Cargando…

Evaluation of an Adaptive Dynamic Compensation System in Cochlear Implant Listeners

Cochlear implant (CI) sound processing typically uses a front-end automatic gain control (AGC), reducing the acoustic dynamic range (DR) to control the output level and protect the signal processing against large amplitude changes. It can also introduce distortions into the signal and does not allow...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Langner, Florian, Büchner, Andreas, Nogueira, Waldo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7887680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33356927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216520970349
_version_ 1783652032731676672
author Langner, Florian
Büchner, Andreas
Nogueira, Waldo
author_facet Langner, Florian
Büchner, Andreas
Nogueira, Waldo
author_sort Langner, Florian
collection PubMed
description Cochlear implant (CI) sound processing typically uses a front-end automatic gain control (AGC), reducing the acoustic dynamic range (DR) to control the output level and protect the signal processing against large amplitude changes. It can also introduce distortions into the signal and does not allow a direct mapping between acoustic input and electric output. For speech in noise, a reduction in DR can result in lower speech intelligibility due to compressed modulations of speech. This study proposes to implement a CI signal processing scheme consisting of a full acoustic DR with adaptive properties to improve the signal-to-noise ratio and overall speech intelligibility. Measurements based on the Short-Time Objective Intelligibility measure and an electrodogram analysis, as well as behavioral tests in up to 10 CI users, were used to compare performance with a single-channel, dual-loop, front-end AGC and with an adaptive back-end multiband dynamic compensation system (Voice Guard [VG]). Speech intelligibility in quiet and at a +10 dB signal-to-noise ratio was assessed with the Hochmair–Schulz–Moser sentence test. A logatome discrimination task with different consonants was performed in quiet. Speech intelligibility was significantly higher in quiet for VG than for AGC, but intelligibility was similar in noise. Participants obtained significantly better scores with VG than AGC in the logatome discrimination task. The objective measurements predicted significantly better performance estimates for VG. Overall, a dynamic compensation system can outperform a single-stage compression (AGC + linear compression) for speech perception in quiet.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7887680
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78876802021-02-24 Evaluation of an Adaptive Dynamic Compensation System in Cochlear Implant Listeners Langner, Florian Büchner, Andreas Nogueira, Waldo Trends Hear Original Article Cochlear implant (CI) sound processing typically uses a front-end automatic gain control (AGC), reducing the acoustic dynamic range (DR) to control the output level and protect the signal processing against large amplitude changes. It can also introduce distortions into the signal and does not allow a direct mapping between acoustic input and electric output. For speech in noise, a reduction in DR can result in lower speech intelligibility due to compressed modulations of speech. This study proposes to implement a CI signal processing scheme consisting of a full acoustic DR with adaptive properties to improve the signal-to-noise ratio and overall speech intelligibility. Measurements based on the Short-Time Objective Intelligibility measure and an electrodogram analysis, as well as behavioral tests in up to 10 CI users, were used to compare performance with a single-channel, dual-loop, front-end AGC and with an adaptive back-end multiband dynamic compensation system (Voice Guard [VG]). Speech intelligibility in quiet and at a +10 dB signal-to-noise ratio was assessed with the Hochmair–Schulz–Moser sentence test. A logatome discrimination task with different consonants was performed in quiet. Speech intelligibility was significantly higher in quiet for VG than for AGC, but intelligibility was similar in noise. Participants obtained significantly better scores with VG than AGC in the logatome discrimination task. The objective measurements predicted significantly better performance estimates for VG. Overall, a dynamic compensation system can outperform a single-stage compression (AGC + linear compression) for speech perception in quiet. SAGE Publications 2020-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7887680/ /pubmed/33356927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216520970349 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Creative Commons CC-BY: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Langner, Florian
Büchner, Andreas
Nogueira, Waldo
Evaluation of an Adaptive Dynamic Compensation System in Cochlear Implant Listeners
title Evaluation of an Adaptive Dynamic Compensation System in Cochlear Implant Listeners
title_full Evaluation of an Adaptive Dynamic Compensation System in Cochlear Implant Listeners
title_fullStr Evaluation of an Adaptive Dynamic Compensation System in Cochlear Implant Listeners
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of an Adaptive Dynamic Compensation System in Cochlear Implant Listeners
title_short Evaluation of an Adaptive Dynamic Compensation System in Cochlear Implant Listeners
title_sort evaluation of an adaptive dynamic compensation system in cochlear implant listeners
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7887680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33356927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216520970349
work_keys_str_mv AT langnerflorian evaluationofanadaptivedynamiccompensationsystemincochlearimplantlisteners
AT buchnerandreas evaluationofanadaptivedynamiccompensationsystemincochlearimplantlisteners
AT nogueirawaldo evaluationofanadaptivedynamiccompensationsystemincochlearimplantlisteners