Cargando…

Association of Inclusion of Medicare Advantage Patients in Hospitals’ Risk-Standardized Readmission Rates, Performance, and Penalty Status

IMPORTANCE: The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program publicly reports and financially penalizes hospitals according to 30-day risk-standardized readmission rates (RSRRs) exclusively among traditional Medicare (TM) beneficiaries but not persons with Medicare Advantage (MA) coverage. Exclusively re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Panagiotou, Orestis A., Voorhies, Kirsten R., Keohane, Laura M., Kim, Daeho, Adhikari, Deepak, Kumar, Amit, Rivera-Hernandez, Maricruz, Rahman, Momotazur, Gozalo, Pedro, Gutman, Roee, Mor, Vincent, Trivedi, Amal N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7890527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33595661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37320
_version_ 1783652530224365568
author Panagiotou, Orestis A.
Voorhies, Kirsten R.
Keohane, Laura M.
Kim, Daeho
Adhikari, Deepak
Kumar, Amit
Rivera-Hernandez, Maricruz
Rahman, Momotazur
Gozalo, Pedro
Gutman, Roee
Mor, Vincent
Trivedi, Amal N.
author_facet Panagiotou, Orestis A.
Voorhies, Kirsten R.
Keohane, Laura M.
Kim, Daeho
Adhikari, Deepak
Kumar, Amit
Rivera-Hernandez, Maricruz
Rahman, Momotazur
Gozalo, Pedro
Gutman, Roee
Mor, Vincent
Trivedi, Amal N.
author_sort Panagiotou, Orestis A.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program publicly reports and financially penalizes hospitals according to 30-day risk-standardized readmission rates (RSRRs) exclusively among traditional Medicare (TM) beneficiaries but not persons with Medicare Advantage (MA) coverage. Exclusively reporting readmission rates for the TM population may not accurately reflect hospitals’ readmission rates for older adults. OBJECTIVE: To examine how inclusion of MA patients in hospitals’ performance is associated with readmission measures and eligibility for financial penalties. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a retrospective cohort study linking the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review file with the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set at 4070 US acute care hospitals admitting both TM and MA patients. Participants included patients admitted and discharged alive with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), congestive heart failure (CHF), or pneumonia between 2011 and 2015. Data analyses were conducted between April 1, 2018, and November 20, 2020. EXPOSURES: Admission to an acute care hospital. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The outcome was readmission for any reason occurring within 30 days after discharge. Each hospital’s 30-day RSRR was computed on the basis of TM, MA, and all patients and estimated changes in hospitals’ performance and eligibility for financial penalties after including MA beneficiaries for calculating 30-day RSRRs. RESULTS: There were 748 033 TM patients (mean [SD] age, 76.8 [83] years; 360 692 [48.2%] women) and 295 928 MA patients (mean [SD] age, 77.5 [7.9] years; 137 422 [46.4%] women) hospitalized and discharged alive for AMI; 1 327 551 TM patients (mean [SD] age, 81 [8.3] years; 735 855 [55.4%] women) and 457 341 MA patients (mean [SD] age, 79.8 [8.1] years; 243 503 [53.2%] women) for CHF; and 2 017 020 TM patients (mean [SD] age, 80.7 [8.5] years; 1 097 151 [54.4%] women) and 610 790 MA patients (mean [SD] age, 79.6 [8.2] years; 321 350 [52.6%] women) for pneumonia. The 30-day RSRRs for TM and MA patients were correlated (correlation coefficients, 0.31 for AMI, 0.40 for CHF, and 0.41 for pneumonia) and the TM-based RSRR systematically underestimated the RSRR for all Medicare patients for each condition. Of the 2820 hospitals with 25 or more admissions for at least 1 of the outcomes of AMI, CHF, and pneumonia, 635 (23%) had a change in their penalty status for at least 1 of these conditions after including MA data. Changes in hospital performance and penalty status with the inclusion of MA patients were greater for hospitals in the highest quartile of MA admissions. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study, the inclusion of data from MA patients changed the penalty status of a substantial fraction of US hospitals for at least 1 of 3 reported conditions. This suggests that policy makers should consider including all hospital patients, regardless of insurance status, when assessing hospital quality measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7890527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78905272021-03-03 Association of Inclusion of Medicare Advantage Patients in Hospitals’ Risk-Standardized Readmission Rates, Performance, and Penalty Status Panagiotou, Orestis A. Voorhies, Kirsten R. Keohane, Laura M. Kim, Daeho Adhikari, Deepak Kumar, Amit Rivera-Hernandez, Maricruz Rahman, Momotazur Gozalo, Pedro Gutman, Roee Mor, Vincent Trivedi, Amal N. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program publicly reports and financially penalizes hospitals according to 30-day risk-standardized readmission rates (RSRRs) exclusively among traditional Medicare (TM) beneficiaries but not persons with Medicare Advantage (MA) coverage. Exclusively reporting readmission rates for the TM population may not accurately reflect hospitals’ readmission rates for older adults. OBJECTIVE: To examine how inclusion of MA patients in hospitals’ performance is associated with readmission measures and eligibility for financial penalties. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a retrospective cohort study linking the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review file with the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set at 4070 US acute care hospitals admitting both TM and MA patients. Participants included patients admitted and discharged alive with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), congestive heart failure (CHF), or pneumonia between 2011 and 2015. Data analyses were conducted between April 1, 2018, and November 20, 2020. EXPOSURES: Admission to an acute care hospital. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The outcome was readmission for any reason occurring within 30 days after discharge. Each hospital’s 30-day RSRR was computed on the basis of TM, MA, and all patients and estimated changes in hospitals’ performance and eligibility for financial penalties after including MA beneficiaries for calculating 30-day RSRRs. RESULTS: There were 748 033 TM patients (mean [SD] age, 76.8 [83] years; 360 692 [48.2%] women) and 295 928 MA patients (mean [SD] age, 77.5 [7.9] years; 137 422 [46.4%] women) hospitalized and discharged alive for AMI; 1 327 551 TM patients (mean [SD] age, 81 [8.3] years; 735 855 [55.4%] women) and 457 341 MA patients (mean [SD] age, 79.8 [8.1] years; 243 503 [53.2%] women) for CHF; and 2 017 020 TM patients (mean [SD] age, 80.7 [8.5] years; 1 097 151 [54.4%] women) and 610 790 MA patients (mean [SD] age, 79.6 [8.2] years; 321 350 [52.6%] women) for pneumonia. The 30-day RSRRs for TM and MA patients were correlated (correlation coefficients, 0.31 for AMI, 0.40 for CHF, and 0.41 for pneumonia) and the TM-based RSRR systematically underestimated the RSRR for all Medicare patients for each condition. Of the 2820 hospitals with 25 or more admissions for at least 1 of the outcomes of AMI, CHF, and pneumonia, 635 (23%) had a change in their penalty status for at least 1 of these conditions after including MA data. Changes in hospital performance and penalty status with the inclusion of MA patients were greater for hospitals in the highest quartile of MA admissions. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study, the inclusion of data from MA patients changed the penalty status of a substantial fraction of US hospitals for at least 1 of 3 reported conditions. This suggests that policy makers should consider including all hospital patients, regardless of insurance status, when assessing hospital quality measures. American Medical Association 2021-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7890527/ /pubmed/33595661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37320 Text en Copyright 2021 Panagiotou OA et al. JAMA Network Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Panagiotou, Orestis A.
Voorhies, Kirsten R.
Keohane, Laura M.
Kim, Daeho
Adhikari, Deepak
Kumar, Amit
Rivera-Hernandez, Maricruz
Rahman, Momotazur
Gozalo, Pedro
Gutman, Roee
Mor, Vincent
Trivedi, Amal N.
Association of Inclusion of Medicare Advantage Patients in Hospitals’ Risk-Standardized Readmission Rates, Performance, and Penalty Status
title Association of Inclusion of Medicare Advantage Patients in Hospitals’ Risk-Standardized Readmission Rates, Performance, and Penalty Status
title_full Association of Inclusion of Medicare Advantage Patients in Hospitals’ Risk-Standardized Readmission Rates, Performance, and Penalty Status
title_fullStr Association of Inclusion of Medicare Advantage Patients in Hospitals’ Risk-Standardized Readmission Rates, Performance, and Penalty Status
title_full_unstemmed Association of Inclusion of Medicare Advantage Patients in Hospitals’ Risk-Standardized Readmission Rates, Performance, and Penalty Status
title_short Association of Inclusion of Medicare Advantage Patients in Hospitals’ Risk-Standardized Readmission Rates, Performance, and Penalty Status
title_sort association of inclusion of medicare advantage patients in hospitals’ risk-standardized readmission rates, performance, and penalty status
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7890527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33595661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37320
work_keys_str_mv AT panagiotouorestisa associationofinclusionofmedicareadvantagepatientsinhospitalsriskstandardizedreadmissionratesperformanceandpenaltystatus
AT voorhieskirstenr associationofinclusionofmedicareadvantagepatientsinhospitalsriskstandardizedreadmissionratesperformanceandpenaltystatus
AT keohanelauram associationofinclusionofmedicareadvantagepatientsinhospitalsriskstandardizedreadmissionratesperformanceandpenaltystatus
AT kimdaeho associationofinclusionofmedicareadvantagepatientsinhospitalsriskstandardizedreadmissionratesperformanceandpenaltystatus
AT adhikarideepak associationofinclusionofmedicareadvantagepatientsinhospitalsriskstandardizedreadmissionratesperformanceandpenaltystatus
AT kumaramit associationofinclusionofmedicareadvantagepatientsinhospitalsriskstandardizedreadmissionratesperformanceandpenaltystatus
AT riverahernandezmaricruz associationofinclusionofmedicareadvantagepatientsinhospitalsriskstandardizedreadmissionratesperformanceandpenaltystatus
AT rahmanmomotazur associationofinclusionofmedicareadvantagepatientsinhospitalsriskstandardizedreadmissionratesperformanceandpenaltystatus
AT gozalopedro associationofinclusionofmedicareadvantagepatientsinhospitalsriskstandardizedreadmissionratesperformanceandpenaltystatus
AT gutmanroee associationofinclusionofmedicareadvantagepatientsinhospitalsriskstandardizedreadmissionratesperformanceandpenaltystatus
AT morvincent associationofinclusionofmedicareadvantagepatientsinhospitalsriskstandardizedreadmissionratesperformanceandpenaltystatus
AT trivediamaln associationofinclusionofmedicareadvantagepatientsinhospitalsriskstandardizedreadmissionratesperformanceandpenaltystatus