Cargando…

Performance comparison of four types of target enrichment baits for exome DNA sequencing

BACKGROUND: Next-generation sequencing technology is developing rapidly and target capture sequencing has become an important technique. Several different platforms for library preparation and target capture with different bait types respectively are commercially available. Here we compare the perfo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Juan, Zhang, Mancang, Li, Xiaoqi, Wang, Zhuo, Pan, Dun, Shi, Yongyong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7888174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33597004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41065-021-00171-3
_version_ 1783652116635582464
author Zhou, Juan
Zhang, Mancang
Li, Xiaoqi
Wang, Zhuo
Pan, Dun
Shi, Yongyong
author_facet Zhou, Juan
Zhang, Mancang
Li, Xiaoqi
Wang, Zhuo
Pan, Dun
Shi, Yongyong
author_sort Zhou, Juan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Next-generation sequencing technology is developing rapidly and target capture sequencing has become an important technique. Several different platforms for library preparation and target capture with different bait types respectively are commercially available. Here we compare the performance of the four platforms with different bait types to find out their advantages and limitations. The purpose of this study is to help investigators and clinicians select the appropriate platform for their particular application and lay the foundation for the development of a better target capture platform for next-generation sequencing. RESULTS: We formulate capture efficiency as a novel parameter that can be used to better evaluations of specificity and coverage depth among the different capture platforms. Target coverage, capture efficiency, GC bias, AT Dropout, sensitivity in single nucleotide polymorphisms, small insertions and deletions detection, and the feature of each platform were compared for low input samples. In general, all platforms perform well and small differences among them are revealed. In our results, RNA baits have stronger binding power than DNA baits, and with ultra deep sequencing, double stranded RNA baits perform better than single stranded RNA baits in all aspects. DNA baits got better performance in the region with high GC content and RNA baits got lower AT dropout suggesting that the binding power is different between DNA and RNA baits to genome regions with different characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: The platforms with double stranded RNA baits have the most balanced capture performance. Our results show the key differences in performance among the four updated platforms with four different bait types. The better performance of double stranded RNA bait with ultra deep sequencing suggests that it may improve the sensitivity of ultra low frequent mutation detection. In addition, we further propose that the mixed baits of double stranded RNA and single stranded DNA may improve target capture performance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41065-021-00171-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7888174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78881742021-02-22 Performance comparison of four types of target enrichment baits for exome DNA sequencing Zhou, Juan Zhang, Mancang Li, Xiaoqi Wang, Zhuo Pan, Dun Shi, Yongyong Hereditas Research BACKGROUND: Next-generation sequencing technology is developing rapidly and target capture sequencing has become an important technique. Several different platforms for library preparation and target capture with different bait types respectively are commercially available. Here we compare the performance of the four platforms with different bait types to find out their advantages and limitations. The purpose of this study is to help investigators and clinicians select the appropriate platform for their particular application and lay the foundation for the development of a better target capture platform for next-generation sequencing. RESULTS: We formulate capture efficiency as a novel parameter that can be used to better evaluations of specificity and coverage depth among the different capture platforms. Target coverage, capture efficiency, GC bias, AT Dropout, sensitivity in single nucleotide polymorphisms, small insertions and deletions detection, and the feature of each platform were compared for low input samples. In general, all platforms perform well and small differences among them are revealed. In our results, RNA baits have stronger binding power than DNA baits, and with ultra deep sequencing, double stranded RNA baits perform better than single stranded RNA baits in all aspects. DNA baits got better performance in the region with high GC content and RNA baits got lower AT dropout suggesting that the binding power is different between DNA and RNA baits to genome regions with different characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: The platforms with double stranded RNA baits have the most balanced capture performance. Our results show the key differences in performance among the four updated platforms with four different bait types. The better performance of double stranded RNA bait with ultra deep sequencing suggests that it may improve the sensitivity of ultra low frequent mutation detection. In addition, we further propose that the mixed baits of double stranded RNA and single stranded DNA may improve target capture performance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41065-021-00171-3. BioMed Central 2021-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7888174/ /pubmed/33597004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41065-021-00171-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zhou, Juan
Zhang, Mancang
Li, Xiaoqi
Wang, Zhuo
Pan, Dun
Shi, Yongyong
Performance comparison of four types of target enrichment baits for exome DNA sequencing
title Performance comparison of four types of target enrichment baits for exome DNA sequencing
title_full Performance comparison of four types of target enrichment baits for exome DNA sequencing
title_fullStr Performance comparison of four types of target enrichment baits for exome DNA sequencing
title_full_unstemmed Performance comparison of four types of target enrichment baits for exome DNA sequencing
title_short Performance comparison of four types of target enrichment baits for exome DNA sequencing
title_sort performance comparison of four types of target enrichment baits for exome dna sequencing
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7888174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33597004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41065-021-00171-3
work_keys_str_mv AT zhoujuan performancecomparisonoffourtypesoftargetenrichmentbaitsforexomednasequencing
AT zhangmancang performancecomparisonoffourtypesoftargetenrichmentbaitsforexomednasequencing
AT lixiaoqi performancecomparisonoffourtypesoftargetenrichmentbaitsforexomednasequencing
AT wangzhuo performancecomparisonoffourtypesoftargetenrichmentbaitsforexomednasequencing
AT pandun performancecomparisonoffourtypesoftargetenrichmentbaitsforexomednasequencing
AT shiyongyong performancecomparisonoffourtypesoftargetenrichmentbaitsforexomednasequencing