Cargando…

Systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the first-line setting: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

PURPOSE: Management of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) has undergone a paradigm shift with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in the first-line setting. However, direct comparative data are inadequate to inform treatment decisions. Therefore, we aimed to assess first-line therapy for mRCC and in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mori, Keiichiro, Mostafaei, Hadi, Miura, Noriyoshi, Karakiewicz, Pierre I., Luzzago, Stefano, Schmidinger, Manuela, Bruchbacher, Andreas, Pradere, Benjamin, Egawa, Shin, Shariat, Shahrokh F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7889529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32757054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00262-020-02684-8
_version_ 1783652329733488640
author Mori, Keiichiro
Mostafaei, Hadi
Miura, Noriyoshi
Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
Luzzago, Stefano
Schmidinger, Manuela
Bruchbacher, Andreas
Pradere, Benjamin
Egawa, Shin
Shariat, Shahrokh F.
author_facet Mori, Keiichiro
Mostafaei, Hadi
Miura, Noriyoshi
Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
Luzzago, Stefano
Schmidinger, Manuela
Bruchbacher, Andreas
Pradere, Benjamin
Egawa, Shin
Shariat, Shahrokh F.
author_sort Mori, Keiichiro
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Management of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) has undergone a paradigm shift with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in the first-line setting. However, direct comparative data are inadequate to inform treatment decisions. Therefore, we aimed to assess first-line therapy for mRCC and indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of currently available treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multiple databases were searched for articles published before June 2020. Studies that compared overall and/or progression-free survival (OS/PFS) and/or adverse events (AEs) in mRCC patients were considered eligible. RESULTS: Six studies matched our eligibility criteria. For OS, pembrolizumab plus axitinib [hazard ratio (HR) 0.85, 95% credible interval (CrI) 0.73–0.98] and nivolumab plus ipilimumab (HR 0.86, 95% CrI 0.75–0.99) were significantly more effective than sunitinib, and pembrolizumab plus axitinib was probably the best option based on analysis of the treatment ranking. For PFS, pembrolizumab plus axitinib (HR 0.86, 95% CrI 0.76–0.97) and avelumab plus axitinib (HR 0.85, 95% CrI 0.74–0.98) were statistically superior to sunitinib, and avelumab plus axitinib was likely to be the preferred option based on analysis of the treatment ranking, closely followed by pembrolizumab plus axitinib. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab had significantly lower rates of serious AEs than sunitinib. CONCLUSION: Pembrolizumab plus axitinib seemed to be the most efficacious first-line agents, while nivolumab plus ipilimumab had the most favorable efficacy–tolerability equilibrium. These findings may facilitate individualized treatment strategies and inform future direct comparative trials in an expanding treatment options without direct comparison between approved drugs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00262-020-02684-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7889529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78895292021-03-03 Systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the first-line setting: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Mori, Keiichiro Mostafaei, Hadi Miura, Noriyoshi Karakiewicz, Pierre I. Luzzago, Stefano Schmidinger, Manuela Bruchbacher, Andreas Pradere, Benjamin Egawa, Shin Shariat, Shahrokh F. Cancer Immunol Immunother Review PURPOSE: Management of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) has undergone a paradigm shift with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in the first-line setting. However, direct comparative data are inadequate to inform treatment decisions. Therefore, we aimed to assess first-line therapy for mRCC and indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of currently available treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multiple databases were searched for articles published before June 2020. Studies that compared overall and/or progression-free survival (OS/PFS) and/or adverse events (AEs) in mRCC patients were considered eligible. RESULTS: Six studies matched our eligibility criteria. For OS, pembrolizumab plus axitinib [hazard ratio (HR) 0.85, 95% credible interval (CrI) 0.73–0.98] and nivolumab plus ipilimumab (HR 0.86, 95% CrI 0.75–0.99) were significantly more effective than sunitinib, and pembrolizumab plus axitinib was probably the best option based on analysis of the treatment ranking. For PFS, pembrolizumab plus axitinib (HR 0.86, 95% CrI 0.76–0.97) and avelumab plus axitinib (HR 0.85, 95% CrI 0.74–0.98) were statistically superior to sunitinib, and avelumab plus axitinib was likely to be the preferred option based on analysis of the treatment ranking, closely followed by pembrolizumab plus axitinib. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab had significantly lower rates of serious AEs than sunitinib. CONCLUSION: Pembrolizumab plus axitinib seemed to be the most efficacious first-line agents, while nivolumab plus ipilimumab had the most favorable efficacy–tolerability equilibrium. These findings may facilitate individualized treatment strategies and inform future direct comparative trials in an expanding treatment options without direct comparison between approved drugs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00262-020-02684-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-08-05 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7889529/ /pubmed/32757054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00262-020-02684-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review
Mori, Keiichiro
Mostafaei, Hadi
Miura, Noriyoshi
Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
Luzzago, Stefano
Schmidinger, Manuela
Bruchbacher, Andreas
Pradere, Benjamin
Egawa, Shin
Shariat, Shahrokh F.
Systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the first-line setting: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title Systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the first-line setting: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full Systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the first-line setting: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the first-line setting: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the first-line setting: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_short Systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the first-line setting: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_sort systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the first-line setting: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7889529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32757054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00262-020-02684-8
work_keys_str_mv AT morikeiichiro systemictherapyformetastaticrenalcellcarcinomainthefirstlinesettingasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT mostafaeihadi systemictherapyformetastaticrenalcellcarcinomainthefirstlinesettingasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT miuranoriyoshi systemictherapyformetastaticrenalcellcarcinomainthefirstlinesettingasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT karakiewiczpierrei systemictherapyformetastaticrenalcellcarcinomainthefirstlinesettingasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT luzzagostefano systemictherapyformetastaticrenalcellcarcinomainthefirstlinesettingasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT schmidingermanuela systemictherapyformetastaticrenalcellcarcinomainthefirstlinesettingasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT bruchbacherandreas systemictherapyformetastaticrenalcellcarcinomainthefirstlinesettingasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT praderebenjamin systemictherapyformetastaticrenalcellcarcinomainthefirstlinesettingasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT egawashin systemictherapyformetastaticrenalcellcarcinomainthefirstlinesettingasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT shariatshahrokhf systemictherapyformetastaticrenalcellcarcinomainthefirstlinesettingasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis