Cargando…

Research use at the Ministry of Health in Burkina Faso: the decision-makers’ perspective

BACKGROUND: Despite the increased emphasis placed on the use of evidence for policy development, relatively few initiatives have been developed to support evidence-informed decision-making, especially in West Africa. Moreover, studies examining the conditions under which policy-makers use research-b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Dagenais, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7890999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33597047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00126-9
_version_ 1783652612768268288
author Dagenais, Christian
author_facet Dagenais, Christian
author_sort Dagenais, Christian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the increased emphasis placed on the use of evidence for policy development, relatively few initiatives have been developed to support evidence-informed decision-making, especially in West Africa. Moreover, studies examining the conditions under which policy-makers use research-based evidence are still scarce, but they show that their attitudes and opinions about research are one of the main determinants of such use. In February 2017, Burkina Faso’s Minister of Health planned to create a unit to promote evidence-informed decision-making within the ministry. Before the unit was set up, documenting the attitudes towards research at the highest levels of his Ministry appeared profitable to the unit’s planning. METHOD: Individual interviews were conducted by the author with 14 actors positioned to consider evidence during decision-making from the Burkina Faso’s Minister of health cabinet. An interview grid was used to explore several themes such as attitudes towards research, obstacles and facilitators to research use, example of research use in decision-making and finally, ways to increase decision-makers’ participation in knowledge transfer activities. Interviews were partially transcribed and analysed by the author. RESULTS: The results show a mixed attitude towards research and relatively little indication of research use reported by respondents. Important obstacles were identified: evidence inaccessibility, lack of implementation guidelines, absence of clear communication strategy and studies’ lack of relevance for decision-making. Many suggestions were proposed such as raising awareness, improving access and research communication and prioritizing interactions with researchers. Respondents agree with the low participation of decision-makers in knowledge transfer activities: more leadership from the senior officials was suggested and greater awareness of the importance of their presence. CONCLUSIONS: The conclusion presents avenues for reflection and action to increase the potential impact of the knowledge transfer unit planned within the Ministry of Health of Burkina Faso. This innovative initiative will be impactful if the obstacles identified in this study and policy-makers’ preferences and needs are taken into account during its development and implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7890999
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78909992021-02-22 Research use at the Ministry of Health in Burkina Faso: the decision-makers’ perspective Dagenais, Christian Implement Sci Commun Short Report BACKGROUND: Despite the increased emphasis placed on the use of evidence for policy development, relatively few initiatives have been developed to support evidence-informed decision-making, especially in West Africa. Moreover, studies examining the conditions under which policy-makers use research-based evidence are still scarce, but they show that their attitudes and opinions about research are one of the main determinants of such use. In February 2017, Burkina Faso’s Minister of Health planned to create a unit to promote evidence-informed decision-making within the ministry. Before the unit was set up, documenting the attitudes towards research at the highest levels of his Ministry appeared profitable to the unit’s planning. METHOD: Individual interviews were conducted by the author with 14 actors positioned to consider evidence during decision-making from the Burkina Faso’s Minister of health cabinet. An interview grid was used to explore several themes such as attitudes towards research, obstacles and facilitators to research use, example of research use in decision-making and finally, ways to increase decision-makers’ participation in knowledge transfer activities. Interviews were partially transcribed and analysed by the author. RESULTS: The results show a mixed attitude towards research and relatively little indication of research use reported by respondents. Important obstacles were identified: evidence inaccessibility, lack of implementation guidelines, absence of clear communication strategy and studies’ lack of relevance for decision-making. Many suggestions were proposed such as raising awareness, improving access and research communication and prioritizing interactions with researchers. Respondents agree with the low participation of decision-makers in knowledge transfer activities: more leadership from the senior officials was suggested and greater awareness of the importance of their presence. CONCLUSIONS: The conclusion presents avenues for reflection and action to increase the potential impact of the knowledge transfer unit planned within the Ministry of Health of Burkina Faso. This innovative initiative will be impactful if the obstacles identified in this study and policy-makers’ preferences and needs are taken into account during its development and implementation. BioMed Central 2021-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7890999/ /pubmed/33597047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00126-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Short Report
Dagenais, Christian
Research use at the Ministry of Health in Burkina Faso: the decision-makers’ perspective
title Research use at the Ministry of Health in Burkina Faso: the decision-makers’ perspective
title_full Research use at the Ministry of Health in Burkina Faso: the decision-makers’ perspective
title_fullStr Research use at the Ministry of Health in Burkina Faso: the decision-makers’ perspective
title_full_unstemmed Research use at the Ministry of Health in Burkina Faso: the decision-makers’ perspective
title_short Research use at the Ministry of Health in Burkina Faso: the decision-makers’ perspective
title_sort research use at the ministry of health in burkina faso: the decision-makers’ perspective
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7890999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33597047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00126-9
work_keys_str_mv AT dagenaischristian researchuseattheministryofhealthinburkinafasothedecisionmakersperspective