Cargando…
Oral feeding for infants and children receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure and high flow nasal cannula: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether introduction of oral feeding for infants and children receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) or high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) respiratory support facilitates achievement of full oral feeding without adverse...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7887825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33596866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02531-4 |
_version_ | 1783652053945417728 |
---|---|
author | Canning, Angie Clarke, Sally Thorning, Sarah Chauhan, Manbir Weir, Kelly A |
author_facet | Canning, Angie Clarke, Sally Thorning, Sarah Chauhan, Manbir Weir, Kelly A |
author_sort | Canning, Angie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether introduction of oral feeding for infants and children receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) or high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) respiratory support facilitates achievement of full oral feeding without adverse effects, compared to no oral feeding (NPO; nil per oral) on CPAP or HFNC. METHODS: A protocol was lodged with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL and AustHealth from database inception to 10th June 2020. Study population included children (preterm to < 18 years) on nCPAP or HFNC who were orally feeding. Primary outcomes included full or partial oral feeding and oropharyngeal aspiration. Secondary outcomes examined adverse events including clinical signs of aspiration, aspiration pneumonia and deterioration in respiratory status. RESULTS: The search retrieved 1684 studies following duplicate removal. Title and abstract screening identified 70 studies for full text screening and of these, 16 were included in the review for data extraction. Methods of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) included nCPAP (n = 6), nCPAP and HFNC (n = 5) and HFNC (n = 5). A metanalysis was not possible as respiratory modes and cohorts were not comparable. Eleven studies reported on adverse events. Oral feeding safety was predominantly based on retrospective data from chart entries and clinical signs, with only one study using an instrumental swallow evaluation (VFSS) to determine aspiration status. CONCLUSIONS: Findings are insufficient to conclude whether commencing oral feeding whilst on nCPAP or HFNC facilitates transition to full oral feeding without adverse effects, including oropharyngeal aspiration. Further research is required to determine the safety and efficacy of oral feeding on CPAP and HFNC for infants and children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42016039325. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7887825 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78878252021-02-22 Oral feeding for infants and children receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure and high flow nasal cannula: a systematic review Canning, Angie Clarke, Sally Thorning, Sarah Chauhan, Manbir Weir, Kelly A BMC Pediatr Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether introduction of oral feeding for infants and children receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) or high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) respiratory support facilitates achievement of full oral feeding without adverse effects, compared to no oral feeding (NPO; nil per oral) on CPAP or HFNC. METHODS: A protocol was lodged with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL and AustHealth from database inception to 10th June 2020. Study population included children (preterm to < 18 years) on nCPAP or HFNC who were orally feeding. Primary outcomes included full or partial oral feeding and oropharyngeal aspiration. Secondary outcomes examined adverse events including clinical signs of aspiration, aspiration pneumonia and deterioration in respiratory status. RESULTS: The search retrieved 1684 studies following duplicate removal. Title and abstract screening identified 70 studies for full text screening and of these, 16 were included in the review for data extraction. Methods of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) included nCPAP (n = 6), nCPAP and HFNC (n = 5) and HFNC (n = 5). A metanalysis was not possible as respiratory modes and cohorts were not comparable. Eleven studies reported on adverse events. Oral feeding safety was predominantly based on retrospective data from chart entries and clinical signs, with only one study using an instrumental swallow evaluation (VFSS) to determine aspiration status. CONCLUSIONS: Findings are insufficient to conclude whether commencing oral feeding whilst on nCPAP or HFNC facilitates transition to full oral feeding without adverse effects, including oropharyngeal aspiration. Further research is required to determine the safety and efficacy of oral feeding on CPAP and HFNC for infants and children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42016039325. BioMed Central 2021-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7887825/ /pubmed/33596866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02531-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Canning, Angie Clarke, Sally Thorning, Sarah Chauhan, Manbir Weir, Kelly A Oral feeding for infants and children receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure and high flow nasal cannula: a systematic review |
title | Oral feeding for infants and children receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure and high flow nasal cannula: a systematic review |
title_full | Oral feeding for infants and children receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure and high flow nasal cannula: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Oral feeding for infants and children receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure and high flow nasal cannula: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Oral feeding for infants and children receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure and high flow nasal cannula: a systematic review |
title_short | Oral feeding for infants and children receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure and high flow nasal cannula: a systematic review |
title_sort | oral feeding for infants and children receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure and high flow nasal cannula: a systematic review |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7887825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33596866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02531-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT canningangie oralfeedingforinfantsandchildrenreceivingnasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressureandhighflownasalcannulaasystematicreview AT clarkesally oralfeedingforinfantsandchildrenreceivingnasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressureandhighflownasalcannulaasystematicreview AT thorningsarah oralfeedingforinfantsandchildrenreceivingnasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressureandhighflownasalcannulaasystematicreview AT chauhanmanbir oralfeedingforinfantsandchildrenreceivingnasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressureandhighflownasalcannulaasystematicreview AT weirkellya oralfeedingforinfantsandchildrenreceivingnasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressureandhighflownasalcannulaasystematicreview |