Cargando…

Suicide capacity within the ideation-to-action framework: a scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION: A core facilitator of the transition from suicidal thoughts to suicide attempt is the individual’s capacity for suicide. Suicide capacity is a theoretically universal concept adaptable for specific groups that is hypothesised to comprise three contributing factors: acquired capability,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bayliss, Luke T, Lamont-Mills, Andrea, du Plessis, Carol, Morgan, Talia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7887362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33589461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043649
_version_ 1783651966190092288
author Bayliss, Luke T
Lamont-Mills, Andrea
du Plessis, Carol
Morgan, Talia
author_facet Bayliss, Luke T
Lamont-Mills, Andrea
du Plessis, Carol
Morgan, Talia
author_sort Bayliss, Luke T
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A core facilitator of the transition from suicidal thoughts to suicide attempt is the individual’s capacity for suicide. Suicide capacity is a theoretically universal concept adaptable for specific groups that is hypothesised to comprise three contributing factors: acquired capability, for example, previous self-harm; dispositional, such as genetic influences and practical, knowledge of and access to lethal means. Given that suicide capacity as a concept is continuing to develop, a review and synthesis of the current literature is timely to ensure future research and development of suicide prevention strategies are based on evidential knowledge. The aim of this review is to map the available evidence to provide an overview of factors that contribute to an adult’s capacity for suicide. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review will encompass five stages. Studies will be identified through broad search strings applied to 11 academic databases: Academic Search Ultimate, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, Psychology & Behavioural Sciences, & Sociology Source Ultimate via EBSCOHost Megafile Ultimate; PubMed; Science Direct; Wiley Online; Taylor & Francis and ProQuest dissertations and theses. Grey literature databases and key suicide organisations will also be searched for relevant literature. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts then review full texts to identify articles meeting inclusion criteria. Articles will be assessed for eligibility based on suicide attempt history, primary research study design, language and publication date. Data from eligible full texts will be extracted using a predesigned template for analysis. The synthesisation method will be textual narrative synthesis with an incorporated quality appraisal checklist tool. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this scoping review as no human participants are involved. Study findings will be shared with key suicide organisations, through peer-reviewed publications, and conference presentations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7887362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78873622021-03-03 Suicide capacity within the ideation-to-action framework: a scoping review protocol Bayliss, Luke T Lamont-Mills, Andrea du Plessis, Carol Morgan, Talia BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: A core facilitator of the transition from suicidal thoughts to suicide attempt is the individual’s capacity for suicide. Suicide capacity is a theoretically universal concept adaptable for specific groups that is hypothesised to comprise three contributing factors: acquired capability, for example, previous self-harm; dispositional, such as genetic influences and practical, knowledge of and access to lethal means. Given that suicide capacity as a concept is continuing to develop, a review and synthesis of the current literature is timely to ensure future research and development of suicide prevention strategies are based on evidential knowledge. The aim of this review is to map the available evidence to provide an overview of factors that contribute to an adult’s capacity for suicide. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review will encompass five stages. Studies will be identified through broad search strings applied to 11 academic databases: Academic Search Ultimate, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, Psychology & Behavioural Sciences, & Sociology Source Ultimate via EBSCOHost Megafile Ultimate; PubMed; Science Direct; Wiley Online; Taylor & Francis and ProQuest dissertations and theses. Grey literature databases and key suicide organisations will also be searched for relevant literature. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts then review full texts to identify articles meeting inclusion criteria. Articles will be assessed for eligibility based on suicide attempt history, primary research study design, language and publication date. Data from eligible full texts will be extracted using a predesigned template for analysis. The synthesisation method will be textual narrative synthesis with an incorporated quality appraisal checklist tool. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this scoping review as no human participants are involved. Study findings will be shared with key suicide organisations, through peer-reviewed publications, and conference presentations. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7887362/ /pubmed/33589461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043649 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Mental Health
Bayliss, Luke T
Lamont-Mills, Andrea
du Plessis, Carol
Morgan, Talia
Suicide capacity within the ideation-to-action framework: a scoping review protocol
title Suicide capacity within the ideation-to-action framework: a scoping review protocol
title_full Suicide capacity within the ideation-to-action framework: a scoping review protocol
title_fullStr Suicide capacity within the ideation-to-action framework: a scoping review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Suicide capacity within the ideation-to-action framework: a scoping review protocol
title_short Suicide capacity within the ideation-to-action framework: a scoping review protocol
title_sort suicide capacity within the ideation-to-action framework: a scoping review protocol
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7887362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33589461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043649
work_keys_str_mv AT baylissluket suicidecapacitywithintheideationtoactionframeworkascopingreviewprotocol
AT lamontmillsandrea suicidecapacitywithintheideationtoactionframeworkascopingreviewprotocol
AT duplessiscarol suicidecapacitywithintheideationtoactionframeworkascopingreviewprotocol
AT morgantalia suicidecapacitywithintheideationtoactionframeworkascopingreviewprotocol