanomapatients AT digiacomoannamaria backtosimplicityafourmarkerbloodcellscoretoquantifyprognosticallyrelevantmyeloidcellsinmelanomapatients AT pillalorenzo backtosimplicityafourmarkerbloodcellscoretoquantifyprognosticallyrelevantmyeloidcellsinmelanomapatients AT tazzarimarcella backtosimplicityafourmarkerbloodcellscoretoquantifyprognosticallyrelevantmyeloidcellsinmelanomapatients AT camisaschichiara backtosimplicityafourmarkerbloodcellscoretoquantifyprognosticallyrelevantmyeloidcellsinmelanomapatients AT arientiflavio backtosimplicityafourmarkerbloodcellscoretoquantifyprognosticallyrelevantmyeloidcellsinmelanomapatients AT castellichiara backtosimplicityafourmarkerbloodcellscoretoquantifyprognosticallyrelevantmyeloidcellsinmelanomapatients AT rodolfomonica backtosimplicityafourmarkerbloodcellscoretoquantifyprognosticallyrelevantmyeloidcellsinmelanomapatients AT berettavaleria backtosimplicityafourmarkerbloodcellscoretoquantifyprognosticallyrelevantmyeloidcellsinmelanomapatients AT dinicolamassimo backtosimplicityafourmarkerbloodcellscoretoquantifyprognosticallyrelevantmyeloidcellsinmelanomapatients AT maiomichele backtosimplicityafourmarkerbloodcellscoretoquantifyprognosticallyrelevantmyeloidcellsinmelanomapatients AT delvecchiomichele backtosimplicityafourmarkerbloodcellscoretoquantifyprognosticallyrelevantmyeloidcellsinmelanomapatients AT debraudfilippo backtosimplicityafourmarkerbloodcellscoretoquantifyprognosticallyrelevantmyeloidcellsinmelanomapatients AT marianiluigi backtosimplicityafourmarkerbloodcellscoretoquantifyprognosticallyrelevantmyeloidcellsinmelanomapatients AT rivoltinilicia backtosimplicityafourmarkerbloodcellscoretoquantifyprognosticallyrelevantmyeloidcellsinmelanomapatients |