Cargando…

Experimental sleep restriction increases latency jitter in pain elicited cortical responses

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown increased pain scores to painful stimulation after experimental sleep restriction, but reduced or unchanged magnitude of the event related potentials (ERPs) when averaged in the time-domain. However, some studies found increased response magnitude when averagin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hansen, J.O., Omland, P.M., Nilsen, K.B., Sand, T., Matre, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7890207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33659735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06188
_version_ 1783652468151812096
author Hansen, J.O.
Omland, P.M.
Nilsen, K.B.
Sand, T.
Matre, D.
author_facet Hansen, J.O.
Omland, P.M.
Nilsen, K.B.
Sand, T.
Matre, D.
author_sort Hansen, J.O.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown increased pain scores to painful stimulation after experimental sleep restriction, but reduced or unchanged magnitude of the event related potentials (ERPs) when averaged in the time-domain. However, some studies found increased response magnitude when averaging in the time-frequency domain. The aim of this study was to determine whether ERP-latency jitter may contribute to this discrepancy. METHODS: Ninety painful electrical stimuli were given to 21 volunteers after two nights of 50% sleep restriction and after two nights of habitual sleep. ERPs were analyzed in the time-domain (N2-and P2-peaks) and time-frequency domain (power spectral density). We quantified latency jitter by the mean consecutive difference (MCD) between single-trial peak latencies and by phase locking value (PLV) across trials. RESULTS: P2-MCD increased from 20.4 ± 2.1 ms after habitual sleep to 24.3 ± 2.2 ms after sleep restriction (19%, p = 0.038) and PLV decreased from 0.582 ± 0.015 after habitual sleep to 0.536 ± 0.015 after sleep restriction (7.9%, p = 0.009). We found no difference for N2-MCD. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that partial sleep restriction increase latency jitter in cortical responses to experimental pain. SIGNIFICANCE: Latency jitter may contribute to the discrepancies between ERP-responses in the time-frequency domain and time-domain. Latency jitter should be considered when ERPs are analyzed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7890207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78902072021-03-02 Experimental sleep restriction increases latency jitter in pain elicited cortical responses Hansen, J.O. Omland, P.M. Nilsen, K.B. Sand, T. Matre, D. Heliyon Research Article OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown increased pain scores to painful stimulation after experimental sleep restriction, but reduced or unchanged magnitude of the event related potentials (ERPs) when averaged in the time-domain. However, some studies found increased response magnitude when averaging in the time-frequency domain. The aim of this study was to determine whether ERP-latency jitter may contribute to this discrepancy. METHODS: Ninety painful electrical stimuli were given to 21 volunteers after two nights of 50% sleep restriction and after two nights of habitual sleep. ERPs were analyzed in the time-domain (N2-and P2-peaks) and time-frequency domain (power spectral density). We quantified latency jitter by the mean consecutive difference (MCD) between single-trial peak latencies and by phase locking value (PLV) across trials. RESULTS: P2-MCD increased from 20.4 ± 2.1 ms after habitual sleep to 24.3 ± 2.2 ms after sleep restriction (19%, p = 0.038) and PLV decreased from 0.582 ± 0.015 after habitual sleep to 0.536 ± 0.015 after sleep restriction (7.9%, p = 0.009). We found no difference for N2-MCD. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that partial sleep restriction increase latency jitter in cortical responses to experimental pain. SIGNIFICANCE: Latency jitter may contribute to the discrepancies between ERP-responses in the time-frequency domain and time-domain. Latency jitter should be considered when ERPs are analyzed. Elsevier 2021-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7890207/ /pubmed/33659735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06188 Text en © 2021 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Hansen, J.O.
Omland, P.M.
Nilsen, K.B.
Sand, T.
Matre, D.
Experimental sleep restriction increases latency jitter in pain elicited cortical responses
title Experimental sleep restriction increases latency jitter in pain elicited cortical responses
title_full Experimental sleep restriction increases latency jitter in pain elicited cortical responses
title_fullStr Experimental sleep restriction increases latency jitter in pain elicited cortical responses
title_full_unstemmed Experimental sleep restriction increases latency jitter in pain elicited cortical responses
title_short Experimental sleep restriction increases latency jitter in pain elicited cortical responses
title_sort experimental sleep restriction increases latency jitter in pain elicited cortical responses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7890207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33659735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06188
work_keys_str_mv AT hansenjo experimentalsleeprestrictionincreaseslatencyjitterinpainelicitedcorticalresponses
AT omlandpm experimentalsleeprestrictionincreaseslatencyjitterinpainelicitedcorticalresponses
AT nilsenkb experimentalsleeprestrictionincreaseslatencyjitterinpainelicitedcorticalresponses
AT sandt experimentalsleeprestrictionincreaseslatencyjitterinpainelicitedcorticalresponses
AT matred experimentalsleeprestrictionincreaseslatencyjitterinpainelicitedcorticalresponses