Cargando…

Evidence-based interventions implemented in low-and middle-income countries for sickle cell disease management: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Despite ~90% of sickle cell disease (SCD) occurring in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), the vast majority of people are not receiving evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to reduce SCD-related adverse outcomes and mortality, and data on implementation research outcomes (IROs) and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gyamfi, Joyce, Ojo, Temitope, Epou, Sabrina, Diawara, Amy, Dike, Lotanna, Adenikinju, Deborah, Enechukwu, Scholastica, Vieira, Dorice, Nnodu, Obiageli, Ogedegbe, Gbenga, Peprah, Emmanuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7888630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33596221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246700
_version_ 1783652197793267712
author Gyamfi, Joyce
Ojo, Temitope
Epou, Sabrina
Diawara, Amy
Dike, Lotanna
Adenikinju, Deborah
Enechukwu, Scholastica
Vieira, Dorice
Nnodu, Obiageli
Ogedegbe, Gbenga
Peprah, Emmanuel
author_facet Gyamfi, Joyce
Ojo, Temitope
Epou, Sabrina
Diawara, Amy
Dike, Lotanna
Adenikinju, Deborah
Enechukwu, Scholastica
Vieira, Dorice
Nnodu, Obiageli
Ogedegbe, Gbenga
Peprah, Emmanuel
author_sort Gyamfi, Joyce
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite ~90% of sickle cell disease (SCD) occurring in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), the vast majority of people are not receiving evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to reduce SCD-related adverse outcomes and mortality, and data on implementation research outcomes (IROs) and SCD is limited. This study aims to synthesize available data on EBIs for SCD and assess IROs. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of RCTs reporting on EBIs for SCD management implemented in LMICs. We identified articles from PubMed/Medline, Global Health, PubMed Central, Embase, Web of Science medical subject heading (MeSH and Emtree) and keywords, published from inception through February 23, 2020, and conducted an updated search through December 24, 2020. We provide intervention characteristics for each study, EBI impact on SCD, and evidence of reporting on IROs. MAIN RESULTS: 29 RCTs were analyzed. EBIs identified included disease modifying agents, supportive care agents/analgesics, anti-malarials, systemic treatments, patient/ provider education, and nutritional supplements. Studies using disease modifying agents, nutritional supplements, and anti-malarials reported improvements in pain crisis, hospitalization, children’s growth and reduction in severity and prevalence of malaria. Two studies reported on the sustainability of supplementary arginine, citrulline, and daily chloroquine and hydroxyurea for SCD patients. Only 13 studies (44.8%) provided descriptions that captured at least three of the eight IROs. There was limited reporting of acceptability, feasibility, fidelity, cost and sustainability. CONCLUSION: EBIs are effective for SCD management in LMICs; however, measurement of IROs is scarce. Future research should focus on penetration of EBIs to inform evidence-based practice and sustainability in the context of LMICs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This review is registered in PROSPERO #CRD42020167289.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7888630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78886302021-02-25 Evidence-based interventions implemented in low-and middle-income countries for sickle cell disease management: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials Gyamfi, Joyce Ojo, Temitope Epou, Sabrina Diawara, Amy Dike, Lotanna Adenikinju, Deborah Enechukwu, Scholastica Vieira, Dorice Nnodu, Obiageli Ogedegbe, Gbenga Peprah, Emmanuel PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite ~90% of sickle cell disease (SCD) occurring in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), the vast majority of people are not receiving evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to reduce SCD-related adverse outcomes and mortality, and data on implementation research outcomes (IROs) and SCD is limited. This study aims to synthesize available data on EBIs for SCD and assess IROs. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of RCTs reporting on EBIs for SCD management implemented in LMICs. We identified articles from PubMed/Medline, Global Health, PubMed Central, Embase, Web of Science medical subject heading (MeSH and Emtree) and keywords, published from inception through February 23, 2020, and conducted an updated search through December 24, 2020. We provide intervention characteristics for each study, EBI impact on SCD, and evidence of reporting on IROs. MAIN RESULTS: 29 RCTs were analyzed. EBIs identified included disease modifying agents, supportive care agents/analgesics, anti-malarials, systemic treatments, patient/ provider education, and nutritional supplements. Studies using disease modifying agents, nutritional supplements, and anti-malarials reported improvements in pain crisis, hospitalization, children’s growth and reduction in severity and prevalence of malaria. Two studies reported on the sustainability of supplementary arginine, citrulline, and daily chloroquine and hydroxyurea for SCD patients. Only 13 studies (44.8%) provided descriptions that captured at least three of the eight IROs. There was limited reporting of acceptability, feasibility, fidelity, cost and sustainability. CONCLUSION: EBIs are effective for SCD management in LMICs; however, measurement of IROs is scarce. Future research should focus on penetration of EBIs to inform evidence-based practice and sustainability in the context of LMICs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This review is registered in PROSPERO #CRD42020167289. Public Library of Science 2021-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7888630/ /pubmed/33596221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246700 Text en © 2021 Gyamfi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gyamfi, Joyce
Ojo, Temitope
Epou, Sabrina
Diawara, Amy
Dike, Lotanna
Adenikinju, Deborah
Enechukwu, Scholastica
Vieira, Dorice
Nnodu, Obiageli
Ogedegbe, Gbenga
Peprah, Emmanuel
Evidence-based interventions implemented in low-and middle-income countries for sickle cell disease management: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title Evidence-based interventions implemented in low-and middle-income countries for sickle cell disease management: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_full Evidence-based interventions implemented in low-and middle-income countries for sickle cell disease management: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Evidence-based interventions implemented in low-and middle-income countries for sickle cell disease management: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Evidence-based interventions implemented in low-and middle-income countries for sickle cell disease management: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_short Evidence-based interventions implemented in low-and middle-income countries for sickle cell disease management: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_sort evidence-based interventions implemented in low-and middle-income countries for sickle cell disease management: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7888630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33596221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246700
work_keys_str_mv AT gyamfijoyce evidencebasedinterventionsimplementedinlowandmiddleincomecountriesforsicklecelldiseasemanagementasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT ojotemitope evidencebasedinterventionsimplementedinlowandmiddleincomecountriesforsicklecelldiseasemanagementasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT epousabrina evidencebasedinterventionsimplementedinlowandmiddleincomecountriesforsicklecelldiseasemanagementasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT diawaraamy evidencebasedinterventionsimplementedinlowandmiddleincomecountriesforsicklecelldiseasemanagementasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT dikelotanna evidencebasedinterventionsimplementedinlowandmiddleincomecountriesforsicklecelldiseasemanagementasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT adenikinjudeborah evidencebasedinterventionsimplementedinlowandmiddleincomecountriesforsicklecelldiseasemanagementasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT enechukwuscholastica evidencebasedinterventionsimplementedinlowandmiddleincomecountriesforsicklecelldiseasemanagementasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT vieiradorice evidencebasedinterventionsimplementedinlowandmiddleincomecountriesforsicklecelldiseasemanagementasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT nnoduobiageli evidencebasedinterventionsimplementedinlowandmiddleincomecountriesforsicklecelldiseasemanagementasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT ogedegbegbenga evidencebasedinterventionsimplementedinlowandmiddleincomecountriesforsicklecelldiseasemanagementasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT peprahemmanuel evidencebasedinterventionsimplementedinlowandmiddleincomecountriesforsicklecelldiseasemanagementasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials