Cargando…
A prospective cohort study evaluating screening and assessment of six modifiable risk factors in HPB cancer patients and compliance to recommended prehabilitation interventions
INTRODUCTION: Despite improvements in perioperative care, major abdominal surgery continues to be associated with significant perioperative morbidity. Accurate preoperative risk stratification and optimisation (prehabilitation) are necessary to reduce perioperative morbidity. This study evaluated th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7887817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33593437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-020-00175-z |
_version_ | 1783652052491042816 |
---|---|
author | van Wijk, Laura van der Snee, Lizzel Buis, Carlijn I. Hentzen, Judith E. K. R. Haveman, Marjolein E. Klaase, Joost M. |
author_facet | van Wijk, Laura van der Snee, Lizzel Buis, Carlijn I. Hentzen, Judith E. K. R. Haveman, Marjolein E. Klaase, Joost M. |
author_sort | van Wijk, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Despite improvements in perioperative care, major abdominal surgery continues to be associated with significant perioperative morbidity. Accurate preoperative risk stratification and optimisation (prehabilitation) are necessary to reduce perioperative morbidity. This study evaluated the screening and assessment of modifiable risk factors amendable for prehabilitation interventions and measured the patient compliance rate with recommended interventions. METHOD: Between May 2019 and January 2020, patients referred to our hospital for HPB surgery were screened and assessed on six modifiable preoperative risk factors. The risk factors and screening tools used, with cutoff values, included (i) low physical fitness (a 6-min walk test < 82% of patient’s calculated norm and/or patient’s activity level not meeting the global recommendations on physical activity for health). Patients who were unfit based on the screening were assessed with a cardiopulmonary exercise test (anaerobic threshold ≤ 11 mL/kg/min); (ii) malnutrition (patient-generated subjective global assessment ≥ 4); (iii) iron-deficiency anaemia (haemoglobin < 12 g/dL for women, < 13 g/dL for men and transferrin saturation ≤ 20%); (iv) frailty (Groningen frailty indicator/Robinson frailty score ≥ 4); (v) substance use (smoking and alcohol use of > 5 units per week) and (vi) low psychological resilience (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ≥ 8). Patients had a consultation with the surgeon on the same day as their screening. High-risk patients were referred for necessary interventions. RESULTS: One hundred consecutive patients were screened at our prehabilitation outpatient clinic. The prevalence of high-risk patients per risk factor was 64% for low physical fitness, 42% for malnutrition, 32% for anaemia (in 47% due to iron deficiency), 22% for frailty, 12% for smoking, 18% for alcohol use and 21% for low psychological resilience. Of the 77 patients who were eventually scheduled for surgery, 53 (68.8%) needed at least one intervention, of whom 28 (52.8%) complied with 100% of the necessary interventions. The median (IQR) number of interventions needed in the 77 patients was 1.0 (0–2). CONCLUSION: It is feasible to screen and assess all patients referred for HPB cancer surgery for six modifiable risk factors. Most of the patients had at least one risk factor that could be optimised. However, compliance with the suggested interventions remains challenging. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13741-020-00175-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7887817 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78878172021-02-22 A prospective cohort study evaluating screening and assessment of six modifiable risk factors in HPB cancer patients and compliance to recommended prehabilitation interventions van Wijk, Laura van der Snee, Lizzel Buis, Carlijn I. Hentzen, Judith E. K. R. Haveman, Marjolein E. Klaase, Joost M. Perioper Med (Lond) Research INTRODUCTION: Despite improvements in perioperative care, major abdominal surgery continues to be associated with significant perioperative morbidity. Accurate preoperative risk stratification and optimisation (prehabilitation) are necessary to reduce perioperative morbidity. This study evaluated the screening and assessment of modifiable risk factors amendable for prehabilitation interventions and measured the patient compliance rate with recommended interventions. METHOD: Between May 2019 and January 2020, patients referred to our hospital for HPB surgery were screened and assessed on six modifiable preoperative risk factors. The risk factors and screening tools used, with cutoff values, included (i) low physical fitness (a 6-min walk test < 82% of patient’s calculated norm and/or patient’s activity level not meeting the global recommendations on physical activity for health). Patients who were unfit based on the screening were assessed with a cardiopulmonary exercise test (anaerobic threshold ≤ 11 mL/kg/min); (ii) malnutrition (patient-generated subjective global assessment ≥ 4); (iii) iron-deficiency anaemia (haemoglobin < 12 g/dL for women, < 13 g/dL for men and transferrin saturation ≤ 20%); (iv) frailty (Groningen frailty indicator/Robinson frailty score ≥ 4); (v) substance use (smoking and alcohol use of > 5 units per week) and (vi) low psychological resilience (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ≥ 8). Patients had a consultation with the surgeon on the same day as their screening. High-risk patients were referred for necessary interventions. RESULTS: One hundred consecutive patients were screened at our prehabilitation outpatient clinic. The prevalence of high-risk patients per risk factor was 64% for low physical fitness, 42% for malnutrition, 32% for anaemia (in 47% due to iron deficiency), 22% for frailty, 12% for smoking, 18% for alcohol use and 21% for low psychological resilience. Of the 77 patients who were eventually scheduled for surgery, 53 (68.8%) needed at least one intervention, of whom 28 (52.8%) complied with 100% of the necessary interventions. The median (IQR) number of interventions needed in the 77 patients was 1.0 (0–2). CONCLUSION: It is feasible to screen and assess all patients referred for HPB cancer surgery for six modifiable risk factors. Most of the patients had at least one risk factor that could be optimised. However, compliance with the suggested interventions remains challenging. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13741-020-00175-z. BioMed Central 2021-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7887817/ /pubmed/33593437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-020-00175-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research van Wijk, Laura van der Snee, Lizzel Buis, Carlijn I. Hentzen, Judith E. K. R. Haveman, Marjolein E. Klaase, Joost M. A prospective cohort study evaluating screening and assessment of six modifiable risk factors in HPB cancer patients and compliance to recommended prehabilitation interventions |
title | A prospective cohort study evaluating screening and assessment of six modifiable risk factors in HPB cancer patients and compliance to recommended prehabilitation interventions |
title_full | A prospective cohort study evaluating screening and assessment of six modifiable risk factors in HPB cancer patients and compliance to recommended prehabilitation interventions |
title_fullStr | A prospective cohort study evaluating screening and assessment of six modifiable risk factors in HPB cancer patients and compliance to recommended prehabilitation interventions |
title_full_unstemmed | A prospective cohort study evaluating screening and assessment of six modifiable risk factors in HPB cancer patients and compliance to recommended prehabilitation interventions |
title_short | A prospective cohort study evaluating screening and assessment of six modifiable risk factors in HPB cancer patients and compliance to recommended prehabilitation interventions |
title_sort | prospective cohort study evaluating screening and assessment of six modifiable risk factors in hpb cancer patients and compliance to recommended prehabilitation interventions |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7887817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33593437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-020-00175-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanwijklaura aprospectivecohortstudyevaluatingscreeningandassessmentofsixmodifiableriskfactorsinhpbcancerpatientsandcompliancetorecommendedprehabilitationinterventions AT vandersneelizzel aprospectivecohortstudyevaluatingscreeningandassessmentofsixmodifiableriskfactorsinhpbcancerpatientsandcompliancetorecommendedprehabilitationinterventions AT buiscarlijni aprospectivecohortstudyevaluatingscreeningandassessmentofsixmodifiableriskfactorsinhpbcancerpatientsandcompliancetorecommendedprehabilitationinterventions AT hentzenjudithekr aprospectivecohortstudyevaluatingscreeningandassessmentofsixmodifiableriskfactorsinhpbcancerpatientsandcompliancetorecommendedprehabilitationinterventions AT havemanmarjoleine aprospectivecohortstudyevaluatingscreeningandassessmentofsixmodifiableriskfactorsinhpbcancerpatientsandcompliancetorecommendedprehabilitationinterventions AT klaasejoostm aprospectivecohortstudyevaluatingscreeningandassessmentofsixmodifiableriskfactorsinhpbcancerpatientsandcompliancetorecommendedprehabilitationinterventions AT vanwijklaura prospectivecohortstudyevaluatingscreeningandassessmentofsixmodifiableriskfactorsinhpbcancerpatientsandcompliancetorecommendedprehabilitationinterventions AT vandersneelizzel prospectivecohortstudyevaluatingscreeningandassessmentofsixmodifiableriskfactorsinhpbcancerpatientsandcompliancetorecommendedprehabilitationinterventions AT buiscarlijni prospectivecohortstudyevaluatingscreeningandassessmentofsixmodifiableriskfactorsinhpbcancerpatientsandcompliancetorecommendedprehabilitationinterventions AT hentzenjudithekr prospectivecohortstudyevaluatingscreeningandassessmentofsixmodifiableriskfactorsinhpbcancerpatientsandcompliancetorecommendedprehabilitationinterventions AT havemanmarjoleine prospectivecohortstudyevaluatingscreeningandassessmentofsixmodifiableriskfactorsinhpbcancerpatientsandcompliancetorecommendedprehabilitationinterventions AT klaasejoostm prospectivecohortstudyevaluatingscreeningandassessmentofsixmodifiableriskfactorsinhpbcancerpatientsandcompliancetorecommendedprehabilitationinterventions |