Cargando…

“I’ll tell you what’s important to me…”: lessons for women’s health screening

BACKGROUND: Providers face increasing demands to screen for various health issues. Family medicine, primary care, and obstetric providers are encouraged to screen women universally for intimate partner violence, which could be challenging without comprehensive screening tools. The screening expectat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ostrach, Bayla M. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33602189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01220-9
_version_ 1783652648620130304
author Ostrach, Bayla M. M.
author_facet Ostrach, Bayla M. M.
author_sort Ostrach, Bayla M. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Providers face increasing demands to screen for various health issues. Family medicine, primary care, and obstetric providers are encouraged to screen women universally for intimate partner violence, which could be challenging without comprehensive screening tools. The screening expectations and demands motivated providers and staff in south-central Appalachia (U.S.) to engage community members in streamlining women’s health screening tools, and integrating intimate partner violence screening questions, through a Human-Centered Design (HCD) process. The objective of this article is to present participants’ experiences with and perceptions of the HCD process for developing screening tools for women’s health. METHODS: This was a qualitative, phenomenological study conducted with community members (n = 4) and providers and staff (n = 7) who participated in the HCD process. Sampling was purposive and opportunistic. An experienced qualitative researcher conducted open-ended, semi-structured interviews with participants. Interviews were transcribed and coded for thematic analysis. RESULTS: Community members reported that in the HCD sessions they wanted clinicians to understand the importance of timing and trust in health screening. They focused on the importance of taking time to build trust before asking about intimate partner violence; not over-focusing on body weight as this can preclude trust and disclosure of other issues; and understanding the role of historical oppression and racial discrimination in contributing to healthcare mistrust. Providers and staff reported that they recognized the importance of these concerns during the HCD process. CONCLUSIONS: Community members provided critical feedback for designing appropriate tools for screening for women’s health. The findings suggest that co-designing screening tools for use in clinical settings can facilitate communication of core values. How, when, and how often screening questions are asked are as important as what is asked—especially as related to intimate partner violence and weight.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7891163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78911632021-02-22 “I’ll tell you what’s important to me…”: lessons for women’s health screening Ostrach, Bayla M. M. BMC Womens Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Providers face increasing demands to screen for various health issues. Family medicine, primary care, and obstetric providers are encouraged to screen women universally for intimate partner violence, which could be challenging without comprehensive screening tools. The screening expectations and demands motivated providers and staff in south-central Appalachia (U.S.) to engage community members in streamlining women’s health screening tools, and integrating intimate partner violence screening questions, through a Human-Centered Design (HCD) process. The objective of this article is to present participants’ experiences with and perceptions of the HCD process for developing screening tools for women’s health. METHODS: This was a qualitative, phenomenological study conducted with community members (n = 4) and providers and staff (n = 7) who participated in the HCD process. Sampling was purposive and opportunistic. An experienced qualitative researcher conducted open-ended, semi-structured interviews with participants. Interviews were transcribed and coded for thematic analysis. RESULTS: Community members reported that in the HCD sessions they wanted clinicians to understand the importance of timing and trust in health screening. They focused on the importance of taking time to build trust before asking about intimate partner violence; not over-focusing on body weight as this can preclude trust and disclosure of other issues; and understanding the role of historical oppression and racial discrimination in contributing to healthcare mistrust. Providers and staff reported that they recognized the importance of these concerns during the HCD process. CONCLUSIONS: Community members provided critical feedback for designing appropriate tools for screening for women’s health. The findings suggest that co-designing screening tools for use in clinical settings can facilitate communication of core values. How, when, and how often screening questions are asked are as important as what is asked—especially as related to intimate partner violence and weight. BioMed Central 2021-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7891163/ /pubmed/33602189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01220-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ostrach, Bayla M. M.
“I’ll tell you what’s important to me…”: lessons for women’s health screening
title “I’ll tell you what’s important to me…”: lessons for women’s health screening
title_full “I’ll tell you what’s important to me…”: lessons for women’s health screening
title_fullStr “I’ll tell you what’s important to me…”: lessons for women’s health screening
title_full_unstemmed “I’ll tell you what’s important to me…”: lessons for women’s health screening
title_short “I’ll tell you what’s important to me…”: lessons for women’s health screening
title_sort “i’ll tell you what’s important to me…”: lessons for women’s health screening
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33602189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01220-9
work_keys_str_mv AT ostrachbaylamm illtellyouwhatsimportanttomelessonsforwomenshealthscreening