Cargando…

Understanding timely STEMI treatment performance: A 3‐year retrospective cohort study using diagnosis‐to‐balloon‐time and care subintervals

OBJECTIVE: From the perspective of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centers, locations of ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) diagnosis can include a referring facility, emergency medical services (EMS) transporting to a PCI center, or the PCI center's emergency departmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yiadom, Maame Yaa A. B., Olubowale, Olayemi O., Jenkins, Cathy A., Miller, Karen F., West, Jennifer L., Vogus, Timothy J., Lehmann, Christoph U., Antonello, Victoria D., Bernard, Gordon R., Storrow, Alan B., Lindsell, Christopher J., Liu, Dandan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7890036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33644777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12379
_version_ 1783652430436630528
author Yiadom, Maame Yaa A. B.
Olubowale, Olayemi O.
Jenkins, Cathy A.
Miller, Karen F.
West, Jennifer L.
Vogus, Timothy J.
Lehmann, Christoph U.
Antonello, Victoria D.
Bernard, Gordon R.
Storrow, Alan B.
Lindsell, Christopher J.
Liu, Dandan
author_facet Yiadom, Maame Yaa A. B.
Olubowale, Olayemi O.
Jenkins, Cathy A.
Miller, Karen F.
West, Jennifer L.
Vogus, Timothy J.
Lehmann, Christoph U.
Antonello, Victoria D.
Bernard, Gordon R.
Storrow, Alan B.
Lindsell, Christopher J.
Liu, Dandan
author_sort Yiadom, Maame Yaa A. B.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: From the perspective of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centers, locations of ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) diagnosis can include a referring facility, emergency medical services (EMS) transporting to a PCI center, or the PCI center's emergency department (ED). This challenges the use of door‐to‐balloon‐time as the primary evaluative measure of STEMI treatment pathways. Our objective was to identify opportunities to improve care by quantifying differences in the timeliness of STEMI treatment mobilization based on the location of the diagnostic ECG. METHODS: This 3‐year, single‐center, retrospective cohort study classified patients by diagnostic ECG location: referring facility, EMS, or PCI center ED. We quantified door‐to‐balloon‐time and diagnosis‐to‐balloon‐time with its care subintervals. RESULTS: Of 207 ED STEMI patients, 180 (87%) received PCI. Median diagnosis‐to‐balloon‐times were shortest among the ED‐diagnosed (78 minutes [interquartile range (IQR), 61‐92]), followed by EMS‐identified patients (89 minutes [IQR, 78‐122]), and longest among those referred (140 minutes [IQR, 119‐160]), reflecting time for transport to the PCI center. Conversely, referred patients had the shortest median door‐to‐balloon‐times (38 minutes [IQR, 34‐43]), followed by the EMS‐identified (64 minutes [IQR, 47‐77]), whereas ED‐diagnosed patients had the longest (89 minutes [IQR, 70‐114]), reflecting diagnosis and catheterization lab activation frequently occurring before PCI center ED arrival for referred and EMS‐identified patients. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis‐to‐balloon‐time and its care subintervals are complementary to the traditional door‐to‐balloon‐times as measures of the STEMI treatment process. Together, they highlight opportunities to improve timely identification among ED‐diagnosed patients, use of out‐of‐hospital cath lab activation for EMS‐identified patients, and encourage pathways for referred patients to bypass PCI center EDs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7890036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78900362021-02-26 Understanding timely STEMI treatment performance: A 3‐year retrospective cohort study using diagnosis‐to‐balloon‐time and care subintervals Yiadom, Maame Yaa A. B. Olubowale, Olayemi O. Jenkins, Cathy A. Miller, Karen F. West, Jennifer L. Vogus, Timothy J. Lehmann, Christoph U. Antonello, Victoria D. Bernard, Gordon R. Storrow, Alan B. Lindsell, Christopher J. Liu, Dandan J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open Cardiology OBJECTIVE: From the perspective of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centers, locations of ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) diagnosis can include a referring facility, emergency medical services (EMS) transporting to a PCI center, or the PCI center's emergency department (ED). This challenges the use of door‐to‐balloon‐time as the primary evaluative measure of STEMI treatment pathways. Our objective was to identify opportunities to improve care by quantifying differences in the timeliness of STEMI treatment mobilization based on the location of the diagnostic ECG. METHODS: This 3‐year, single‐center, retrospective cohort study classified patients by diagnostic ECG location: referring facility, EMS, or PCI center ED. We quantified door‐to‐balloon‐time and diagnosis‐to‐balloon‐time with its care subintervals. RESULTS: Of 207 ED STEMI patients, 180 (87%) received PCI. Median diagnosis‐to‐balloon‐times were shortest among the ED‐diagnosed (78 minutes [interquartile range (IQR), 61‐92]), followed by EMS‐identified patients (89 minutes [IQR, 78‐122]), and longest among those referred (140 minutes [IQR, 119‐160]), reflecting time for transport to the PCI center. Conversely, referred patients had the shortest median door‐to‐balloon‐times (38 minutes [IQR, 34‐43]), followed by the EMS‐identified (64 minutes [IQR, 47‐77]), whereas ED‐diagnosed patients had the longest (89 minutes [IQR, 70‐114]), reflecting diagnosis and catheterization lab activation frequently occurring before PCI center ED arrival for referred and EMS‐identified patients. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis‐to‐balloon‐time and its care subintervals are complementary to the traditional door‐to‐balloon‐times as measures of the STEMI treatment process. Together, they highlight opportunities to improve timely identification among ED‐diagnosed patients, use of out‐of‐hospital cath lab activation for EMS‐identified patients, and encourage pathways for referred patients to bypass PCI center EDs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7890036/ /pubmed/33644777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12379 Text en © 2021 The Authors. JACEP Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Emergency Physicians This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Cardiology
Yiadom, Maame Yaa A. B.
Olubowale, Olayemi O.
Jenkins, Cathy A.
Miller, Karen F.
West, Jennifer L.
Vogus, Timothy J.
Lehmann, Christoph U.
Antonello, Victoria D.
Bernard, Gordon R.
Storrow, Alan B.
Lindsell, Christopher J.
Liu, Dandan
Understanding timely STEMI treatment performance: A 3‐year retrospective cohort study using diagnosis‐to‐balloon‐time and care subintervals
title Understanding timely STEMI treatment performance: A 3‐year retrospective cohort study using diagnosis‐to‐balloon‐time and care subintervals
title_full Understanding timely STEMI treatment performance: A 3‐year retrospective cohort study using diagnosis‐to‐balloon‐time and care subintervals
title_fullStr Understanding timely STEMI treatment performance: A 3‐year retrospective cohort study using diagnosis‐to‐balloon‐time and care subintervals
title_full_unstemmed Understanding timely STEMI treatment performance: A 3‐year retrospective cohort study using diagnosis‐to‐balloon‐time and care subintervals
title_short Understanding timely STEMI treatment performance: A 3‐year retrospective cohort study using diagnosis‐to‐balloon‐time and care subintervals
title_sort understanding timely stemi treatment performance: a 3‐year retrospective cohort study using diagnosis‐to‐balloon‐time and care subintervals
topic Cardiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7890036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33644777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12379
work_keys_str_mv AT yiadommaameyaaab understandingtimelystemitreatmentperformancea3yearretrospectivecohortstudyusingdiagnosistoballoontimeandcaresubintervals
AT olubowaleolayemio understandingtimelystemitreatmentperformancea3yearretrospectivecohortstudyusingdiagnosistoballoontimeandcaresubintervals
AT jenkinscathya understandingtimelystemitreatmentperformancea3yearretrospectivecohortstudyusingdiagnosistoballoontimeandcaresubintervals
AT millerkarenf understandingtimelystemitreatmentperformancea3yearretrospectivecohortstudyusingdiagnosistoballoontimeandcaresubintervals
AT westjenniferl understandingtimelystemitreatmentperformancea3yearretrospectivecohortstudyusingdiagnosistoballoontimeandcaresubintervals
AT vogustimothyj understandingtimelystemitreatmentperformancea3yearretrospectivecohortstudyusingdiagnosistoballoontimeandcaresubintervals
AT lehmannchristophu understandingtimelystemitreatmentperformancea3yearretrospectivecohortstudyusingdiagnosistoballoontimeandcaresubintervals
AT antonellovictoriad understandingtimelystemitreatmentperformancea3yearretrospectivecohortstudyusingdiagnosistoballoontimeandcaresubintervals
AT bernardgordonr understandingtimelystemitreatmentperformancea3yearretrospectivecohortstudyusingdiagnosistoballoontimeandcaresubintervals
AT storrowalanb understandingtimelystemitreatmentperformancea3yearretrospectivecohortstudyusingdiagnosistoballoontimeandcaresubintervals
AT lindsellchristopherj understandingtimelystemitreatmentperformancea3yearretrospectivecohortstudyusingdiagnosistoballoontimeandcaresubintervals
AT liudandan understandingtimelystemitreatmentperformancea3yearretrospectivecohortstudyusingdiagnosistoballoontimeandcaresubintervals