Cargando…

Reproductive injustice, trans rights, and eugenics

This article explores how the recognition of the gender identity of trans people can have negative consequences on their reproductive health and rights. First, it argues that, while both the right to gender identity and the right to sexual and reproductive health are part of the indivisible core of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Radi, Blas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7888063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33054686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2020.1824318
_version_ 1783652094184521728
author Radi, Blas
author_facet Radi, Blas
author_sort Radi, Blas
collection PubMed
description This article explores how the recognition of the gender identity of trans people can have negative consequences on their reproductive health and rights. First, it argues that, while both the right to gender identity and the right to sexual and reproductive health are part of the indivisible core of human rights, in practice trans people are forced to choose between them. Understanding this scenario requires focusing on the eugenic dimensions of trans policies, even in states where the recognition of a gender identity other than that assigned at birth is not tied to surgical or hormonal compromises. The concept of “passive eugenics”, coined over twenty years ago by James Bowman, offers a valuable key in this respect. Second, the paper highlights some factors that hinder a successful approach to the reproductive health and rights of trans people. These factors include: the normative imageries about the reproductive capacities and desires of trans people, representations about pregnancy and “womanhood”, and the form taken by identity politics in contemporary feminist movements. The attention given as a priority (if not exclusively) to initiatives for the legalisation of voluntary abortion, understood as a right pertaining to (cis) women, offers a significant example of these difficulties. Finally, the paper advocates the adoption of a reproductive justice approach to work on sexual and reproductive health and rights, arguing that it has, among other virtues, that of challenging the binary matrix that characterises Western thought.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7888063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78880632021-03-30 Reproductive injustice, trans rights, and eugenics Radi, Blas Sex Reprod Health Matters Research Articles This article explores how the recognition of the gender identity of trans people can have negative consequences on their reproductive health and rights. First, it argues that, while both the right to gender identity and the right to sexual and reproductive health are part of the indivisible core of human rights, in practice trans people are forced to choose between them. Understanding this scenario requires focusing on the eugenic dimensions of trans policies, even in states where the recognition of a gender identity other than that assigned at birth is not tied to surgical or hormonal compromises. The concept of “passive eugenics”, coined over twenty years ago by James Bowman, offers a valuable key in this respect. Second, the paper highlights some factors that hinder a successful approach to the reproductive health and rights of trans people. These factors include: the normative imageries about the reproductive capacities and desires of trans people, representations about pregnancy and “womanhood”, and the form taken by identity politics in contemporary feminist movements. The attention given as a priority (if not exclusively) to initiatives for the legalisation of voluntary abortion, understood as a right pertaining to (cis) women, offers a significant example of these difficulties. Finally, the paper advocates the adoption of a reproductive justice approach to work on sexual and reproductive health and rights, arguing that it has, among other virtues, that of challenging the binary matrix that characterises Western thought. Taylor & Francis 2020-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7888063/ /pubmed/33054686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2020.1824318 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Radi, Blas
Reproductive injustice, trans rights, and eugenics
title Reproductive injustice, trans rights, and eugenics
title_full Reproductive injustice, trans rights, and eugenics
title_fullStr Reproductive injustice, trans rights, and eugenics
title_full_unstemmed Reproductive injustice, trans rights, and eugenics
title_short Reproductive injustice, trans rights, and eugenics
title_sort reproductive injustice, trans rights, and eugenics
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7888063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33054686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2020.1824318
work_keys_str_mv AT radiblas reproductiveinjusticetransrightsandeugenics