Cargando…

Host–parasite interactions of rodent hosts and ectoparasite communities from different habitats in Germany

BACKGROUND: Small mammals are important maintenance hosts of ectoparasites as well as reservoir hosts for many arthropod-borne pathogens. In Germany, only a few studies have investigated ectoparasite communities on small mammals in their natural habitats. The aim of this study was to assess the spec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Obiegala, Anna, Arnold, Leonie, Pfeffer, Martin, Kiefer, Matthias, Kiefer, Daniel, Sauter-Louis, Carola, Silaghi, Cornelia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7890891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33596984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04615-7
_version_ 1783652590454571008
author Obiegala, Anna
Arnold, Leonie
Pfeffer, Martin
Kiefer, Matthias
Kiefer, Daniel
Sauter-Louis, Carola
Silaghi, Cornelia
author_facet Obiegala, Anna
Arnold, Leonie
Pfeffer, Martin
Kiefer, Matthias
Kiefer, Daniel
Sauter-Louis, Carola
Silaghi, Cornelia
author_sort Obiegala, Anna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Small mammals are important maintenance hosts of ectoparasites as well as reservoir hosts for many arthropod-borne pathogens. In Germany, only a few studies have investigated ectoparasite communities on small mammals in their natural habitats. The aim of this study was to assess the species diversity and parameters influencing the mean intensity and prevalence of macroscopically visible ectoparasites, such as fleas, predatory mites and ticks. METHODS: A total of 779 small mammals and 3383 ticks were available from earlier investigations for the data analysis of the current study from three differently structured study sites. In addition, fleas and predatory mites were collected from the captured rodents and taxonomically identified. Regression analyses were conducted on the group (ticks/mites/fleas) and species levels using hurdle models for the abundance of ectoparasite groups and a negative binomial model for the abundance of species. RESULTS: Nearly 90% of the small mammals analyzed were infested with ectoparasites, with an average of 7.3 specimens per host. Hosts were infested with up to six species of ectoparasites simultaneously. In total, 12 flea, 11 mite and three tick species were detected. Ticks were more prevalent than fleas or mites, with > 80% of the hosts in urban and forest areas hosting ticks and around 60% of hosts presenting fleas, and only 20–40% of hosts presenting mites. Polyparasitism had a statistically significant influence on the prevalence of the investigated tick, mite and flea species, with odds ratios of > 1.0. Trapping location, season and host characteristics had significant influences on some—but not all—of the investigated species. CONCLUSIONS: The diversity of flea species was unexpectedly high and higher than that reported in comparable studies, which can be explained by the differently structured habitats and regions examined in this study. Polyparasitism was a key influencing factor and had a positive effect on the prevalence and/or abundance of the predominant tick, flea and mite species occurring on small mammals. Season, trapping location, host species and sex of the host species also had an influence on the prevalence and mean intensity of certain, but not all, ectoparasite species. [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7890891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78908912021-02-22 Host–parasite interactions of rodent hosts and ectoparasite communities from different habitats in Germany Obiegala, Anna Arnold, Leonie Pfeffer, Martin Kiefer, Matthias Kiefer, Daniel Sauter-Louis, Carola Silaghi, Cornelia Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Small mammals are important maintenance hosts of ectoparasites as well as reservoir hosts for many arthropod-borne pathogens. In Germany, only a few studies have investigated ectoparasite communities on small mammals in their natural habitats. The aim of this study was to assess the species diversity and parameters influencing the mean intensity and prevalence of macroscopically visible ectoparasites, such as fleas, predatory mites and ticks. METHODS: A total of 779 small mammals and 3383 ticks were available from earlier investigations for the data analysis of the current study from three differently structured study sites. In addition, fleas and predatory mites were collected from the captured rodents and taxonomically identified. Regression analyses were conducted on the group (ticks/mites/fleas) and species levels using hurdle models for the abundance of ectoparasite groups and a negative binomial model for the abundance of species. RESULTS: Nearly 90% of the small mammals analyzed were infested with ectoparasites, with an average of 7.3 specimens per host. Hosts were infested with up to six species of ectoparasites simultaneously. In total, 12 flea, 11 mite and three tick species were detected. Ticks were more prevalent than fleas or mites, with > 80% of the hosts in urban and forest areas hosting ticks and around 60% of hosts presenting fleas, and only 20–40% of hosts presenting mites. Polyparasitism had a statistically significant influence on the prevalence of the investigated tick, mite and flea species, with odds ratios of > 1.0. Trapping location, season and host characteristics had significant influences on some—but not all—of the investigated species. CONCLUSIONS: The diversity of flea species was unexpectedly high and higher than that reported in comparable studies, which can be explained by the differently structured habitats and regions examined in this study. Polyparasitism was a key influencing factor and had a positive effect on the prevalence and/or abundance of the predominant tick, flea and mite species occurring on small mammals. Season, trapping location, host species and sex of the host species also had an influence on the prevalence and mean intensity of certain, but not all, ectoparasite species. [Image: see text] BioMed Central 2021-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7890891/ /pubmed/33596984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04615-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Obiegala, Anna
Arnold, Leonie
Pfeffer, Martin
Kiefer, Matthias
Kiefer, Daniel
Sauter-Louis, Carola
Silaghi, Cornelia
Host–parasite interactions of rodent hosts and ectoparasite communities from different habitats in Germany
title Host–parasite interactions of rodent hosts and ectoparasite communities from different habitats in Germany
title_full Host–parasite interactions of rodent hosts and ectoparasite communities from different habitats in Germany
title_fullStr Host–parasite interactions of rodent hosts and ectoparasite communities from different habitats in Germany
title_full_unstemmed Host–parasite interactions of rodent hosts and ectoparasite communities from different habitats in Germany
title_short Host–parasite interactions of rodent hosts and ectoparasite communities from different habitats in Germany
title_sort host–parasite interactions of rodent hosts and ectoparasite communities from different habitats in germany
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7890891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33596984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04615-7
work_keys_str_mv AT obiegalaanna hostparasiteinteractionsofrodenthostsandectoparasitecommunitiesfromdifferenthabitatsingermany
AT arnoldleonie hostparasiteinteractionsofrodenthostsandectoparasitecommunitiesfromdifferenthabitatsingermany
AT pfeffermartin hostparasiteinteractionsofrodenthostsandectoparasitecommunitiesfromdifferenthabitatsingermany
AT kiefermatthias hostparasiteinteractionsofrodenthostsandectoparasitecommunitiesfromdifferenthabitatsingermany
AT kieferdaniel hostparasiteinteractionsofrodenthostsandectoparasitecommunitiesfromdifferenthabitatsingermany
AT sauterlouiscarola hostparasiteinteractionsofrodenthostsandectoparasitecommunitiesfromdifferenthabitatsingermany
AT silaghicornelia hostparasiteinteractionsofrodenthostsandectoparasitecommunitiesfromdifferenthabitatsingermany