Cargando…
Experimental sleep restriction increases latency jitter in pain elicited cortical responses
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown increased pain scores to painful stimulation after experimental sleep restriction, but reduced or unchanged magnitude of the event related potentials (ERPs) when averaged in the time-domain. However, some studies found increased response magnitude when averagin...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7890207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33659735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06188 |
_version_ | 1783652468151812096 |
---|---|
author | Hansen, J.O. Omland, P.M. Nilsen, K.B. Sand, T. Matre, D. |
author_facet | Hansen, J.O. Omland, P.M. Nilsen, K.B. Sand, T. Matre, D. |
author_sort | Hansen, J.O. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown increased pain scores to painful stimulation after experimental sleep restriction, but reduced or unchanged magnitude of the event related potentials (ERPs) when averaged in the time-domain. However, some studies found increased response magnitude when averaging in the time-frequency domain. The aim of this study was to determine whether ERP-latency jitter may contribute to this discrepancy. METHODS: Ninety painful electrical stimuli were given to 21 volunteers after two nights of 50% sleep restriction and after two nights of habitual sleep. ERPs were analyzed in the time-domain (N2-and P2-peaks) and time-frequency domain (power spectral density). We quantified latency jitter by the mean consecutive difference (MCD) between single-trial peak latencies and by phase locking value (PLV) across trials. RESULTS: P2-MCD increased from 20.4 ± 2.1 ms after habitual sleep to 24.3 ± 2.2 ms after sleep restriction (19%, p = 0.038) and PLV decreased from 0.582 ± 0.015 after habitual sleep to 0.536 ± 0.015 after sleep restriction (7.9%, p = 0.009). We found no difference for N2-MCD. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that partial sleep restriction increase latency jitter in cortical responses to experimental pain. SIGNIFICANCE: Latency jitter may contribute to the discrepancies between ERP-responses in the time-frequency domain and time-domain. Latency jitter should be considered when ERPs are analyzed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7890207 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78902072021-03-02 Experimental sleep restriction increases latency jitter in pain elicited cortical responses Hansen, J.O. Omland, P.M. Nilsen, K.B. Sand, T. Matre, D. Heliyon Research Article OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown increased pain scores to painful stimulation after experimental sleep restriction, but reduced or unchanged magnitude of the event related potentials (ERPs) when averaged in the time-domain. However, some studies found increased response magnitude when averaging in the time-frequency domain. The aim of this study was to determine whether ERP-latency jitter may contribute to this discrepancy. METHODS: Ninety painful electrical stimuli were given to 21 volunteers after two nights of 50% sleep restriction and after two nights of habitual sleep. ERPs were analyzed in the time-domain (N2-and P2-peaks) and time-frequency domain (power spectral density). We quantified latency jitter by the mean consecutive difference (MCD) between single-trial peak latencies and by phase locking value (PLV) across trials. RESULTS: P2-MCD increased from 20.4 ± 2.1 ms after habitual sleep to 24.3 ± 2.2 ms after sleep restriction (19%, p = 0.038) and PLV decreased from 0.582 ± 0.015 after habitual sleep to 0.536 ± 0.015 after sleep restriction (7.9%, p = 0.009). We found no difference for N2-MCD. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that partial sleep restriction increase latency jitter in cortical responses to experimental pain. SIGNIFICANCE: Latency jitter may contribute to the discrepancies between ERP-responses in the time-frequency domain and time-domain. Latency jitter should be considered when ERPs are analyzed. Elsevier 2021-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7890207/ /pubmed/33659735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06188 Text en © 2021 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hansen, J.O. Omland, P.M. Nilsen, K.B. Sand, T. Matre, D. Experimental sleep restriction increases latency jitter in pain elicited cortical responses |
title | Experimental sleep restriction increases latency jitter in pain elicited cortical responses |
title_full | Experimental sleep restriction increases latency jitter in pain elicited cortical responses |
title_fullStr | Experimental sleep restriction increases latency jitter in pain elicited cortical responses |
title_full_unstemmed | Experimental sleep restriction increases latency jitter in pain elicited cortical responses |
title_short | Experimental sleep restriction increases latency jitter in pain elicited cortical responses |
title_sort | experimental sleep restriction increases latency jitter in pain elicited cortical responses |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7890207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33659735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06188 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hansenjo experimentalsleeprestrictionincreaseslatencyjitterinpainelicitedcorticalresponses AT omlandpm experimentalsleeprestrictionincreaseslatencyjitterinpainelicitedcorticalresponses AT nilsenkb experimentalsleeprestrictionincreaseslatencyjitterinpainelicitedcorticalresponses AT sandt experimentalsleeprestrictionincreaseslatencyjitterinpainelicitedcorticalresponses AT matred experimentalsleeprestrictionincreaseslatencyjitterinpainelicitedcorticalresponses |