Cargando…

Intrafraction cone beam computed tomography verification of breath hold during liver stereotactic radiation therapy

INTRODUCTION: Intrafraction imaging is an Elekta feature that enables cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquisition simultaneously with treatment arc delivery. It has facilitated the introduction of breath‐hold (BH) gated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) by enabling visualisation of tum...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Elizabeth, Muscat, Erika, O’Connor, Patrick, Liu, Howard, Lee, Yoo‐Young, Pryor, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7890922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33025723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.441
_version_ 1783652597428649984
author Brown, Elizabeth
Muscat, Erika
O’Connor, Patrick
Liu, Howard
Lee, Yoo‐Young
Pryor, David
author_facet Brown, Elizabeth
Muscat, Erika
O’Connor, Patrick
Liu, Howard
Lee, Yoo‐Young
Pryor, David
author_sort Brown, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Intrafraction imaging is an Elekta feature that enables cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquisition simultaneously with treatment arc delivery. It has facilitated the introduction of breath‐hold (BH) gated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) by enabling visualisation of tumour and organs at risk during treatment. The aims of this study were to assess BH reproducibility and use intrafraction CBCT (IF‐CBCT) to quantify any variation in diaphragm position (diaphragmatic feathering) during the multiple BHs performed during each arc. METHODS: IF‐CBCTs for consecutive liver SBRT patients where BH was achieved using the Elekta Active Breathing Control (ABC) system were retrospectively evaluated. Average intrafraction couch shifts for deep‐inspiration BH (DIBH) or end‐expiration BH (EEBH) were recorded as an indication of reproducibility. Diaphragmatic feathering was quantified by measuring the difference between the most superior and inferior visible edges of the diaphragm on IF‐CBCTs. RESULTS: A total of 212 images from 30 patients were reviewed. Twenty‐two (73.3%) patients were treated in EEBH. The mean intrafraction shift was similar between DIBH and EEBH groups with the largest mean shift of 0.22cm occurring in the superior–inferior direction. Mean diaphragmatic feathering was similar between the DIBH and EEBH groups, 0.09cm (0‐0.44cm) and 0.14cm (0–1.89cm) respectively. A higher percentage of EEBH patients demonstrated no diaphragmatic feathering throughout treatment compared with DIBH patients (31.8% vs 25%). CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that BH is reproducible in both DIBH and EEBH for liver SBRT treatment using the ABC system. Appropriate patient selection and BH coaching prior to CT simulation are critical to its success.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7890922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78909222021-03-10 Intrafraction cone beam computed tomography verification of breath hold during liver stereotactic radiation therapy Brown, Elizabeth Muscat, Erika O’Connor, Patrick Liu, Howard Lee, Yoo‐Young Pryor, David J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Intrafraction imaging is an Elekta feature that enables cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquisition simultaneously with treatment arc delivery. It has facilitated the introduction of breath‐hold (BH) gated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) by enabling visualisation of tumour and organs at risk during treatment. The aims of this study were to assess BH reproducibility and use intrafraction CBCT (IF‐CBCT) to quantify any variation in diaphragm position (diaphragmatic feathering) during the multiple BHs performed during each arc. METHODS: IF‐CBCTs for consecutive liver SBRT patients where BH was achieved using the Elekta Active Breathing Control (ABC) system were retrospectively evaluated. Average intrafraction couch shifts for deep‐inspiration BH (DIBH) or end‐expiration BH (EEBH) were recorded as an indication of reproducibility. Diaphragmatic feathering was quantified by measuring the difference between the most superior and inferior visible edges of the diaphragm on IF‐CBCTs. RESULTS: A total of 212 images from 30 patients were reviewed. Twenty‐two (73.3%) patients were treated in EEBH. The mean intrafraction shift was similar between DIBH and EEBH groups with the largest mean shift of 0.22cm occurring in the superior–inferior direction. Mean diaphragmatic feathering was similar between the DIBH and EEBH groups, 0.09cm (0‐0.44cm) and 0.14cm (0–1.89cm) respectively. A higher percentage of EEBH patients demonstrated no diaphragmatic feathering throughout treatment compared with DIBH patients (31.8% vs 25%). CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that BH is reproducible in both DIBH and EEBH for liver SBRT treatment using the ABC system. Appropriate patient selection and BH coaching prior to CT simulation are critical to its success. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-06 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7890922/ /pubmed/33025723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.441 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Brown, Elizabeth
Muscat, Erika
O’Connor, Patrick
Liu, Howard
Lee, Yoo‐Young
Pryor, David
Intrafraction cone beam computed tomography verification of breath hold during liver stereotactic radiation therapy
title Intrafraction cone beam computed tomography verification of breath hold during liver stereotactic radiation therapy
title_full Intrafraction cone beam computed tomography verification of breath hold during liver stereotactic radiation therapy
title_fullStr Intrafraction cone beam computed tomography verification of breath hold during liver stereotactic radiation therapy
title_full_unstemmed Intrafraction cone beam computed tomography verification of breath hold during liver stereotactic radiation therapy
title_short Intrafraction cone beam computed tomography verification of breath hold during liver stereotactic radiation therapy
title_sort intrafraction cone beam computed tomography verification of breath hold during liver stereotactic radiation therapy
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7890922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33025723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.441
work_keys_str_mv AT brownelizabeth intrafractionconebeamcomputedtomographyverificationofbreathholdduringliverstereotacticradiationtherapy
AT muscaterika intrafractionconebeamcomputedtomographyverificationofbreathholdduringliverstereotacticradiationtherapy
AT oconnorpatrick intrafractionconebeamcomputedtomographyverificationofbreathholdduringliverstereotacticradiationtherapy
AT liuhoward intrafractionconebeamcomputedtomographyverificationofbreathholdduringliverstereotacticradiationtherapy
AT leeyooyoung intrafractionconebeamcomputedtomographyverificationofbreathholdduringliverstereotacticradiationtherapy
AT pryordavid intrafractionconebeamcomputedtomographyverificationofbreathholdduringliverstereotacticradiationtherapy