Cargando…

Abortion and methods of reproductive planning: the views of Malta’s medical doctor cohort

Malta is the only EU country where abortion remains illegal in all circumstances. This study aims to assess the previously unexplored views of Malta’s medical doctors on the legality of contraception, abortion, assisted reproductive technology and surrogacy. Following ethics approval, 1578 out of a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gravino, Gilbert, Caruana-Finkel, Liza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7888034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31744424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2019.1683127
_version_ 1783652088441470976
author Gravino, Gilbert
Caruana-Finkel, Liza
author_facet Gravino, Gilbert
Caruana-Finkel, Liza
author_sort Gravino, Gilbert
collection PubMed
description Malta is the only EU country where abortion remains illegal in all circumstances. This study aims to assess the previously unexplored views of Malta’s medical doctors on the legality of contraception, abortion, assisted reproductive technology and surrogacy. Following ethics approval, 1578 out of a total of 2468 registered medical doctors in Malta were invited for an anonymous survey. The response rate was 28.8% (n = 454), guaranteeing a maximum margin of error of 4.16% assuming a 95% confidence level. Responses consisted of “Yes”, “No”, and “Not sure”. In the abortion section, “Yes” responses were specific to different gestational age limits. A majority supported all contraceptive methods being legal: morning-after pill (59.7%); intra-uterine device (85.9%); surgical sterilisation (>70%). A majority also agreed with in-vitro fertilisation being legal (93.8%). Embryo freezing and surrogacy garnered less support (39.9% and 40.5% respectively). Legalising abortion for “Woman’s life in danger” and “Non-viable fetal anomaly” was supported at least up to 12 weeks gestation by 66.8% and 63.0% respectively, and in all stages of pregnancy by 54.2% and 50.2% respectively. Support, at least up to 12 weeks gestation, was less for other circumstances: “Rape or incest” (35.3%); “Preserve a woman’s physical health” (30.0%); “Preserve a woman’s mental health” (26.8%); “Viable fetal anomaly” (24.6%); “<16 years of age” (23.8%); “Economic/social reasons” (18.9%); “Any circumstance” (14.5%). According to the surveyed respondents, there is at present a clear majority of doctors in Malta who do not agree with the total legal ban on abortion and support its legalisation in limited circumstances.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7888034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78880342021-03-30 Abortion and methods of reproductive planning: the views of Malta’s medical doctor cohort Gravino, Gilbert Caruana-Finkel, Liza Sex Reprod Health Matters Research Articles Malta is the only EU country where abortion remains illegal in all circumstances. This study aims to assess the previously unexplored views of Malta’s medical doctors on the legality of contraception, abortion, assisted reproductive technology and surrogacy. Following ethics approval, 1578 out of a total of 2468 registered medical doctors in Malta were invited for an anonymous survey. The response rate was 28.8% (n = 454), guaranteeing a maximum margin of error of 4.16% assuming a 95% confidence level. Responses consisted of “Yes”, “No”, and “Not sure”. In the abortion section, “Yes” responses were specific to different gestational age limits. A majority supported all contraceptive methods being legal: morning-after pill (59.7%); intra-uterine device (85.9%); surgical sterilisation (>70%). A majority also agreed with in-vitro fertilisation being legal (93.8%). Embryo freezing and surrogacy garnered less support (39.9% and 40.5% respectively). Legalising abortion for “Woman’s life in danger” and “Non-viable fetal anomaly” was supported at least up to 12 weeks gestation by 66.8% and 63.0% respectively, and in all stages of pregnancy by 54.2% and 50.2% respectively. Support, at least up to 12 weeks gestation, was less for other circumstances: “Rape or incest” (35.3%); “Preserve a woman’s physical health” (30.0%); “Preserve a woman’s mental health” (26.8%); “Viable fetal anomaly” (24.6%); “<16 years of age” (23.8%); “Economic/social reasons” (18.9%); “Any circumstance” (14.5%). According to the surveyed respondents, there is at present a clear majority of doctors in Malta who do not agree with the total legal ban on abortion and support its legalisation in limited circumstances. Taylor & Francis 2019-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7888034/ /pubmed/31744424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2019.1683127 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Research Articles
Gravino, Gilbert
Caruana-Finkel, Liza
Abortion and methods of reproductive planning: the views of Malta’s medical doctor cohort
title Abortion and methods of reproductive planning: the views of Malta’s medical doctor cohort
title_full Abortion and methods of reproductive planning: the views of Malta’s medical doctor cohort
title_fullStr Abortion and methods of reproductive planning: the views of Malta’s medical doctor cohort
title_full_unstemmed Abortion and methods of reproductive planning: the views of Malta’s medical doctor cohort
title_short Abortion and methods of reproductive planning: the views of Malta’s medical doctor cohort
title_sort abortion and methods of reproductive planning: the views of malta’s medical doctor cohort
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7888034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31744424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2019.1683127
work_keys_str_mv AT gravinogilbert abortionandmethodsofreproductiveplanningtheviewsofmaltasmedicaldoctorcohort
AT caruanafinkelliza abortionandmethodsofreproductiveplanningtheviewsofmaltasmedicaldoctorcohort