Cargando…

Sepsis in patients with haematological versus solid cancer: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to examine the outcome of haematological and patients with solid cancer presenting with sepsis to the emergency department (ED). DESIGN: Single-centred, retrospective cohort study. Setting conducted at an academic emergency department of a tertiary hospital. PARTICIPANTS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bou Chebl, Ralphe, Safa, Rawan, Sabra, Mohammad, Chami, Ali, Berbari, Iskandar, Jamali, Sarah, Makki, Maha, Tamim, Hani, Abou Dagher, Gilbert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7888325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33593761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038349
_version_ 1783652139365564416
author Bou Chebl, Ralphe
Safa, Rawan
Sabra, Mohammad
Chami, Ali
Berbari, Iskandar
Jamali, Sarah
Makki, Maha
Tamim, Hani
Abou Dagher, Gilbert
author_facet Bou Chebl, Ralphe
Safa, Rawan
Sabra, Mohammad
Chami, Ali
Berbari, Iskandar
Jamali, Sarah
Makki, Maha
Tamim, Hani
Abou Dagher, Gilbert
author_sort Bou Chebl, Ralphe
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aims to examine the outcome of haematological and patients with solid cancer presenting with sepsis to the emergency department (ED). DESIGN: Single-centred, retrospective cohort study. Setting conducted at an academic emergency department of a tertiary hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All patients >18 years of age admitted with sepsis were included. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were stratified into two groups: haematological and solid malignancy. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME: The primary outcome of the study was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, ICU and hospital lengths of stay and mechanical ventilation duration. RESULTS: 442 sepsis cancer patients were included in the study, of which 305 patients (69%) had solid tumours and 137 patients (31%) had a haematological malignancy. The mean age at presentation was 67.92 (±13.32) and 55.37 (±20.85) (p<0.001) for solid and liquid tumours, respectively. Among patients with solid malignancies, lung cancer was the most common source (15.6%). As for the laboratory workup, septic solid cancer patients were found to have a higher white blood count (12 576.90 vs 9137.23; p=0.026). During their hospital stay, a total of 158 (51.8%) patients with a solid malignancy died compared with 57 (41.6%) patients with a haematological malignancy (p=0.047). There was no statistically significant association between cancer type and hospital mortality (OR 1.15 for liquid cancer p 0.58). There was also no statistically significant difference regarding intravenous fluid administration, vasopressor use, steroid use or intubation. CONCLUSION: Solid tumour patients with sepsis or septic shock are at the same risk of mortality as patients with haematological tumours. However, haematological malignancy patients admitted with sepsis or septic shock have higher rates of bacteraemia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7888325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78883252021-03-03 Sepsis in patients with haematological versus solid cancer: a retrospective cohort study Bou Chebl, Ralphe Safa, Rawan Sabra, Mohammad Chami, Ali Berbari, Iskandar Jamali, Sarah Makki, Maha Tamim, Hani Abou Dagher, Gilbert BMJ Open Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVES: This study aims to examine the outcome of haematological and patients with solid cancer presenting with sepsis to the emergency department (ED). DESIGN: Single-centred, retrospective cohort study. Setting conducted at an academic emergency department of a tertiary hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All patients >18 years of age admitted with sepsis were included. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were stratified into two groups: haematological and solid malignancy. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME: The primary outcome of the study was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, ICU and hospital lengths of stay and mechanical ventilation duration. RESULTS: 442 sepsis cancer patients were included in the study, of which 305 patients (69%) had solid tumours and 137 patients (31%) had a haematological malignancy. The mean age at presentation was 67.92 (±13.32) and 55.37 (±20.85) (p<0.001) for solid and liquid tumours, respectively. Among patients with solid malignancies, lung cancer was the most common source (15.6%). As for the laboratory workup, septic solid cancer patients were found to have a higher white blood count (12 576.90 vs 9137.23; p=0.026). During their hospital stay, a total of 158 (51.8%) patients with a solid malignancy died compared with 57 (41.6%) patients with a haematological malignancy (p=0.047). There was no statistically significant association between cancer type and hospital mortality (OR 1.15 for liquid cancer p 0.58). There was also no statistically significant difference regarding intravenous fluid administration, vasopressor use, steroid use or intubation. CONCLUSION: Solid tumour patients with sepsis or septic shock are at the same risk of mortality as patients with haematological tumours. However, haematological malignancy patients admitted with sepsis or septic shock have higher rates of bacteraemia. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7888325/ /pubmed/33593761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038349 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Bou Chebl, Ralphe
Safa, Rawan
Sabra, Mohammad
Chami, Ali
Berbari, Iskandar
Jamali, Sarah
Makki, Maha
Tamim, Hani
Abou Dagher, Gilbert
Sepsis in patients with haematological versus solid cancer: a retrospective cohort study
title Sepsis in patients with haematological versus solid cancer: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Sepsis in patients with haematological versus solid cancer: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Sepsis in patients with haematological versus solid cancer: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Sepsis in patients with haematological versus solid cancer: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Sepsis in patients with haematological versus solid cancer: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort sepsis in patients with haematological versus solid cancer: a retrospective cohort study
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7888325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33593761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038349
work_keys_str_mv AT boucheblralphe sepsisinpatientswithhaematologicalversussolidcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT safarawan sepsisinpatientswithhaematologicalversussolidcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT sabramohammad sepsisinpatientswithhaematologicalversussolidcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT chamiali sepsisinpatientswithhaematologicalversussolidcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT berbariiskandar sepsisinpatientswithhaematologicalversussolidcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT jamalisarah sepsisinpatientswithhaematologicalversussolidcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT makkimaha sepsisinpatientswithhaematologicalversussolidcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT tamimhani sepsisinpatientswithhaematologicalversussolidcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT aboudaghergilbert sepsisinpatientswithhaematologicalversussolidcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy