Cargando…

Neurophysiological validation of simultaneous intrinsic and reflexive joint impedance estimates

BACKGROUND: People with brain or neural injuries, such as cerebral palsy or spinal cord injury, commonly have joint hyper-resistance. Diagnosis and treatment of joint hyper-resistance is challenging due to a mix of tonic and phasic contributions. The parallel-cascade (PC) system identification techn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van ’t Veld, Ronald C., Schouten, Alfred C., van der Kooij, Herman, van Asseldonk, Edwin H. F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7888166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33596944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00809-3
_version_ 1783652115222102016
author van ’t Veld, Ronald C.
Schouten, Alfred C.
van der Kooij, Herman
van Asseldonk, Edwin H. F.
author_facet van ’t Veld, Ronald C.
Schouten, Alfred C.
van der Kooij, Herman
van Asseldonk, Edwin H. F.
author_sort van ’t Veld, Ronald C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: People with brain or neural injuries, such as cerebral palsy or spinal cord injury, commonly have joint hyper-resistance. Diagnosis and treatment of joint hyper-resistance is challenging due to a mix of tonic and phasic contributions. The parallel-cascade (PC) system identification technique offers a potential solution to disentangle the intrinsic (tonic) and reflexive (phasic) contributions to joint impedance, i.e. resistance. However, a simultaneous neurophysiological validation of both intrinsic and reflexive joint impedances is lacking. This simultaneous validation is important given the mix of tonic and phasic contributions to joint hyper-resistance. Therefore, the main goal of this paper is to perform a group-level neurophysiological validation of the PC system identification technique using electromyography (EMG) measurements. METHODS: Ten healthy people participated in the study. Perturbations were applied to the ankle joint to elicit reflexes and allow for system identification. Participants completed 20 hold periods of 60 seconds, assumed to have constant joint impedance, with varying magnitudes of intrinsic and reflexive joint impedances across periods. Each hold period provided a paired data point between the PC-based estimates and neurophysiological measures, i.e. between intrinsic stiffness and background EMG, and between reflexive gain and reflex EMG. RESULTS: The intrinsic paired data points, with all subjects combined, were strongly correlated, with a range of [Formula: see text] in both ankle plantarflexors and dorsiflexors. The reflexive paired data points were moderately correlated, with [Formula: see text] in the ankle plantarflexors only. CONCLUSION: An agreement with the neurophysiological basis on which PC algorithms are built is necessary to support its clinical application in people with joint hyper-resistance. Our results show this agreement for the PC system identification technique on group-level. Consequently, these results show the validity of the use of the technique for the integrated assessment and training of people with joint hyper-resistance in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7888166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78881662021-02-22 Neurophysiological validation of simultaneous intrinsic and reflexive joint impedance estimates van ’t Veld, Ronald C. Schouten, Alfred C. van der Kooij, Herman van Asseldonk, Edwin H. F. J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: People with brain or neural injuries, such as cerebral palsy or spinal cord injury, commonly have joint hyper-resistance. Diagnosis and treatment of joint hyper-resistance is challenging due to a mix of tonic and phasic contributions. The parallel-cascade (PC) system identification technique offers a potential solution to disentangle the intrinsic (tonic) and reflexive (phasic) contributions to joint impedance, i.e. resistance. However, a simultaneous neurophysiological validation of both intrinsic and reflexive joint impedances is lacking. This simultaneous validation is important given the mix of tonic and phasic contributions to joint hyper-resistance. Therefore, the main goal of this paper is to perform a group-level neurophysiological validation of the PC system identification technique using electromyography (EMG) measurements. METHODS: Ten healthy people participated in the study. Perturbations were applied to the ankle joint to elicit reflexes and allow for system identification. Participants completed 20 hold periods of 60 seconds, assumed to have constant joint impedance, with varying magnitudes of intrinsic and reflexive joint impedances across periods. Each hold period provided a paired data point between the PC-based estimates and neurophysiological measures, i.e. between intrinsic stiffness and background EMG, and between reflexive gain and reflex EMG. RESULTS: The intrinsic paired data points, with all subjects combined, were strongly correlated, with a range of [Formula: see text] in both ankle plantarflexors and dorsiflexors. The reflexive paired data points were moderately correlated, with [Formula: see text] in the ankle plantarflexors only. CONCLUSION: An agreement with the neurophysiological basis on which PC algorithms are built is necessary to support its clinical application in people with joint hyper-resistance. Our results show this agreement for the PC system identification technique on group-level. Consequently, these results show the validity of the use of the technique for the integrated assessment and training of people with joint hyper-resistance in clinical practice. BioMed Central 2021-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7888166/ /pubmed/33596944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00809-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
van ’t Veld, Ronald C.
Schouten, Alfred C.
van der Kooij, Herman
van Asseldonk, Edwin H. F.
Neurophysiological validation of simultaneous intrinsic and reflexive joint impedance estimates
title Neurophysiological validation of simultaneous intrinsic and reflexive joint impedance estimates
title_full Neurophysiological validation of simultaneous intrinsic and reflexive joint impedance estimates
title_fullStr Neurophysiological validation of simultaneous intrinsic and reflexive joint impedance estimates
title_full_unstemmed Neurophysiological validation of simultaneous intrinsic and reflexive joint impedance estimates
title_short Neurophysiological validation of simultaneous intrinsic and reflexive joint impedance estimates
title_sort neurophysiological validation of simultaneous intrinsic and reflexive joint impedance estimates
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7888166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33596944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00809-3
work_keys_str_mv AT vantveldronaldc neurophysiologicalvalidationofsimultaneousintrinsicandreflexivejointimpedanceestimates
AT schoutenalfredc neurophysiologicalvalidationofsimultaneousintrinsicandreflexivejointimpedanceestimates
AT vanderkooijherman neurophysiologicalvalidationofsimultaneousintrinsicandreflexivejointimpedanceestimates
AT vanasseldonkedwinhf neurophysiologicalvalidationofsimultaneousintrinsicandreflexivejointimpedanceestimates