Cargando…

Combined Gaze Metrics as Stress-Sensitive Indicators of Microsurgical Proficiency

Background. Evaluation of microsurgical proficiency is conventionally subjective, time consuming, and unreliable. Eye movement–based metrics have been promising not only in detection of surgical expertise but also in identifying actual cognitive stress and workload. We investigated if pupil dilation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koskinen, Jani, Bednarik, Roman, Vrzakova, Hana, Elomaa, Antti-Pekka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7890692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32687734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1553350620942980
_version_ 1783652550999801856
author Koskinen, Jani
Bednarik, Roman
Vrzakova, Hana
Elomaa, Antti-Pekka
author_facet Koskinen, Jani
Bednarik, Roman
Vrzakova, Hana
Elomaa, Antti-Pekka
author_sort Koskinen, Jani
collection PubMed
description Background. Evaluation of microsurgical proficiency is conventionally subjective, time consuming, and unreliable. Eye movement–based metrics have been promising not only in detection of surgical expertise but also in identifying actual cognitive stress and workload. We investigated if pupil dilations and blinks could be utilized in parallel to accurately classify microsurgical proficiency and its moderating features, especially task-related stress. Methods. Participants (n = 11) were divided into groups based on prior experience in microsurgery: novices (n = 6) with no experience and trained microsurgeons (n = 5). All participants conducted standardized suturing tasks with authentic instruments and a surgical microscope. A support vector machine classifier was used to classify features of microsurgical expertise based on percentage changes in pupil size. Results. A total of 109 successful sutures with 1090 segments were recorded. Classification of expertise from sutures achieved accuracies between 74.3% and 76.0%. Classification from individual segments based on these same features was not feasible. Conclusions. Combined gaze metrics are applicable for classifying surgical proficiency during a defined task. Pupil dilation is also sensitive to external stress factors; however, the usefulness of blinks is impaired by low blink rates. The results can be translated to surgical education to improve feedback and should be investigated individually in the context of actual performance and in real patient operations. Combined gaze metrics may be ultimately utilized to help microsurgeons monitor their performance and workload in real time—which may lead to prevention of errors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7890692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78906922021-03-10 Combined Gaze Metrics as Stress-Sensitive Indicators of Microsurgical Proficiency Koskinen, Jani Bednarik, Roman Vrzakova, Hana Elomaa, Antti-Pekka Surg Innov Original Clinical Science Background. Evaluation of microsurgical proficiency is conventionally subjective, time consuming, and unreliable. Eye movement–based metrics have been promising not only in detection of surgical expertise but also in identifying actual cognitive stress and workload. We investigated if pupil dilations and blinks could be utilized in parallel to accurately classify microsurgical proficiency and its moderating features, especially task-related stress. Methods. Participants (n = 11) were divided into groups based on prior experience in microsurgery: novices (n = 6) with no experience and trained microsurgeons (n = 5). All participants conducted standardized suturing tasks with authentic instruments and a surgical microscope. A support vector machine classifier was used to classify features of microsurgical expertise based on percentage changes in pupil size. Results. A total of 109 successful sutures with 1090 segments were recorded. Classification of expertise from sutures achieved accuracies between 74.3% and 76.0%. Classification from individual segments based on these same features was not feasible. Conclusions. Combined gaze metrics are applicable for classifying surgical proficiency during a defined task. Pupil dilation is also sensitive to external stress factors; however, the usefulness of blinks is impaired by low blink rates. The results can be translated to surgical education to improve feedback and should be investigated individually in the context of actual performance and in real patient operations. Combined gaze metrics may be ultimately utilized to help microsurgeons monitor their performance and workload in real time—which may lead to prevention of errors. SAGE Publications 2020-07-20 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7890692/ /pubmed/32687734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1553350620942980 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Clinical Science
Koskinen, Jani
Bednarik, Roman
Vrzakova, Hana
Elomaa, Antti-Pekka
Combined Gaze Metrics as Stress-Sensitive Indicators of Microsurgical Proficiency
title Combined Gaze Metrics as Stress-Sensitive Indicators of Microsurgical Proficiency
title_full Combined Gaze Metrics as Stress-Sensitive Indicators of Microsurgical Proficiency
title_fullStr Combined Gaze Metrics as Stress-Sensitive Indicators of Microsurgical Proficiency
title_full_unstemmed Combined Gaze Metrics as Stress-Sensitive Indicators of Microsurgical Proficiency
title_short Combined Gaze Metrics as Stress-Sensitive Indicators of Microsurgical Proficiency
title_sort combined gaze metrics as stress-sensitive indicators of microsurgical proficiency
topic Original Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7890692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32687734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1553350620942980
work_keys_str_mv AT koskinenjani combinedgazemetricsasstresssensitiveindicatorsofmicrosurgicalproficiency
AT bednarikroman combinedgazemetricsasstresssensitiveindicatorsofmicrosurgicalproficiency
AT vrzakovahana combinedgazemetricsasstresssensitiveindicatorsofmicrosurgicalproficiency
AT elomaaanttipekka combinedgazemetricsasstresssensitiveindicatorsofmicrosurgicalproficiency