Cargando…
Annotating Argument Schemes
Argument schemes are abstractions substantiating the inferential connection between premise(s) and conclusion in argumentative communication. Identifying such conventional patterns of reasoning is essential to the interpretation and evaluation of argumentation. Whether studying argumentation from a...
Autores principales: | Visser, Jacky, Lawrence, John, Reed, Chris, Wagemans, Jean, Walton, Douglas |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7888437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33678987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09519-x |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Argument Web: an Online Ecosystem of Tools, Systems and Services for Argumentation
por: Reed, Chris, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Argumentation schemes, fallacies, and evidence in politicians’ argumentative tweets—A coded dataset
por: Macagno, Fabrizio
Publicado: (2022) -
Practical Reasoning and Practical Argumentation: A Stakeholder Commitment Approach
por: van Berkel, Kees, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Micropublications: a semantic model for claims, evidence, arguments and annotations in biomedical communications
por: Clark, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Coercion, Incarceration, and Chemical Castration: An Argument From Autonomy
por: Douglas, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2013)