Cargando…

FOPR test: a virtual reality-based technique to assess field of perception and field of regard in hemispatial neglect

BACKGROUND: We previously proposed a novel virtual reality-based method to assess human field of perception (FOP) and field of regard (FOR), termed the FOPR test. This study assessed the diagnostic validity of the FOPR test for hemispatial neglect (HSN). METHODS: We included 19 stroke patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Tae-Lim, Kim, Kwanguk, Choi, Changyeol, Lee, Ji-Yeong, Shin, Joon-Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7890954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33602254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00835-1
_version_ 1783652602918993920
author Kim, Tae-Lim
Kim, Kwanguk
Choi, Changyeol
Lee, Ji-Yeong
Shin, Joon-Ho
author_facet Kim, Tae-Lim
Kim, Kwanguk
Choi, Changyeol
Lee, Ji-Yeong
Shin, Joon-Ho
author_sort Kim, Tae-Lim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We previously proposed a novel virtual reality-based method to assess human field of perception (FOP) and field of regard (FOR), termed the FOPR test. This study assessed the diagnostic validity of the FOPR test for hemispatial neglect (HSN). METHODS: We included 19 stroke patients with a lesion in the right hemisphere and with HSN (HSN+SS), 22 stroke patients with a lesion in the right hemisphere and without HSN (HSN−SS), and 22 healthy controls aged 19–65 years. The success rate (SR) and response time (RT) in the FOPR test for both FOP and FOR were assessed (FOP-SR, FOR-SR, FOP-RT, and FOR-RT, respectively). Using a Bland–Altman plot, agreements between the FOPR test and conventional tests were confirmed, and the FOPR test accuracy was verified using the support vector machine (SVM). Measured values were analysed using ANOVA and Kruskall–Wallis tests for group comparison. RESULTS: The Bland–Altman plot showed good agreement between FOPR test and conventional tests; individuals within 95% agreement limits were within the range of 94.8–100.0%. The SVM classification accuracy, using FOP and FOR variables from the left hemispace, ranged from 83.3 to 100.0% in a binary classification (HSN vs non-HSN). The FOPR test demonstrated differences in SR and RT for both FOP and FOR across the groups. CONCLUSION: The FOPR test was valid for the HSN diagnosis and provided quantitative and intuitive information regarding visuospatial function. Furthermore, it might enhance our understanding of visuospatial function including HSN by applying the time relative component and concepts of perception and exploration, FOP and FOR. Trial registration: NCT03463122. Registered 13 March 2018, retrospectively registered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7890954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78909542021-02-22 FOPR test: a virtual reality-based technique to assess field of perception and field of regard in hemispatial neglect Kim, Tae-Lim Kim, Kwanguk Choi, Changyeol Lee, Ji-Yeong Shin, Joon-Ho J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: We previously proposed a novel virtual reality-based method to assess human field of perception (FOP) and field of regard (FOR), termed the FOPR test. This study assessed the diagnostic validity of the FOPR test for hemispatial neglect (HSN). METHODS: We included 19 stroke patients with a lesion in the right hemisphere and with HSN (HSN+SS), 22 stroke patients with a lesion in the right hemisphere and without HSN (HSN−SS), and 22 healthy controls aged 19–65 years. The success rate (SR) and response time (RT) in the FOPR test for both FOP and FOR were assessed (FOP-SR, FOR-SR, FOP-RT, and FOR-RT, respectively). Using a Bland–Altman plot, agreements between the FOPR test and conventional tests were confirmed, and the FOPR test accuracy was verified using the support vector machine (SVM). Measured values were analysed using ANOVA and Kruskall–Wallis tests for group comparison. RESULTS: The Bland–Altman plot showed good agreement between FOPR test and conventional tests; individuals within 95% agreement limits were within the range of 94.8–100.0%. The SVM classification accuracy, using FOP and FOR variables from the left hemispace, ranged from 83.3 to 100.0% in a binary classification (HSN vs non-HSN). The FOPR test demonstrated differences in SR and RT for both FOP and FOR across the groups. CONCLUSION: The FOPR test was valid for the HSN diagnosis and provided quantitative and intuitive information regarding visuospatial function. Furthermore, it might enhance our understanding of visuospatial function including HSN by applying the time relative component and concepts of perception and exploration, FOP and FOR. Trial registration: NCT03463122. Registered 13 March 2018, retrospectively registered. BioMed Central 2021-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7890954/ /pubmed/33602254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00835-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kim, Tae-Lim
Kim, Kwanguk
Choi, Changyeol
Lee, Ji-Yeong
Shin, Joon-Ho
FOPR test: a virtual reality-based technique to assess field of perception and field of regard in hemispatial neglect
title FOPR test: a virtual reality-based technique to assess field of perception and field of regard in hemispatial neglect
title_full FOPR test: a virtual reality-based technique to assess field of perception and field of regard in hemispatial neglect
title_fullStr FOPR test: a virtual reality-based technique to assess field of perception and field of regard in hemispatial neglect
title_full_unstemmed FOPR test: a virtual reality-based technique to assess field of perception and field of regard in hemispatial neglect
title_short FOPR test: a virtual reality-based technique to assess field of perception and field of regard in hemispatial neglect
title_sort fopr test: a virtual reality-based technique to assess field of perception and field of regard in hemispatial neglect
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7890954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33602254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00835-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kimtaelim foprtestavirtualrealitybasedtechniquetoassessfieldofperceptionandfieldofregardinhemispatialneglect
AT kimkwanguk foprtestavirtualrealitybasedtechniquetoassessfieldofperceptionandfieldofregardinhemispatialneglect
AT choichangyeol foprtestavirtualrealitybasedtechniquetoassessfieldofperceptionandfieldofregardinhemispatialneglect
AT leejiyeong foprtestavirtualrealitybasedtechniquetoassessfieldofperceptionandfieldofregardinhemispatialneglect
AT shinjoonho foprtestavirtualrealitybasedtechniquetoassessfieldofperceptionandfieldofregardinhemispatialneglect