Cargando…
Amplicon-based skin microbiome profiles collected by tape stripping with different adhesive film dressings: a comparative study
BACKGROUND: Medical film dressings have been used to obtain skin microbiota for skin microbiome studies, although their adhesive force may be so strong that the skin could be injured when applied to those who have fragile skin, such as older people. Several products with less adhesive force are avai...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33602131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02122-4 |
_version_ | 1783652650470866944 |
---|---|
author | Ogai, Kazuhiro Shibata, Kana Takahashi, Natsuki Ogura, Kohei Okamoto, Shigefumi Sugama, Junko |
author_facet | Ogai, Kazuhiro Shibata, Kana Takahashi, Natsuki Ogura, Kohei Okamoto, Shigefumi Sugama, Junko |
author_sort | Ogai, Kazuhiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Medical film dressings have been used to obtain skin microbiota for skin microbiome studies, although their adhesive force may be so strong that the skin could be injured when applied to those who have fragile skin, such as older people. Several products with less adhesive force are available, although their applicability for skin microbiome studies remains unknown. This study aimed to test whether the dressings with less adhesive force could be used for amplicon-based skin microbiome studies. A set of three different film dressings, with acrylic, urethane, or silicone adhesive, was applied to the back skin of nine healthy young participants. The copy number of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene, microbial compositions, and alpha and beta diversity indices were analyzed by amplicon analysis of the 16S rRNA gene using next-generation sequencing and were compared among the three film dressings. RESULTS: The dressing with acrylic adhesive yielded the highest copy number of 16S rRNA genes, followed by that with urethane adhesive. The silicone-adhesive dressing yielded a significantly lower copy number of the 16S rRNA gene. The microbial composition of skin microbiota was similar among the three film dressings, although significant differences in the relative abundance of Pseudomonas species and alpha diversity indices were found in the silicone-adhesive dressing. The Bray–Curtis dissimilarity was significantly higher between the acrylic- and silicone-adhesive dressings than between the acrylic- and urethane-adhesive dressings. No adverse effects related to tape stripping were observed for any of the film dressings. CONCLUSION: We recommend dressings with acrylic or urethane adhesive for amplicon-based skin microbiome studies. An acrylic adhesive has an advantage in the yield of skin microbiota, and a urethane adhesive should be chosen when applied to fragile skin. The adhesive force of the dressing with silicone adhesive was too weak to be used for collecting skin microbiota. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12866-021-02122-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7891171 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78911712021-02-22 Amplicon-based skin microbiome profiles collected by tape stripping with different adhesive film dressings: a comparative study Ogai, Kazuhiro Shibata, Kana Takahashi, Natsuki Ogura, Kohei Okamoto, Shigefumi Sugama, Junko BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Medical film dressings have been used to obtain skin microbiota for skin microbiome studies, although their adhesive force may be so strong that the skin could be injured when applied to those who have fragile skin, such as older people. Several products with less adhesive force are available, although their applicability for skin microbiome studies remains unknown. This study aimed to test whether the dressings with less adhesive force could be used for amplicon-based skin microbiome studies. A set of three different film dressings, with acrylic, urethane, or silicone adhesive, was applied to the back skin of nine healthy young participants. The copy number of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene, microbial compositions, and alpha and beta diversity indices were analyzed by amplicon analysis of the 16S rRNA gene using next-generation sequencing and were compared among the three film dressings. RESULTS: The dressing with acrylic adhesive yielded the highest copy number of 16S rRNA genes, followed by that with urethane adhesive. The silicone-adhesive dressing yielded a significantly lower copy number of the 16S rRNA gene. The microbial composition of skin microbiota was similar among the three film dressings, although significant differences in the relative abundance of Pseudomonas species and alpha diversity indices were found in the silicone-adhesive dressing. The Bray–Curtis dissimilarity was significantly higher between the acrylic- and silicone-adhesive dressings than between the acrylic- and urethane-adhesive dressings. No adverse effects related to tape stripping were observed for any of the film dressings. CONCLUSION: We recommend dressings with acrylic or urethane adhesive for amplicon-based skin microbiome studies. An acrylic adhesive has an advantage in the yield of skin microbiota, and a urethane adhesive should be chosen when applied to fragile skin. The adhesive force of the dressing with silicone adhesive was too weak to be used for collecting skin microbiota. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12866-021-02122-4. BioMed Central 2021-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7891171/ /pubmed/33602131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02122-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ogai, Kazuhiro Shibata, Kana Takahashi, Natsuki Ogura, Kohei Okamoto, Shigefumi Sugama, Junko Amplicon-based skin microbiome profiles collected by tape stripping with different adhesive film dressings: a comparative study |
title | Amplicon-based skin microbiome profiles collected by tape stripping with different adhesive film dressings: a comparative study |
title_full | Amplicon-based skin microbiome profiles collected by tape stripping with different adhesive film dressings: a comparative study |
title_fullStr | Amplicon-based skin microbiome profiles collected by tape stripping with different adhesive film dressings: a comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Amplicon-based skin microbiome profiles collected by tape stripping with different adhesive film dressings: a comparative study |
title_short | Amplicon-based skin microbiome profiles collected by tape stripping with different adhesive film dressings: a comparative study |
title_sort | amplicon-based skin microbiome profiles collected by tape stripping with different adhesive film dressings: a comparative study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33602131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02122-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ogaikazuhiro ampliconbasedskinmicrobiomeprofilescollectedbytapestrippingwithdifferentadhesivefilmdressingsacomparativestudy AT shibatakana ampliconbasedskinmicrobiomeprofilescollectedbytapestrippingwithdifferentadhesivefilmdressingsacomparativestudy AT takahashinatsuki ampliconbasedskinmicrobiomeprofilescollectedbytapestrippingwithdifferentadhesivefilmdressingsacomparativestudy AT ogurakohei ampliconbasedskinmicrobiomeprofilescollectedbytapestrippingwithdifferentadhesivefilmdressingsacomparativestudy AT okamotoshigefumi ampliconbasedskinmicrobiomeprofilescollectedbytapestrippingwithdifferentadhesivefilmdressingsacomparativestudy AT sugamajunko ampliconbasedskinmicrobiomeprofilescollectedbytapestrippingwithdifferentadhesivefilmdressingsacomparativestudy |