Cargando…
Criminalisation under scrutiny: how constitutional courts are changing their narrative by using public health evidence in abortion cases
This article explains how the strategic use of public health evidence, showing that criminalisation of abortion does not result in lower abortion rates, is changing the way judges are confronting constitutional challenges to abortion regulations. The state may have a legitimate interest – and in som...
Autor principal: | Undurraga, Verónica |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7887990/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31533574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2019.1620552 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Belgian euthanasia law under scrutiny of the highest courts
por: De Hert, Marc, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
The impact of criminalisation on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence
por: de Londras, Fiona, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Insight Under Scrutiny in the Court of Protection: A Case Law Survey
por: Gurbai, Sándor, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Psychiatric Commitment: Sixty Years Under the Scrutiny of the European Court of Human Rights
por: Niveau, Gérard, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
How Do Courts Set Health Policy? The Case of the Colombian Constitutional Court
por: Yamin, Alicia Ely, et al.
Publicado: (2009)